The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 231–241 | Cite as

Some results in graph theory and their application to abstract relational biology

  • Robert Rosen
Article

Abstract

It has been shown in earlier work that one approach to what Rashevsky has called “abstract biology” is through the study of the class of (\(\mathfrak{M}, \Re \))-systems that can be formed in an arbitrary subcategory of the category of sets. The concept of the (\(\mathfrak{M}, \Re \))-system, however, depends on the availability of mappings that contain other mappings in their range. It is shown that, by introducing an appropriate measure for this property, the problem of characterizing those categories suitable for a rich theory of (\(\mathfrak{M}, \Re \))-systems reduces to a problem familiar from the general theory of graphs. Some new results in these directions are obtained, and it is then shown that any category with mappings that possess properties we might expect to hold in the physical world will also admit a rich theory of (\(\mathfrak{M}, \Re \))-systems. In particular, it is shown that a sufficiently large family of mappings drawn at random from such a category will with overwhelming probability contain an (\(\mathfrak{M}, \Re \))-system.

Keywords

Factorial Restriction Multivalued Function Effective Process Finite Union Rich Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Berge, Claude. 1962.The Theory of Graphs and its Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. de Bruijn, N. G. and P. Erdös. 1951. “A Color Problem for Infinite Graphs and a Problem in the Theory of Relations.”Indigationes Mathematicae,13, 371–373.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Erdös, Paul. 1950. “Some Remarks on Set Theory.”Proc. American Math. Soc.,1, 127–141.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Rosen, R. 1959. “On a Paradox Implicit in the Theory of a Self-Reproducing Automaton.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,21, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. — 1962a. “A Note on Abstract Relational Biologies.”ibid.,24, 31–38.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. —. 1962b. “Church's Thesis and its Relation to the Concept of Realizability in Biology and Physics.”ibid.,24, 375–393.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Chicago 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Rosen
    • 1
  1. 1.Committee on Mathematical BiologyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations