, Volume 55, Issue 3–4, pp 149–156 | Cite as

Correlation between hydrophobic and molecular shape descriptors and retention data of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in reversed-phase chromatography on non-liquid-crystalline, nematic, and smetic stationary phases

  • F. Gritti
  • S. Sourigues
  • G. Félix
  • M. -F. Achard
  • F. Hardouin
Originals Column Liquid Chromatography


The local anisotropic ordering of side-chain liquid-crystalline polymer (SCLCP) stationary phases has been revealed statistically. For this purpose the RP HPLC separation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) on silica coated with three classes (non-liquid-crystalline, nematic, and smectic) of side-chain polymer (SCP) has been compared. The logarithm of the capacity factor (logk) was correlated with three PAH descriptors-the connectivity index (χ) or the hydrophobic fragmental constant (logP), the length-to-breadth ratio (L/B), and a non-planarity term (N p). Statistical results revealed good correlation between the model and experimental data, enabling the different stationary phases to be compared. Recognition of solute size seems similar for each class of polymer but solute non-planarity recognition grows continuously as ordering of the liquid-crystal polymer increases. Recognition of solute lengthening is non-existent for non-liquid-crystalline polymers and suddenly, appears with liquid crystalline polymers. Shape recognition is better for smectic than for nematic SCP. The predictive, ability of this model was tested on highly condensed aromatic compounds. The connectivity index, χ, did not seem appropriate for such systems. its replacement by Rekker's hydrophobic, fragmental constant, logP, was necessary for fitting the retention of these solutes on liquid-crystalline stationary phases.

Key Words

Column liquid chromatography Liquid-crystalline polymer phase Dependence of retention on stationary phase structure Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Keller, H.Z. Anal. Chem. 1963,198, 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Finkelmann, H.; Laub, R.J.; Roberts, W.L.; Smith, C.A. InPolynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Physical and Biological Chemistry: Cooke, M.; Dennis, A.J.; Fisher, G.L. Eds, Battele Press, Columbus, OH,1982.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 2000,893, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Marciniak, W.; Witkiewicz, Z.J. Chromatogr. 1981,207, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Marciniak, W.; Witkiewicz.Z. Biul. Wojsk. Akad. Techn. 1980,29, 73.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Serpinet, J.Wiad. Chem. 1976,30, 793.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Jamil Chowdhury, M.A.; Ihara, H.; Sagawa, T.; Hirayama, C.J. Chromatogr. A 2000,877, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Klein, B.H.; Springer, J.J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1991,14, 1519.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 2001,913, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 2000,897, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gritti, F.; Félix, G.; Achard, M.-F.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A,2001,922, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Keller, P.; Hardouin, F.; Mauzac, M.; Achard, M.-F.Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1988,155, 171.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Mauzac, M.; Hardouin, F.; Richard, H.; Achard, M.-F.; Sigaud, G.; Gasparoux, H.Eur. Polym. J. 1986,22, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Gray, G.; Hill, J.S.; Lacey, D.Angew. Chem. Int. Educ. Engl. Adv. Mater. 1989,28, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Terrien, I.; Achard, M.-F.; Félix, G.; Hardouin, F.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,810, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Rekker, R.F. InThe Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant: Elsevier, Amsterdam.1977.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Randic, M.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,97, 6609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Sander, L.C.; Wise, S.A. InPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Structure Index: NIST Special Publication 922, December1997.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hall, L.H., Kier, L.B.; Murray, W.J.; Randic, M.J. Pharm. Sci. 1975,64, 1971.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hall, L.H.; Kier, L.B.; Murray, W.J.J. Pharm. Sci. 1975,64, 1974.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hall, L.H., Kier, L.B.; Murray, W.J.J. Pharm. Sci. 1975,64, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Radecki, A.; Lamparczyk, H.; Kaliszan, R.Chromatographia 1979,12, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Jinno, K.; Kawasaki, K.Chromatographia 1983,17, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Wise, S.A.; Bonnett, W.J.; Guenther, F.R.; May, W.E.J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1981,19, 457.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Terrien, I., PhD thesis, Université Bordeaux 1, Bordeaux,1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Gritti
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Sourigues
    • 1
  • G. Félix
    • 1
  • M. -F. Achard
    • 2
  • F. Hardouin
    • 2
  1. 1.E.N.S.C.P.B. Université BordeuxPessacFrance
  2. 2.C.R.P.P., CNRSUniversité BordeuxPessacFrance

Personalised recommendations