The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi

, Volume 100, Issue 4, pp 385–405 | Cite as

Pollen morphology and its taxonomic significance of the monotropoideae (Ericaceae)

  • Hideki Takahashi
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

A palynological survey, including LM, SEM and TEM is presented for eight genera, nine species and 76 samples of the Monotropoideae which is composed of 10 genera and 13 species. On the basis of the aperture number and shape, the following six pollen types are recognized: 1) 3-colp(oroid) ate—Allotropa, 2) 2-colpor(oid)ate—Monotropsis andHemitomes, 3) 4-colpor(oid)ate—Pterospora, Sarcodes andPleuricospora, 4) 2- and 3-colpor(oid)ate—Monotropa hypopitys, 5) 3-colporate and-porate —Monotropa uniflora, 6) 3- to 4- porate—Monotropastrum humile. Relationships among taxa within the Monotropoideae are illustrated on the palynological characters including the aperture type, exine sculpture and structure. Both pollen grains with two and four apertures have evolved independently from pollen grains with three apertures, according to the infraspecific variation of aperture numbers and the usual occurrence of three-aperturate pollen grains in the Ericaceae. 3-colp(oroid)ate pollen ofAllotropa is the most primitive and occupies an isolated position in the subfamily, on the other hand 3- to 4-porate pollen ofMonotropastrum humile is most advanced in the subfamily, probably even in the Ericaceae. A reduced sexine inMonotropastrum humile appears to be a specialized pollen character. Infraspecific geographical difference in palynological characters is revealed in two species ofMonotropa for the first time.M. hypopitys is basically characterized by pollen grains with two apertures in the New World vs. three apertures in the Old World.M. uniflora is basically characterized by 3-porate pollen in the New World vs. 3-colporate in the Old World. In both species pollen grains with more primitive characters usually occur in the Old World.

Key words

Infraspecific variation Monotropoideae New World Old World Pollen morphology Taxonomy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andres, H. 1914. Piroleen-Studien. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Morphologie, Phytogeographie und allgemeinen Systematik der Pirolaceae. Verh. Bot. Ver. Prov. Brandenburg56: 1–76.Google Scholar
  2. Björkman, E. 1960.Monotropa Hypopithys L.—an epiparasite on tree roots. Physiol. Pl. (Copenhagen)13: 308–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Copeland, H.F. 1934. The structure of the flower ofNewberrya. Madroño2: 137–142.Google Scholar
  4. — 1935. On the genusPityopus. Madroño3: 154–168.Google Scholar
  5. — 1937. The reproductive structures ofPleuricospora. Madroño4: 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. — 1938. The structure ofAllotropa. Madroño4: 137–153.Google Scholar
  7. — 1939. The structure ofMonotropsis and the classification of the Monotropoideae. Madroño5: 105–119.Google Scholar
  8. — 1941. Further studies on Monotropoideae. Madroño6: 97–119.Google Scholar
  9. Drude, O. 1889. Pirolaceae.In A. Engler and K. Prantl, ed., Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 1 Aufl., vol. 4/1, pp. 3–11. Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  10. Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Angiosperms. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  11. Furman, T.E. andJ.M. Trappe. 1971. Phylogeny and ecology of mycotrophic achlorophyllous angiosperms. Quart. Rev. Biol.46: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagerup, O. 1944. Notes on some boreal polyploids. Hereditas30: 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hara, H. 1939. Critical notes on some east Asiatic plants (III). J. Jap. Bot.15: 767–773.Google Scholar
  14. — 1941.Monotropastrum globosum H. Andres. Iconographia Plantarum Asiae Orientalis4: 327–328, pl. 109.Google Scholar
  15. — 1961. New or noteworthy flowering plants from Eastern Himalaya (1). J. Jap. Bot.36: 75–80.Google Scholar
  16. — 1965. New or noteworthy flowering plants from Eastern Himalaya (4). J. Jap. Bot.40: 97–103.Google Scholar
  17. Huang, T.C. 1972. Pollen Flora of Taiwan. Botany Dept., National Taiwan Univ., Taipei.Google Scholar
  18. Ikuse, M. 1956. Pollen Grains of Japan. Hirokawa Publ. Co., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  19. Kaplan, S.M. andD.L. Mulcahy. 1971. Mode of pollination and floral sexuality inThalictrum. Evolution25: 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, W.H. 1964.Oldenlandia corymbosa (Rubiaceae). Grana Palynologica5: 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Löve, A. 1954. Cytotaxonomical evaluation of corresponding taxa. Vegetatio5–6: 212–224.Google Scholar
  22. — andD. Löve. 1944. Cytotaxonomical studies on boreal plants. III. Some new chromosome numbers of Scandinavian plants. Arkiv för Botanik31A: 1–23.Google Scholar
  23. Lutz, R.W. andR.D. Sjolund. 1973. Development of the generative cell wall inMonotropa uniflora L. pollen. Plant Physiol.52: 498–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nair, P.K.K. 1965. Pollen Grains of Western Himalayan Plants. Asia Publ. House, Bombay.Google Scholar
  25. Nakamura, J. 1980. Diagnostic Characters of Pollen Grains of Japan. I and II. Osaka Museum of Natural History, Osaka.Google Scholar
  26. Nilsson, S. andJ.J. Skvarla. 1969. Pollen morphology of saprophytic taxa in the Gentianaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.56: 420–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nowicke, J.W. 1966. Pollen morphology and classification of the Pyrolaceae and Monotropaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.53: 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oldfield, F. 1959. The pollen morphology of some of the west European Ericales. Pollen Spores1: 19–48.Google Scholar
  29. Reitsma, T. 1970. Suggestions towards unification of descriptive terminology of angiosperm pollen grains. Rev. Palaeobotan. Palynol.10: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ridgway, J.E. 1970. Pollen germination inMonotropa. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.57: 384–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schultze-Motel, W. 1964. Reihe Ericales.In H. Melchior, ed., A. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 12 Aufl., vol. 2, pp. 381–389. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  32. Sladkov, A.H. 1954. Morphological description of the pollen of the Pyrolaceae, Monotropaceae, Ericaceae, Vacciniaceae and Empetraceae of the European part of the U.S.S.R., Works Inst. of Geography (Acad. of Sci.)61: 119–156. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  33. Stevens, P.F. 1971. A classification of the Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.64: 1–53.Google Scholar
  34. Tarnavschi, I.T. andD. Rădulescu. 1960. Cercetari asupra morfologiei polenului speciilor ordinului Ericales din Flora R.P.R. St. Cerc. Biol., ser. Biol. Veg. Romin.12: 165–175.Google Scholar
  35. Thanikaimoni, G. 1986. Pollen apertures: form and function.In S. Blackmore and I.K. Fergusson, ed., Pollen and Spores: Form and Function, pp. 119–136. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  36. Ueno, J. 1962. Palynological notes on Ericaceae and Pyrolaceae from Japan and its neighbours. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.20: 101–111.Google Scholar
  37. Walker, J.W. andJ.A. Doyle. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 664–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wallace, G.D. 1975a. Studies of the Monotropoideae (Ericaceae): Taxonomy and distribution. Wasmann J. Biol.33: 1–88.Google Scholar
  39. — 1975b. Interrelationships of the subfamilies of the Ericaceae and derivation of the Monotropoideae. Bot. Notiser128: 286–298.Google Scholar
  40. — 1987. Transfer ofEremotropa sciaphila toMonotropastrum (Ericaceae: Monotropoideae). Taxon36: 128–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hideki Takahashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanic Garden, Faculty of AgricultureHokkaido UniversitySapporo

Personalised recommendations