Advertisement

Species diversity and primary productivity inMiscanthus sinensis grasslands

1. Diversity in relation to stand structure and dominance
  • Nobuko Mutoh
  • Makoto Kimura
  • Yasuyuki Oshima
  • Hideo Iwaki
Article

Abstract

In an old field grassland dominated byMiscanthus sinensis Anderss. the community structures, phytomass, dominance ofM. sinensis and species diversity were measured. Species and life form composition of the stand were characterized by higher percentages of therophytes, woody and shrubby species, liana and alien species.

From May so September in 1982, all the aboveground parts were harvested from each of the four quadrats (2 m×2 m) once a month. Seasonal peak of aboveground phytomass, in September, was 1027 g d.w.m−2 to whichM. sinensis contributed as much as 96.5%. With the progress of the growing season,M. sinensis became increasingly important both in stand phytomass and in dominance, whereas species diversity based on the dry weight contributions of constituent species decreased. Our analysis of these seasonal trends showed that the diversity was largely a function of dominance of the most important species, rather than that of stand phytomass or productivity. The simultaneous measurements of 20 quadrats in late August 1983, also supported the above conclusion.

Key words

Dominance Miscanthus sinensis Phytomass Productivity Species diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazzaz, F.A. 1975. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in Southern Illinois. Ecology56: 485–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, W.H. andF.L. Parker. 1970. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science168: 1345–1347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hayashi, I., Y. Hishinuma andT. Yamasawa. 1981. Structure and function ofMiscanthus sinensis grasslands in Sugadaira, Central Japan. Vegetatio48: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Iwaki, H. andB. Midorikawa. 1968. Principles for estimating root production in herbaceous perennials.In: Methods of Productivity Studiet in Root Systems and Rhizosphere Organisms Nauka, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  5. andK. Hogetsu. 1964. Studies on the productivity and nutrient element circulation in Kirigamine grassland, Central Japan II. Seasonal change in standing crop. Bot. Mag. Tokyo77: 447–457.Google Scholar
  6. Iwaki, H., J. Song, M. Kimura, N. Mutoh and Y. Oshima. 1985. Species diversity and primary productivity inMiscanthus sinensis grasslands. 2. Effects of different management practices on species diversity and productivity. Bot. Mag. Tokyo (in press).Google Scholar
  7. MacArthur, R.H. 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure community stability. Ecology36: 533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Margalef, R. 1957. La teoria de la informacion en ecologia. Mem. R. Acad. Barcelona32: 373–449. (English translation by W. Hall. 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen. System.3: 36–71.Google Scholar
  9. McNaughton, S.J. 1967. Relationships among functional properties of Californian grassland. Nature216: 168–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Midorikawa, B., Y. Shimada, H. Iwaki andN., Ohga. 1975. Root production in semi-natural grassland community dominated byMiscanthus senensis in the Kawatabi area.In: M. Numata, ed., Ecological Studies in Japanese Grasslands with Special Reference to the IBP Area. JIBP Synthesis13: 114–122. Univ. Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  11. Numata, M. andS. Asano. 1969. Biological Flora of Japan. Tsukiji Shokan, Tokyo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Pielou, E.C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theoret. Biol.13: 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Raunkiaer, C. 1907. Planterigets Livsformer og deres Betydning for Geografien. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  14. — 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Shimada, Y., H. Iwaki, B. Midorikawa andN. Ohga. 1975. Primary productivity of theMiscanthus sinensis community at the Kawatabi IBP area-Standing crop of above-ground parts-.In: M. Numata, ed., Ecological Studies in Japanese Grasslands with Special Reference to the IBP Area. JIBP Synthesis13: 110–114. Univ. Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  16. Silvertown, J. 1980. The dynamics of a grassland ecosystem: Botanical equilibrium in the Park Grass Experiment. J. Appl. Ecol.17: 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh, J.S. andR. Misra 1969. Diversity, dominance, stability, and net production in the grasslands at Varanasi, India. Can. J. Bot47: 425–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Suganuma, T. andK. Sugawara. 1975. Grassland vegetation of Kawatabi special research area.In: M. Numata, ed., Ecological Studies in Japanese Grasslands with Special Reference to the IBP Area. JIBP Synthesis13: 13–20. Univ. Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  19. Thornthwait, C.W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev.38: 55–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nobuko Mutoh
    • 1
  • Makoto Kimura
    • 1
  • Yasuyuki Oshima
    • 2
  • Hideo Iwaki
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceTokyo Metropolitan UniversityTokyo
  2. 2.Department of Biology, School of EducationWaseda UniversityTokyo
  3. 3.Institute of Biological SciencesUniversity of TsukubaSakura-mura, Ibaraki

Personalised recommendations