algebra universalis

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 67–85 | Cite as

Narrowness implies uniformity

  • Ralph McKenzie


This paper is about varietiesV of universal algebras which satisfy the following numerical condition on the spectrum: there are only finitely many prime integersp such thatp is a divisor of the cardinality of some finite algebra inV. Such varieties are callednarrow.

The variety (or equational class) generated by a classK of similar algebras is denoted by V(K)=HSPK. We define Pr (K) as the set of prime integers which divide the cardinality of a (some) finite member ofK. We callK narrow if Pr (K) is finite. The key result proved here states that for any finite setK of finite algebras of the same type, the following are equivalent: (1) SPK is a narrow class. (2) V(K) has uniform congruence relations. (3) SK has uniform congruences and (3) SK has permuting congruences. (4) Pr (V(K))= Pr(SK).

A varietyV is calleddirectly representable if there is a finite setK of finite algebras such thatV= V(K) and such that all finite algebras inV belong to PK. An equivalent definition states thatV is finitely generated and, up to isomorphism,V has only finitely many finite directly indecomposable algebras. Directly representable varieties are narrow and hence congruence modular. The machinery of modular commutators is applied in this paper to derive the following results for any directly representable varietyV. Each finite, directly indecomposable algebra inV is either simple or abelian.V satisfies the commutator identity [x,y]=x·y·[1,1] holding for congruencesx andy over any member ofV. The problem of characterizing finite algebras which generate directly representable varieties is reduced to a problem of ring theory on which there exists an extensive literature: to characterize those finite ringsR with identity element for which the variety of all unitary leftR-modules is directly representable. (In the terminology of [7], the condition is thatR has finite representation type.) We show that the directly representable varieties of groups are precisely the finitely generated abelian varieties, and that a finite, subdirectly irreducible, ring generates a directly representable variety iff the ring is a field or a zero ring.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. Burris,A note on directly indecomposable algebras, Preprint (1979).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Burris,Arithmetical varieties and Boolean product representations, Preprint (1978).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Burris andR. McKenzie,Decidability and Boolean representations, Preprint (1980).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Clark andP. Krauss,Para primal algebras, Alg. Univ.6 (1976), 165–192.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Clark andP. Krauss,Varieties generated by para primal algebras, Alg. Univ.7 (1977), 93–114.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Clark andP. Krauss,Plain para primal algebras, Alg. Univ. (to appear).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    V. Dlab andC. M. Ringel,On algebras of finite representation type, J. Algebra33 (1975), 306–394.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    V. Dlab andC. M. Ringel,Indecomposable representations of graphs and algebras, Memoirs A.M.S. 6, number173 (1976), 57 pages.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Freese andR. McKenzie,Residually small varieties with modular congruence lattices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 264 (1981), 419–430.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Freese andR. McKenzie,The commutator, an overview, Preprint (1981).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Gratzer,A characterization of neutral elements in lattices, Publications of the Math. Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences,7 (1962), 191–192.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. P. Gumm,Algebras in permutable varieties: geometrical properties of affine algebras, Alg. Univ.9 (1979), 8–34.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Hagemann andC. Herrmann,A concrete ideal multiplication for algebraic systems and its relation to congruence distributivity, Arch. Math. (Basel)32 (1979), 234–245.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    C. Herrmann,Affine algebras in congruence modular varieties, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged),41 (1979), 119–125.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. McKenzie,On minimal, locally finite varieties with permuting congruence relations (unpublished).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. McKenzie,Para primal varieties: A study of finite aziomatizability and definable principal congruences in locally finite varieties, Alg. Univ.8 (1978), 336–348.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. McKenzie,Residually small varieties of K-algebras, Alg. Univ.14 (1982), 181–196.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Quackenbush,Algebras with small fine spectrum (unpublished).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. Quackenbush,Algebras with minimal spectrum, Alg. Univ.10 (1980), 117–129.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. Quackenbush,A new proof of Rosenberg's primal algebra characterization theorem, Preprint (1980).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. D. H. Smith,Malcev Varieties, Springer Lecture Notes 554 (Berlin, 1976).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    W. Taylor,Uniformity of congruences, Alg. Univ.4 (1974), 342–360.MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    W. Taylor,The fine spectrum of a variety, Alg. Univ.5 (1975), 263–303.MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    W. R. Scott,Group Theory, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1974).MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph McKenzie
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations