Making sense of tenant participation

  • Peter Somerville
  • Andy Steele


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldbourne Associates (1994),Can Housing Managers Learn to Dance? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Bengtsson, B. (1994), “Tenants' dilemma: on collective action in housing”, paper presented to ENHR conference in Glasgow, 29.8.94-2.9.94.Google Scholar
  3. Bengtsson, B. (1995), “Housing in game-theoretical perspective”,Housing Studies 10(2), pp. 229–243.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, J.M., Portney, K.E. and Thompson, K. (1993),The Rebirth of Urban Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  5. Bines, W., Kemp, P., Pleace, N., and Radley, C. (1993),Managing Social Housing. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. Birchall, J. (1992), “Council tenants: sovereign consumers or pawns in the game?” in Birchall, J. (ed.),Housing Policy in the 1990s. London: Routledge, pp. 163–189.Google Scholar
  7. Bisset, H., Dalton, T. and Lawson, J. (1994),Community Housing in Australia: Issues and Future Directions. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Burnheim, J. (1985),Is Democracy Possible? The Alternative to Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cairncross, L., Clapham, D. and Goodlad, R. (1990),The Pattern of Tenant Participation in Council Housing Management. Discussion Paper 31. Glasgow: Centre for Housing Research, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  10. Cairncross, L., Clapham, D. and Goodlad, R. (1993), “The social bases of tenant organisation”,Housing Studies 8, pp. 179–194.Google Scholar
  11. Cairncross, L., Clapham, D. and Goodlad, R. (1994), “Tenant participation and tenant power in British council housing”,Public Administration 72, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
  12. Camden Tenant (1991), “Estate agreements”,Camden Tenant 2–3 July.Google Scholar
  13. Castells, M. (1983),The City and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, I. and Furbey, R. (1994),The Eclipse of Council Housing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1990),From Paternalism to Participation: Involving People in Social Services. York: Open Services Project/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1992), “The politics of participation”,Critical Social Policy 35, pp. 20–44.Google Scholar
  17. DoE (Department of the Environment) (1989),Tenants in the Lead. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  18. DoE (1990),s167 (1), Local Government and Housing Act 1989 Housing Management Performance Indicators. Circular 19/90. London: DoE.Google Scholar
  19. DoE (1993),Compulsory Competitive Tendering of Housing Management: A Consultation Paper. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  20. DoE (1994),Compulsory Competitive Tendering of Housing Management, Reports from the Pilot Programme No. 3: Tenant Consultation. London: DoE.Google Scholar
  21. Dunleavy, P. (1991),Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  22. Fainstein, S. and Hirst, C. (1995), “Urban social movements”, in Judge, D., Stoker, G. and Wolman, H. (eds.),Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993),The Negotiation of Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Foster, J. and Hope, T. (1993),Housing, Community and Crime: The Impact of the Priority Estates Project. Home Office Research Study No. 131. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  25. Hague, C. (1990), “The development of tenant participation in British council housing”,Housing Studies 5(4), pp. 242–256.Google Scholar
  26. Hardin, R. (1982),Collective Action. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Henney, A. (1980),Trust the Tenant. London: Centre for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  28. Housing Corporation (1989),Performance Expectations: Housing Association Guide to Self-Monitoring. London: Housing Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. IOH-TPAS (Institute of Housing/Tenants Participation Advisory Service) (1989),Tenant Participation in Housing Management. Coventry: Institute of Housing.Google Scholar
  30. Jardan, G. (1994), “‘Reinventing government’: but will it work?”Public Administration 72, pp. 271–279.Google Scholar
  31. Karn, V., Hughes, D., Lickiss, R., and Crawley, J. (1993),Neighbour Disputes: Responses by Social Landlords. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.Google Scholar
  32. Kelly, P. (1994), “The home front page”,ROOF (Jan./Feb.), pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
  33. Leslie, C. (1993), “Laying the foundations for a new housing regime”,Municipal Journal 28.5.93–3.6.93, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
  34. Liedholm, M. and Lindberg, G. (1995), “Tenant power in progress”, paper presented to ENHR Working Group conference in Vienna, 3.5.95–5.5.95.Google Scholar
  35. Marsh, A., Niner, P. and Symon, P. (1993),An Evaluation of the First Year Experience of the Local Authority Reports to Tenants Regime. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, M. (1971),The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992),Reinventing Government. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  38. Pickvance, C. (1995), “Where have urban movements gone?”, in Hadjimichalis, C. and Sadler, D. (eds.).In and Around the Margins of a New Europe. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pott, M. and Smeets, J. (1994), “Privatisation regulated: consequences of privatisation for the social relations between local authorities, housing associations and inhabitants,” paper presented to ENHR conference in Glasgow, 29.8.94–2.9.94.Google Scholar
  40. Power, A. (1988),Under New Management: The Experience of 13 Islington Tenant Management Coops. London: Priority Estates Project.Google Scholar
  41. Richardson, A. (1973), “Organisational conflict: the case of housing maintenance”,Local Government Studies 4, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  42. Richardson, A. (1984),Participation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Shomina, Y. (1995), “New organisations of residents and their economic activity”, paper presented to ENHR Working Group conference in Moscow on Housing Movements, 17.5.95–19.5.95.Google Scholar
  44. Somerville, P. (1994), “The political dimension of landlord-tenant relations”, paper presented to ENHR conference in Glasgow, 29.8.94–2.9.94.Google Scholar
  45. Stearn, J. (1993), “They just love being in control”,Inside Housing 10.12.93, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  46. Symon, P. and Walker, R. (1994), “A consumer perspective of performance indicators: The local housing authority reports to tenants regimes in England and Wales”, paper presented to Housing Studies Association conference at University of York, 6–7 April.Google Scholar
  47. Ward, C. (1974),Tenants Take Over. London: The Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  48. Welsh Office (1991),The Report to Tenants Etc. (Wales) Determination 1990. Cardiff: Welsh Office.Google Scholar
  49. Zipfel, T. (1989),Estate Management Boards. London: Priority Estates Project.Google Scholar
  50. Zuntz, A. (1994), Speech to Chartered Institute of Housing North West Branch Annual Conference at Charnock Richard, 5 May.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Delft University Press 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Somerville
  • Andy Steele

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations