Cyclopentadienyl type η5-π-complexes of C60 fullerene derivatives with indium and thallium: simulation of molecular and electronic structure by the MNDO/PM3 methodof C60 fullerene derivatives with indium and thallium: simulation of molecular and electronic structure by the MNDO/PM3 method
- 43 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
The results of MNDO/PM3 calculations of η5-π-C60R5M complexes (R=H and Ph; M=Tl and In) are reported. Local energy minima and geometric parameters as well as the heats of formation and ionization potentials were determined for all systems in question. The nature of chemical M—pent bonding (pent is the pentagonal face) is discussed. The results of calculations are compared with experimental data that confirm our predictions about the possibility of existence of stable cyclopentadienyl type η5-π-complexes of C60 fullerence derivatives. The stability of the C60In12 complex with theI h symmetry, in which the In atoms are coordinated to each of 12 pentagonal faces of C60 fullerene, was estimated. The energy of the In—pent bond (62.4 kcal mol−1) is close to that in C60H5In (64.5 kcal mol−1).
Key words
fullerene, π-complexes, thallium, indium quantum-chemical calculation, MNDO/PM3 methodPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.D. Bakowies, W. Thiel,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991,113, 3704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.E. Kaufmann, K. Raghavachari, and A. E. Reed,Organometallics, 1988,7, 1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.E. Clementi, G. Corongiu, D. Bahattacharya, B. Feuston, D. Frye, A. Preiskorn, A. Rizzo, and W. Hue,Chem. Rev., 1991,91, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.V. I. Sokolov and I. V. Stankevich,Usp. Khim., 1993,62, 455 [Russ. Chem. Rev., 1993,62, 419 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
- 5.Y. C. Fann, D. Singh, and S. A. Jansen,J. Phys. Chem., 1992,96, 5817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.J. A. Lopez and G. Mealli,J. Organometal. Chem., 1994,478, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.E. G. Gal'pern, N. P. Gambaryan, I. V. Stankevich, and A. L. Chistyakov,Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 1994, 598. [Russ. Chem. Bull., 1994,43, 547 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
- 8.A. L. Chistyakov and I. V. Stankevich,Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 1996, 2422 [Russ. Chem. Bull., 1996,45, 2294 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
- 9.A. L. Chistyakov, I. V. Stankevich, and N. P. Gambaryan,Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 1995, 885 [Russ. Chem. Bull.,44, 1995, 828 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
- 10.G. E. Vainer, I. V. Stankevich, and A. L. Chistyakov,Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 1997, 1268 [Russ. Chem. Bull., 1997,46, 1211 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
- 11.A. L. Chistyakov and I. V. Stankevich,Int. Symp. CACR-96, Moscow, December 17–18, 1996, Book of Abstracts, P 19, p. 47.Google Scholar
- 12.M. Sawamura, H. Iikura, and E. Nakamura,J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1996,118, 12850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.J. J. P. Stewart,J. Comp. Chem., 1989,10, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.J. J. P. Stewart,J. Comp. Chem., 1991,12, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldrige, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunage, K. A. Nguyen, S. J. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, and J. A. Montgomeri,J. Comp. Chem., 1993,14, 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.N. Matsuzawa, D. A. Dixon, and P. J. Crusic,J. Phys. Chem., 1992,96, 8317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.S. Shibata, L. S. Bartell, and R. M. Gavin, Jr.,J. Chem. Phys., 1964,41, 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.J. Kohanoff, W. Andreoni, and M. Parrinello,Chem. Phys. Lett., 1992,198, 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.U. Zimmermann, A. Burkhardt, N. Malinowski, U. Naher, and T. P. Martin,J. Chem. Phys., 1994,101, 2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar