Advertisement

The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 317–341 | Cite as

The representation of biological systems from the standpoint of the theory of categories

  • Robert Rosen
Article

Abstract

A mathematical framework for a rigorous theory of general systems is constructed, using the notions of the theory of Categories and Functors introduced by Eilenberg and MacLane (1945,Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,58, 231–94). A short discussion of the basic ideas is given, and their possible application to the theory of biological systems is discussed. On the basis of these considerations, a number of results are proved, including the possibility of selecting a unique representative (a “canonical form”) from a family of mathematical objects, all of which represent the same system. As an example, the representation of the neural net and the finite automaton is constructed in terms of our general theory.

Keywords

Biological System Block Diagram Covariant Functor Oriented Graph Oriented Edge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Chevalley, C. 1956.Fundamental Concepts of Algebra. New York: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Eilenberg, S. 1957.Categories and Fiber Bundles. Mimeographed Lecture Notes, (Unpublished, The University of Chicago.)Google Scholar
  3. Eilenberg, S. and S. MacLane. 1945. “General Theory of Natural Equivalences”,Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 58, 231–94.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kleene, S. C. 1955. “Representation of Events in Nerve Nets”, Automata Studies, Annals of Mathematics Studies, #34, 3–41. (Ed. C. E. Shannon and J. McCarthy.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. McCulloch, W. and W. Pitts. 1943. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,10, 1–10.Google Scholar
  6. Neumann, J. von 1951. “The General and Logical Theory of Automata”.Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (Ed. Lloyd A. Jeffress.) New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. — 1955. “Probabilistic Logics and the Synthesis of Reliable Organisms From Unreliable Components”.Automata Studies, Annals of Mathematics Studies, #34 43–98. (Ed. C. E. Shannon and J. McCarthy.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Rashevsky, N. 1954. “Topology and Life”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 317–48.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosen, R. 1958. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 245–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Chicago 1958

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Rosen
    • 1
  1. 1.Committee on Mathematical BiologyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations