Journal of Artificial Organs

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 131–137 | Cite as

Method of ranking of heart valve characteristics at mitral position based on statistical model analysis

  • Makoto Arita
  • Kiyotaka Iwasaki
  • Mitsuo Umezu
  • Masanori Yoshida
  • Tetsuo Fujimoto
  • Hisayoshi Suma
  • Tadashi Isomura
Original Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore a valve selection criterion based on the impact force generated at valve closure, and to test a statistical mathematical model for comparing valve performance. The impact force generated at valve closure in the mitral position was measured continuously, using a load cell mounted in the left atrial section of a mock circulatory system. Eight clinical valves were tested. The data obtained from the in vitro test were subjected to multiregression analysis, to enable systematic comparison of the impact forces of these valves. Further-more, class I quantification, theory was applied to construct the statistical mathematical model. As a result, the following interaction effect was observed in the statistical model. (1) The impact force generated at valve closure had a lower value in valves of smaller diameter. (2) The ranking of 29-mm-diameter valves by impact force was different for the flow region. Under the physiological flow condition of 4–61/min, high impact forces were generated in all valves, in the order Björk-Shiley monostrut, ATS, St. Jude medical, CarboMedics. We consider that low impact force at valve closure is desirable, upon consideration of the influence on the annulus tissue at valve replacement. From these findings, the results of the multiregression analysis provide indications for choosing the optimal value for patients with severe mitral insufficiency (MI).

Key words

In vitro test Prosthetic heart valve Impact force Quantification theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Oury JH, Peterson KL, Folkerth TL, Daily PO. Mitral valve replacement versus reconstruction. An analysis of indications and results of mitral valve procedures in a consecutive series of 80 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977;73:825–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jamieson WR, Miyagishima RT, Grunkemeier GL, Germann E, Henderson C, Fradet GJ, Burr LH, Lichtenstein SV. Bileaflet mechanical prostheses performance in the mitral position. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:786–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Zakow PK, Miller JS, Buttenheim PM, Baumann FG, Culliford AT, Spencer FC, Colvin SB. Choice of mitral prosthesis in the elderly. An analysis of actual outcome. Circulation 1998;98:II116-II119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kobayashi Y, Eishi K, Nagata S, Nakano K, Sasako Y, Kobayashi J, Kosakai Y, Miyatake K. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6(4):404–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cochran RP, Kunzelman KS. Discrepancies between labeled and actual dimensions of prosthetic valves and sizers. J Card Surg 1996;11(5):318–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arita M. Suggestion for the mitral valve reconstruction from biomechanical point of view. Life Support Tech 2000;12(2):24–26 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aoyagi S, Kawara T, Fukunaga S, Mizoguchi T, Nishi Y, Kawano H, Arinaga K. Cineradiographic evaluation of ATS open pivot bileaflet valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:258–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feng Z, Umezu M, Fujimoto T, Tsukahara T, Nurishi M, Kawaguchi D, Masuda S. Analysis of ATS leaflet behavior by in vitro experiment. J Artif Organs 1999;2:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Makoto Arita
    • 1
  • Kiyotaka Iwasaki
    • 1
  • Mitsuo Umezu
    • 1
  • Masanori Yoshida
    • 3
  • Tetsuo Fujimoto
    • 2
  • Hisayoshi Suma
    • 4
  • Tadashi Isomura
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Advanced Research Center for Human SciencesWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Dept of Mechanical EngineeringShibaura Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Shonan Kamakura General HospitalCardiovascular SurgeryKamakuraJapan

Personalised recommendations