The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi

, Volume 105, Issue 4, pp 529–538 | Cite as

Seed coat anatomy, karyomorphology, and relationships ofSimmondsia (Simmondsiaceae)

  • Hiroshi Tobe
  • Sachiko Yasuda
  • Kazuo Oginuma
Article

Abstract

The development of the seed coat ofSimmondsia, whose relationships are extremely problematic, is documented, and its structure is compared to those of putatively related families Euphorbiaceae and Buxaceae. InSimmondsia, the young seed coat is composed of (1) the palisadal exotesta, (2) the thick aerenchymatous mesotesta which is further differentiated into the outer and the inner tissue of mesotesta, and the undifferentiated (3) endotesta and (4) tegmen. At maturity, only the palisadal exotesta composed of thick-walled and prismatic cells, as well as the outer tissue of mesotesta composed of elongate, thick-walled cells, are persistent, while all the remainder is crushed. These distinctive structural features of the exo- and mesotesta inSimmondsia are not found in Euphorbiaceae, but prevalent in Buxaceae. Evidence from seed coat anatomy and other sources supports the view thatSimmondsia has close affinities with Buxaceae, and be placed as a distinct family along with Buxaceae in Buxales.Simmondsia has 2n=52 as a tetraploid ofx=13, and probably represents a taxon adapted to desert areas by polyploidization in the order.

Key words

Buxaceae Chromosome Euphorbiaceae Seed Simmondsia Simmondsiaceae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behnke, H.-D. 1982. Sieve-element plastids, exine sculpturing, and the systematic affinities of the Buxaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol.139: 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouman, F. 1984. The ovule.In B.M. Johri, ed., Embryology of Angiosperms, pp. 123–157. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Suchmann, S.L. 1987. Floral biology of jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), an anemophilous plant. Desert Plants8: 111–124.Google Scholar
  4. Carlquist, S. 1982. Wood anatomy of Buxaceae: correlations with ecology and phylogeny. Flora172: 463–491.Google Scholar
  5. Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. — 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. 2nd edn. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Dahlgren, G. 1989. The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of the dicotyledons.In Kit Tan, ed., Plant Taxonomy, Phytogeography and Related Subjects. The Davis and Hedge Festschrift, pp. 249–260. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. Dahlgren, R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nord. J. Bot.3: 119–149.Google Scholar
  10. Drinnan, A.N., P.C. Crane, E.M. Friis andK.R. Pedersen. 1991. Angiosperm flowers and tricolpate pollen of buxceous affinity from the Potomac group (mid-Cretaceous) of eastern North America. Amer. J. Bot.78: 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erdtman, G. 1966. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. (An Introduction to Palynology I). Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Köhler, E. andP. Brückner. 1983. Zur Pollenmorphologie und systematischen Stellung der GattungSimmondsia Nutt. Wiss. Z. Friedrich-Schiller-Univ. Jena, Math.-Naturwiss. Reihe.32: 945–955.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, C.W. andR.A. Sherman. 1985. Meiosis in jojoba,Simmondsia chinensis. Israel J. Bot.34: 1–6.Google Scholar
  14. Löve, A. 1978.In IOPB chromosome number reports LXII. Taxon27: 522.Google Scholar
  15. Melikian, A.P. 1968. On the position of the families Buxaceae and Simmondsiaceae in the system. Bot. Zhurn.53: 1043–1047. (In Russian with English summary).Google Scholar
  16. Nowicke, J.W. andJ.J. Skvarla. 1984. Pollen morphology and the relationships ofSimmondsia chinensis to the order Euphorbiales. Amer. J. Bot.71: 210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oginuma, K. andM. Nakata. 1988. Cytological studies on phanerogams in southern Peru. I. Karyotype ofAcaena ovalifolia. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus., Ser. B,14: 14: 53–56.Google Scholar
  18. Raven, P.H. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: cytology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 724–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —,D.W. Kyhos andA.J. Hill. 1965. Chromosome numbers of spermophytes, mostly Californian. Aliso6: 105–113.Google Scholar
  20. Rost, T.L., A.D. Simper, P. Schell andS. Allen. 1977. Anatomy of jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) seed and the utilization of liquid wax during germination. Econ. Bot.31: 140–147.Google Scholar
  21. Scogin, R. 1980. Serotaxonomy ofSimmondsia chinensis (Simmondsiaceae). Aliso9: 555–559.Google Scholar
  22. Stebbins, G.L. andJ. Major. 1965. Endemism and speciation in the California flora. Ecol. Monogr.35: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Takhtajan, A. 1986. Floristic Regions of the World. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  24. — 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Nauka, Leningrad. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  25. Tanaka, R. 1971. Types of resting nuclei in Orchidaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo84: 118–122.Google Scholar
  26. — 1980. The karyotype.In H. Kihara, ed., Plant Genetics. Vol. 1, pp. 335–358. Shokabo, Tokyo. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  27. Thorne, R.F. 1981. Phytochemistry and angiosperm phylogeny: a summary statement.In D.A. Young and D.S. Seigler, ed., Phytochemistry and Angiosperm Phylogeny, pp. 233–295. Praeger Sci., New York.Google Scholar
  28. — 1983. Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. Nord. J. Bot.3: 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — 1989. Phylogeny and phytogeography. Rhodora91: 10–24.Google Scholar
  30. — 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso13: 365–389.Google Scholar
  31. Vaughan, J.G. 1970. The Structure and Utilization of Oil Seeds. Chapman & Hill, London.Google Scholar
  32. Webster, G.L. 1987. The saga of the spurges: a review of classification and relationships in the Euphorbiales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.94: 3–46.Google Scholar
  33. Wiger, J. 1935. Embrylogical studies on the families Buxaceae, Meliaceae, Simarubaceae and Burseraceae. Thesis, Lund.Google Scholar
  34. Wunderlich, R. 1967. Some remarks on the taxonomic significance of the seed coat. Phytomorphology17: 301–311.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Tobe
    • 1
  • Sachiko Yasuda
    • 2
  • Kazuo Oginuma
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Liberal Arts and SciencesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Human and Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.College of Child DevelopmentKochi UniversityKochiJapan

Personalised recommendations