Changes in plant growth processes under microgravity conditions simulated by a three-dimensional clinostat

  • Takayuki Hoson
  • Seiichiro Kamisaka
  • Yoshio Masuda
  • Masamichi Yamashita


We developed a three-dimensional (3-D) clinostat to simulate a microgravity environment and studied the changes in plant growth processes under this condition. The rate of germination of cress (Lepidium sativum), maize (Zea mays), rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), or azuki bean (Vigna angularis) was not affected on the clinostat. The clinostat rotation did not influence the growth rate of their roots or shoots, except for a slight promotion of growth in azuki roots and epicotyls. On the contrary, the direction of growth of plant organs clearly changed on the 3-D clinostat. On the surface of the earth, roots grow downward while shoots upward in parallel to the gravity vector. On the 3-D clinostat, roots of cress elongated along the direction of the tip of root primordia after having changed the direction continuously. Rice roots also grew parallel to the direction of the tip of root primordia. On the other hand, roots of maize, pea, and azuki bean grew in a random fashion. The direction of growth of shoots was more controlled even on the 3-D clinostat. In a front view of embryos, shoots grew mostly along the direction of the tip of primordia. In a side view, rice coleoptiles showed an adaxial (toward the caryopsis) while coleoptiles of maize and epicotyls of pea and azuki bean an abaxial curvature. The curvature of shoots became larger with their growth. Such an autotropism may have an important role in regulation of life cycle of higher plants under a microgravity environment.

Key words

Autotropism Clinostat (three-dimensional) Germination Gravitropism Growth direction Growth rate Microgravity 





Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atwell, B.J., I. Waters andH. Greenway. 1982. The effect of oxygen and turbulence on elongation of coleoptiles of submergence-tolerant and-intolerant rice cultivars. J. Exp. Bot.33: 1030–1044.Google Scholar
  2. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1925. Das Verhalten der graskeimlinge auf dem Klinostaten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.43: 159–165.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A.H., A.O. Dahl andD.K. Chapman. 1976. Limitation on the use of the horizontal clinostat as a gravity compensator. Plant Physiol.58: 127–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clifford, P.E. 1979. Significance of spontaneous bending during klinostat rotation. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.95: 465–469.Google Scholar
  5. Firn, R.D. andA.B. Myers. 1989. Plant movements caused by differential growth-unity or diversity of mechanisms?In P.W. Barlow ed., Differential Growth in Plants, pp. 47–55. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Halstead, T.W. andF.R. Dutcher. 1987. Plants in space. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.38: 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hensel, W. andT.-H. Iversen. 1980. Ethylene production during clinostat rotation and effect on root geotropism. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.97: 343–352.Google Scholar
  8. — andA. Sievers. 1981. Induction of gravity-dependent plasmatic responses in root statocytes by short time contact between amyloplasts and the distal endoplasmic reticulum complex. Planta153: 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoshizaki, T. andK. C. Hamner. 1962. An unusual stem bending response ofXanthium pensylvanicum to horizontal rotation. Plant Physiol.37: 453–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoson, T., S. Kamisaka, Y. Masuda, B. Buchen, A. Sievers andM. Yamashita. 1990a. Gravitropism and ultrastructure of plant roots grown under a simulated microgravity environment. Biol. Sci. Space4: 271–272. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  11. —,—,—,,M., Yamada andM. Yamashita. 1988. Development of 3-D clinostat and its possible use for the analysis of plant growth processes. Proc. Space Util. Symp.5: 52–56. (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  12. —,—,—,, andM. Yamashita. 1991. Changes in growth and the cell wall of higher plants in a simulated microgravity. Proc. Space Util. Symp.8: 163–168. (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  13. —,S. Maeda, K. Sakaguchi, H. Onishi andH. Ohta. 1990b. Changes in osmotic pressure and cell wall properties during auxin- and ethylene-induced growth of intact coleoptiles of rice. Physiol. Plant.78: 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. —, andS. Wada 1980. Role of hydroxyproline-rich cell wall protein in growth regulation of rice coleoptiles grown on or under water. Plant Cell Physiol.21: 511–524.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1983. Possible role of hexosamine-containing cell wall component in growth regulation of rice coleoptiles. Plant Cell Physiol.24: 1421–1430.Google Scholar
  16. Ishizawa, K. andY. Esashi. 1984. Gaseous factors involved in the enhanced elongation of rice coleoptiles under water., Plant Cell Environ.7: 239–245.Google Scholar
  17. Iversen, T.-H. andP. Larsen. 1973. Movement of amyloplasts in the statocytes of geotropically stimulated roots. The pre-inversion effect. Physiol. Plant.28: 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamisaka, S., K. Nishitani, T. Hoson andY. Masuda. 1988. Growth responses of higher plants to hypo-and hypergravity. Proc. Space Util. Symp.5: 47–51. (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  19. —,K.-S. Tan, T. Hoson andY. Masuda. 1991. Rice coleoptile growth in air and under water. Physiol. Plant.82: B2.Google Scholar
  20. Larsen, P. 1953. Influence of gravity of rate of elongation and on geotropic and autotropic reactions in roots. Physiol. Plant.6: 735–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. — 1957. The development of geotropic and spontaneous curvatures in roots. Physiol. Plant.10: 127–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. — 1962. Geotropism. An introduction.In W. Ruhland, ed., Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, vol. 17/2, pp. 34–73. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Leather, G.R., L.E. Forrence andF.B. Abeles 1972. Increased ethylene production during clinostat experiments may cause leaf epinasty. Plant Physiol.49: 183–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorenzi, G. andG. Perbal. 1990. Root growth and statocyte polarity in lentil seedling roots grown in microgravity or on a slowly rotating clinostat. Physiol. Plant.78: 532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nick, P., M. Furuya andE. Schäfer. 1991. Do microtubules control growth in tropism? Experiments with maize coleoptiles. Plant Cell Physiol.32: 999–1006.Google Scholar
  26. —, andE. Schäfer. 1989. Nastic response of maize (Zea mays L.) coleoptiles during clinostat rotation. Planta179: 123–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohwaki, Y. 1967. Growth of rice coleoptiles in relation to oxygen concentrations. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. IV33: 1–5.Google Scholar
  28. Palmer, J.H. 1973. Ethylene as a cause of transient petiole epinasty inHelianthus annuus during clinostat experiments. Physiol. Plant.28: 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prasad, T.K. andM.G. Cline. 1987. The role of gravity in apical dominance. Effects of clinostating on shoot inversion-induced ethylene production, shoot elongation and lateral bud growth. Plant Physiol.83: 505–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Raskin, I. andH. Kende. 1983. Regulation of growth in rice seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul.2: 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rasmussen, O., C. Baggerud andT.-H. Iversen. 1989. Preparatory studies for the use of plant protoplasts in space research. Physiol. Plant.76: 431–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sachs, J. 1882. Ueber Ausschliessung der geotropischen und heliotropischen Krummungen wahrend des Wachsens. Arb. Botan. Inst. Wurzburg2: 209–225.Google Scholar
  33. Shen-Miller, J., R. Hinchman andS.A. Gordon. 1968. Thresholds for georesponse to acceleration in gravity-compensatedAvena seedlings. Plant Physiol.43: 338–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sievers, A., D. Volkmann, W. Hensel, V. Sobick andW. Briegleb. 1976. Cell polarity in root statocytes in spite of simulated weightlessness. Naturwissenschaften63: 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sobick, V. andA. Sievers. 1979. Responses of roots to simulated weightlessness on the fastrotating clinostat.In R. Holmquist, ed., (COSPAR) Life Sciences and Space Research, vol. 17, pp. 285–290. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Takahashi, H., H. Suge andT. Kato. 1991. Growth promotion by vibration at 50 Hz in rice and cucumber seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol.32: 729–732.Google Scholar
  37. Volkmann, D., H.M. Behrens andA. Sievers. 1986. Development and gravity sensing of cress roots under microgravity. Naturwissenschaften73: 438–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wada, S. 1961. Growth patterns of rice coleoptiles grown on water and under water. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. IV27: 199–207.Google Scholar
  39. Waldron, K.W. andC.T. Brett. 1990. Effects of extreme acceleration on the germination, growth and cell wall composition of pea epicotyls. J. Exp. Bot.41:71–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takayuki Hoson
    • 1
  • Seiichiro Kamisaka
    • 1
  • Yoshio Masuda
    • 1
  • Masamichi Yamashita
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceOsaka City UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Space and Astronautical ScienceKanagawaJapan

Personalised recommendations