Comparison of sprotte and Quincke needles with respect to spinal fluid leakage using artificial spinal cord
- 50 Downloads
This research investigated whether the Sprotte needle causes less leakage of CSF than the Quincke needle in the artificial spinal cord.
The changes in intradural pressure, extradural pressure, and leaked volume of CSF were evaluated following puncture with Sprotte and Quincke needles in the artificial spinal cord.
The decrease in intradural pressure was 9.7±1.8 mm H2O with the Sprotte needle and 20.5±2.7 mm H2O with the Quincke needle (P<0.05). The volume of leakage of artificial CSF was 2.0±0.3 ml with the Sprotte needle and 3.3 ±0.3 ml with the Quincke needle (P<0.01). The extradural pressure increase was 166.1±8.2 mm H2O with the Sprotte needle and 186.8±13.2 mm H2O with the Quincke needle (P<0.05).
The Sprotte needle produces less CSF leakage than the Quincke needle.
Key wordsSpinal anesthesia Spinal fluid Spinal cord
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Vandam LD, Dripps RD (1956) Long term follow-up of patients who received spinal anesthetics. JAMA 16:586–591Google Scholar
- 3.Sprotte G, Schedel R, Pajunk H (1987) An atraumatic needle for single-shot regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth 10:104–108Google Scholar
- 5.Mitchell RA, Loeschcke HH, Severinghaus JW, Richardson BW, Massion WH (1963) Regions of respiratory chemosensitivity on the surface of the medulla. Ann NY Acad Sci 109:661–681Google Scholar