Advertisement

Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment

  • Susan Pedersen
  • Min Liu
Development

Abstract

Teachers’ implementation of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments (SCLEs) will be affected by their beliefs about effective practices. In order for student-centered programs to be used as intended, designers must be aware of the key issues that will shape their implementation and the beliefs teachers hold about these issues. This case study examined 15 teachers’ beliefs about student-centered learning as they implemented Alien Rescue, a computer-based program for middle school science that was designed to create a SCLE in the classroom. Considerations for the design of similar programs are offered.

Keywords

Intrinsic Motivation Cuban Factual Knowledge Epistemological Belief Motivational Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Barab, S.A., Hay, K.E., & Duffy, T.M. (2000).Grounded constructions and how technology can help. Retrieved July 20, 2002, from http://crlt.indiana.edu/publications/tr_12_00.pdfGoogle Scholar
  3. Behrens, J.R., & Smith, M.L. (1996). Data and data analysis. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 945–989). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice.Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.Google Scholar
  5. Bruffee, K.A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning.Change, 27(1), 12–18.Google Scholar
  6. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuban, L. (1982). Persistence of the inevitable: The teacher centered classroom.Education and Urban Society, 15(1), 26–41.Google Scholar
  9. Cuban, L. (1983). How did teachers teach, 1890–1980.Theory into Practice, 22(3), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenhart, M.A., Shrum, J.L., Harding, J.R., & Cuthbert, A.M. (1988). Teacher beliefs: Definitions, findings, and directions.Educational Policy, 2(1), 51–70.Google Scholar
  11. Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices.Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.Google Scholar
  13. Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change.Educational Researcher, 5–12.Google Scholar
  14. Hannafin, M., & Land, S.M. (2000). Technology and student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practices.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hannafin, M., Land, S.M., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-Design Theories and Models (Vol. II, pp. 115–140). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Harter, S. (1978). Pleasure derived from challenge and the effects of receiving grades on children’s difficulty level choices.Child Development, 49, 788–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hedberg, J. (1997, April). Employing cognitive tools within interactive multimedia applications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  18. Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonassen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-Design Theories and Models (Vol. II, pp. 215–239). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.),Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 89–121). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Kohn, A. (1994, October). Grading: The issue is not how but why.Educational Leadership, 38–41.Google Scholar
  22. Land, S.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.),Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Lumpe, A.T., Haney, J.J., & Czerniak, C.M. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions to implement science-technology-society (STS) in the classroom.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lumpe, A.T., Haney, J.J., & Czerniak, C.M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manning, M.L. (2000). Child-centered middle schools: A position paper.Childhood Education, 76(3), 154–159.Google Scholar
  27. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1999).What happens in classrooms? Instructional practices in elementary and secondary schools 1994–95 (NCES 1999-348). Retrieved December 15, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999348.pdfGoogle Scholar
  28. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18, 197–206.Google Scholar
  29. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pedersen, S. (2003). Motivational orientation in a problem-based learning environment.Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(1), 51–77.Google Scholar
  31. Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice.Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rokeach, M. (1968).Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture.Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J., & Gallard, A.J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D.J. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Tom Snyder Productions. (2003). The Great Ocean Rescue [Computer software]. Watertown, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, S.M. (1993). Putting case based learning into context: Examples from legal, business, and medical education.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers.Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Pedersen
    • 1
  • Min Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.the Department of Educational Psychology at Texas A&M UniversityCollege Station
  2. 2.the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Texas at AustinUSA

Personalised recommendations