Journal of Artificial Organs

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 143–148 | Cite as

In vitro comparison of steady and pulsatile flow characteristics of jellyfish heart valve

  • Yos S. Morsi
Original Article

Abstract

In examining the hydrodynamic performance of artificial heart valves in vitro, experiments are carried out under either steady or pulsatile flow conditions. Steady flow experiments are simple to set up and analysis of the data is also simple; however, their validity and accuracy have been questioned. In this study, the flow characteristics of jellyfish valves are evaluated and analyzed for steady and pulsatile flow conditions. The analysis is given in terms of velocity and shear stress distributions for a cardiac flow rate of 4.5l/min, and the corresponding steady flow rate is measured at two locations, 0.5D and 1D downstream of the valve face (D being the diameter of the pipe). At the 0.5D location, the velocity profile results obtained for both flow conditions indicated that jetting flow occurred close to the wall, and flow reversal as well as stagnation zones occurred in the core of the valve chamber. These phenomena were also evident in the shear stress profiles for both pulsatile and steady flow conditions. At this location, the maximum difference between the steady and pulsatile values of peak velocity is about 18%. However, the maximum difference between the peak shear stresses was in the range of 5%–7%. At the 1D location, the flow characteristics observed under both the pulsatile and steady flow conditions were almost identical, with a maximum difference between the peak values of less than 4%. From the data presented here, it can be stated that, at least in the initial optimization of the valve hemodynamic performance, the steady hydrodynamic evaluation of the valve could be an effective tool for analyzing the flow characteristics.

Key words

Prosthetic valve Aortic valves Steady flow Pulsatile flow Jellyfish heart valve 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hufnagel CA, Harvey WP, Rabil PJ, McDermott, TF. Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency. Surgery 1954;35:673–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bluestein M, Mockros LF. Haemolytic effects of energy dissipation in flowing blood. Med Biol Eng Comput 1969;7:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoganathan AP, Reamer HH, Corcoran WH, Harrison EC, Shulman IA, Parnassus W. The Starr-Edwards aortic ball valve: flow characteristics, thrombus formation and tissue overgrowth. Artif Organs 1981;5:6–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einav S, Stolero D, Avidor JM, Elad D, Talbot L. LDA evaluation of wall shear stress distribution along the cusp of a tri-leaflet prosthetic heart valve. Proc 4th Int Symp on Application of Laser Anemometry to Fluid Mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal: 1988;7.21.1–3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldwin JT, Tarbell JM. Mean velocities and Reynolds stresses within regurgitant jets produced by tilting disc valves. Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs 1991;37:M348-M349Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Einav S, Reul H, Rau G, Elad D. Shear stress related blood damage along the cusp of a tri-leaflet prosthetic valve. Int J Artif Organs 1991;14:716–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandran KB, Yearwood TLP. Pulsatile flow experiments on heart valve prosthesis. J Med Biol Eng Comput 1983;21:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chandran KB, Cabell GN. Pulsatile flow past aortic valve bioprostheses in a model of human aorta. J Biomech 1984;17:609–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Giersiepen M, Reul H, Stodkilde-Jorgensen H. Turbulent stress measurements downstream of six mechanical aortic valves in a pulsatile flow model. J Biomech 1988;21:631–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Umezu M, Nugent AH, Ye C-X, Chang VP. Hydrodynamic performance of the St. Vincent valve: its suitability for use in artifical hearts. In: Bodnar A, (ed) Surgery for heart disease. London: London University Press, 1988:540–547Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baldwin JT, Tarbell JM. Mean velocities and Reynolds stresses within regurgitant jets produced by tilting disc valves. Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs 1991;37:M348-M349Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teijeira FJ, Mikhail AA. Cardiac valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis: current status and trends. In: Hwang et al. (eds) Advances in cardiovascular engineering. New York: Plenum 1992;197–226Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lei M, van Steenhoven AA, van Campen DH. Experimental and numerical analyses of the steady flow field around an aortic Bjork-Shiley standard valve prosthesis. J Biomech 1992;25:213–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones KC, Tansley CD, Mazumdar J. Computational fluid mechanical evaluation of steady-flow energy losses in cardiac valve prostheses. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 1992;15:193–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Imachi K, Mabuchi K, Chinzei T, Abe Y, Imanishi K, Yonezawa T, Macda K. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a jellyfish valve for practical use. Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs 1989;35:298–301Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sakhaeimanesh AA, Morsi YS. Analysis of regurgitation, mean systolic pressure drop and energy losses for two artificial aortic valves. J Med Eng Tech 1999;22:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morsi YS, Kogure M, Umezu M. In vitro laser Doppler anemometry of pulsatile flow velocity and shear stress measurements down-stream from a jellyfish valve in the mitral position of a ventricular assist device. J Artif Organs 1999;2:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morsi YS, Kogure M, Umezu M. Relative blood damage index for the jellyfish valves and the Bjork-Shiley tilting-disk valve. J Artif Organs 1999;2:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morsi YS, Sakhaeimanesh AA. Hydrodynamic evaluation of three artificial aortic valve chambers. Artif Organs 2000;24:57–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morsi YS, Sakhaeimanesh AA, Clayton BR. Measurements of steady flow velocity and turbulent stress downstream from jellyfish and St. Vincent aortic heart valves. Artif Organs 1999;2:176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Akutsu T, Winona F, Modi VJ. Steady and pulsatile flow field comparison of several prosthetic heart valves inside the simulated left ventricle using two-component LDA system. Waseda International Congress of Modelling and Simulation Technology for Artificial Organs. Tokyo: Shinjuku 1996, August 1–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yos S. Morsi
    • 1
  1. 1.Bio-fluid Dynamics Group, School of Engineering and ScienceSwhiburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations