Educational Technology Research and Development

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 90–95 | Cite as

A cross-cultural study of the effect of student-generated visualization on middle school students’ science concept learning in Texas and Taiwan

  • Yi-Chuan Jane Hsieh
  • Lauren Cifuentes
Departments International Review


Science Class Uncertainty Avoidance Asian Student Study Strategy Online Learning Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bransford, J.D. (Ed.). (2000).How people learn: Brain, main, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Research Council. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963).Experimental and quast-experimental designs for research on teaching. chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Cifuentes, L. (1992).The effects of intrastruction in visualization as a study strategy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Cifuentes, L., & Hsieh, Y.C. (2001). Computer graphics for student engagement in science learning.Tech-Trends, 45(5), 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cifuentes, L. & Hsieh, Y.C. (in press-a). Visualization for construction of meaning during study time: A quantative analysis.International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4).Google Scholar
  6. Cifuentes, L. & Hsieh, Y.C. (in press-b). Visualization for construction of meaning during study time: A qualitative analysis.International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(5).Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research. In B.B. Wolman (Ed.),Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 95–121). New York: McGRaw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Dunn, R., Gemake, J., Jalali, F., Zenhausern, R., Quinn, P., & Zenhausern, P. (1900). Cross-cultural differences in the learning styles of fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-grade students of African, Chinaese, Greek, and Mexican hertage.Journal of Multicultural Counseling Development, 18, 68–93.Google Scholar
  9. Gobert, J.D., & Clement, J.J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, V., Bailey, J., & Tillman, C. (1997). Can student-generated illustrations be worth ten thousand words?Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 677–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hillard, III, A.G. (1989). Teachers and cultural styles in a pluralistic society.NEA Today, 7(6), 65–69.Google Scholar
  12. Lam-Phoon, S. (1986).A comparative study of the learning styles of Southeast Asian and American Caucasian college students of two Seventh-Day Adventist campuses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Berrien Springs: Andrews University.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, P.-L.H. (1997).Integrating concept mapping and metacognitive methods in a hypermedia environment for learning science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. West Lafayette: Purdue University.Google Scholar
  14. Mayer, R.E., & Cook, L.K. (1984). Techniques that help readers bild mental models from scientific text: Definitions pretraining and signaling.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1089–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. More, A.J. (1990).learning styles of Native Americans and Asians. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychology Association, 98th, Boston, MA, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330 535).Google Scholar
  16. Riding, R.J. (1994).Cognitive stles analysis. Birmingham, England: Learning and Training Technology.Google Scholar
  17. Riding, R.J., & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of learning style and mode of presentation on learning performance.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 273–279.Google Scholar
  18. Schwartz, D.L. (1993). The construction and analogical transfer of symbolic visualization.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1309–1325.Google Scholar
  19. Shulman, L.S. (1997). Disciplines of inquiry in education: A new overview. In R.M. Jaeger (Ed.).Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 3–29). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  20. Sless, D. (1981).Learning and visual communication. New York: Halsted Press.Google Scholar
  21. Strauss, E., & Lisowski, M. (1998).Biology: The web of life. Menlo, Calif.: Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  22. Tufte, E.R. (1990).Envisioning information. Chelshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  23. Vasquez, J.A. (1990). Teaching to the distinctive traits of minority students.The Clearing House, 63, 299–304.Google Scholar
  24. Wileman, R.E. (1993).Visual communicating. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Zimmermann, W., & Cunningham, S. (Eds). (1991).Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi-Chuan Jane Hsieh
    • 1
  • Lauren Cifuentes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology at Texas A&M UniversityCollege Station

Personalised recommendations