Advertisement

Sense of community in a higher education television-based distance education program

  • Alfred P. Rovai
  • Robert Lucking
Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure sense of classroom community in a television-based higher education distance education course and in the same course taught by the same instructor in a traditional face-to-face learning environment, in order to determine if differences existed and if so to identify the nature of these differences. Participants for this study consisted of 120 adult learners who were enrolled in either of two sections of a semester-long undergraduate educational technology course offered by an urban state university. One section was taught tradiationally and the other section was taught to a small studio audience and at a distance to 24 remote classroom sites using synchronous one-way television and two-way audio technologies. Study results revealed a significantly lower sense of classroom community among learners in the distance education course, to include the studio audience.

Keywords

Distance Education Distance Learning Remote Site Traditional Group Classroom Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S.M. (1985).Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, K.M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off-campus students.Distance Education, 17(1), 44–71.Google Scholar
  3. Bruffee, K.A. (1993).Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burge, E.J., & Howard, J.L. (1990). Audio-conferencing in graduate education: A case study.The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 97–112.Google Scholar
  5. Coldeway, D.O., Macrury, K., & Spencer, R. (1980).Distance education from the learner’s perspective: The results of individual learner tracking at Athabasca. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 259 228)Google Scholar
  6. Collis, B. (1996).Tele-learning in a digital world: The future of distance learning. London: International Thomson Computer Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning.American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.Google Scholar
  8. Dillon, C. (1992). The study of distance education in the United States: Programs of study and coursework.The American Journal of Distance Eduction, 6(2), 64–69.Google Scholar
  9. Egan, M.W., Sebastian, J., & Welch, M. (1991). Effective television teaching: Perceptions of those who count most_distance learners.Proceedings of the Rural Synposium, Nashville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 579)Google Scholar
  10. Fox, E., & Kieffer, L. (1995). Multimedia curricula, courses and knowledge modules,ACM Computing Surveys, 27(4) 549–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frymier, A.B. (1993).The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation over the course of a semester. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367 020)Google Scholar
  12. Goldstein, J. (1991). Research needs in distance learning: A practitioner’s perspective. In Moore, M.G. and Thompson, M.M. (1990).The effects of distance learning: A summary of the literature. (Research Monograph No. 2), University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, American Center for the Study of Distance Education, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 330 321)Google Scholar
  13. Hill, J.L. (1996). Psychological sense of community: Suggestions for future research.Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hillman, D.C., Willis, D.J., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction if distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners.The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.Google Scholar
  15. Hiltz, S.R. (1998).Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Building learning communities. Invited address at the WEB98 Conference, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  16. Keegan, D. (1986).The foundations of distance education. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  17. McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory.Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
  18. Moore, M.G. (1992). Editorial: Three types of interaction.The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationship.Journal of Marketing, 57, (January), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999).Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.),Distance education: International perspectives, 34–45, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Prawat, R. and Floden, R.E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning.Educational Psychology, 29(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Preece, J. (2000).Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  24. Rahm, D., & Reed, B.J. (1998). Tangled webs in public administration: Organizational issues in distance learning.Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal,3(1).Google Scholar
  25. Rheingold, H.R. (1991).Virtual reality. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
  26. Rovai, A.P. (in press). Development of an Instrument to Measure Classroom Community.The Internet and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, T.L. (1999).No significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  28. Rutz, E., & Hajek, B. (1998).Collaborative distance learning using interactive video: Lessons learned from the University of Cincinnati/Ohio State University experience. Madison, WI: Distance Learning ’98. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 422 870)Google Scholar
  29. Sarason, S. (1974).The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Shaffer, C., & Anundsen, K. (1993).Creating community anywhere, New York: Perigee.Google Scholar
  31. Sheets, M. (1992, Spring). Characteristics of adult education students and factors which determine course completion: A review.New Horizons in Adult Education, 6(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  32. Threlkeld, R. & Brzoska, K. (1994).Research in distance education. In B. Willis (Ed.),Distance education: Strategies and tools. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Education Technology Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiesenberg, F., & Hutton, S. (1995).Teaching a graduate program using computer mediated conferencing software. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Adult and Continuing Education, Kansas City, MO, November 1995.Google Scholar
  35. Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction to networks in the global village. In Wellman, B. (Ed.),Networks in the Global Village. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Zhang, S., & Fulford, C.P. (1994). Are interaction time and psychological interactivity the same thing in the distance learning television classroom?,Educational Technology, 34, 58–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfred P. Rovai
    • 1
  • Robert Lucking
    • 2
  1. 1.Regent University School of Education in Virginia Beach
  2. 2.Darden College of EducationOld Dominion UniversityNorfolk

Personalised recommendations