Advertisement

The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 257–278 | Cite as

Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane

  • Richard FitzHugh
Article

Abstract

The types of mathematical model which have been used to represent all-or-none behavior in the nerve membrane may be classified as follows: (1) thediscontinuous threshold phenomenon, in which differential equations with discontinuous functions provide both a discontinuity of response as a function of stimulus intensity at threshold and a finite maximum latency, (2) thesingular-point threshold phenomenon which exists in a phase space having analytic functions in its differential equations and having a singular point with one characteristic root positive and the rest with negative real parts, the latency being unbounded, and (3) thequasi threshold phenomenon, which has a finite maximum latency and continuous functions, but neither a true discontinuity in response nor an exact threshold. Several models of the nerve membrane in the literature are classified accordingly, and the applicability of the different types of threshold phenomena to the membrane is discussed, including an extension to a stochastic model.

Keywords

Phase Space Singular Point Saddle Point Phase Plane Squid Giant Axon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Blair, E. and J. Erlanger. 1933. “A Comparison of the Characteristics of Axons through their Individual Electrical Responses”.Am. Jour. Physiol.,106, 524–64.Google Scholar
  2. Bonhoeffer, K. F. 1941. “Über die Aktivierung von Passiven Eisen in Salpetersaüre.”Ztschr. für Elektrochemie,47, 147–50.Google Scholar
  3. — 1948. “Activation of Passive Iron as a Model for the Excitation of Nerve.”Jour. Gen. Physiol.,32, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. — 1953. “Modelle der Nervenerregung.”Die Naturwissenschaften,40, 301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole, K. S. 1949. “Dynamic Electrical Characteristics of the Squid Axon Membrane.”Arch. Sci. Physiol.,3, 253–58.Google Scholar
  6. — 1954. “Membrane Excitation of the Hodgkin-Huxley Axon.”Fed. Proc.,13, 28.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, K. S., H. A. Antosiewicz, and P. Rabinowitz. 1955. “Automatic Computation of Nerve Excitation.”Jour. Indust. Appl. Math. In press.Google Scholar
  8. Fatt, P. and B. Katz. 1952. “Spontaneous Subthreshold Activity at Motor Nerve Endings.”Jour. Physiol.,117, 109–28.Google Scholar
  9. Hill, A. V. 1936. “Excitation and Accommodation in Nerve.”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B.,119, 305–55.Google Scholar
  10. Hodgkin, A. L. 1952. “Measurement of Current-Voltage Relations in the Membrane of the Giant Axon ofLoligo.”Jour. Physiol.,116, 424–48.Google Scholar
  11. — and A. F. Huxley. 1952. “A Quantitative Description of Membrane Current and Its Application to Conduction and Excitation in Nerve.”Jour. Physiol.,117, 500–544.Google Scholar
  12. ——, and B. Katz. 1949. “Ionic Currents Underlying Activity in the Giant Axon of the Squid.”Arch. Sci. Physiol.,3, 129–50.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, F. H., H. Eyring, and M. J. Polissar. 1954.The Kinetic Basis of Molecular Biology. New York: J. Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, J. B. 1928. “Thermal Agitation of Electricity in Conductors.”Phys. Rev.,32, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karreman, C. 1951. “Contributions to the Mathematical Biology of Excitation with Particular Emphasis on Changes in Membrane Permeability and on Threshold Phenomena.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,13, 189–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. — and H. D. Landahl. 1952. “On the Mathematical Biology of Excitation Phenomena.”Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.,17, 293–97.Google Scholar
  17. — and —. 1953. “On Spontaneous Discharges Obtained from a Physicochemical Model of Excitation”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,15, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lefschetz, S. 1948.Lectures on Differential Equations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Lotka, A. J. 1925.Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Marmont, G. 1949. “Studies on the Axon Membrane. I. A New Method.”Jour. Cell. Comp. Physiol.,34, 351–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Minorsky, N. 1947.Introduction to Non-linear Mechanics. Ann Arbor: J. W. Edwards.Google Scholar
  22. Nyquist, H. 1928. “Thermal Agitation of Electrical Charge in Conductors.”Phys. Rev.,32, 110–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Offner, F., A. Weinberg, and G. Young. 1940. “Nerve Conduction Theory: Some Mathematical Consequences of Bernstein's Model.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,2, 89–103.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pecher, C. 1939. “La Fluctuation d'Excitabilité de la Fibre Nerveuse.”Arch. Internat. Physiol.,49, 129–52.Google Scholar
  25. Petrowsky, I. 1934. “Über das Verhalten der Integralkurven eines Systems gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen in der Nähe eines singulären Punktes.”Recueil Math.,41, 107–56.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Rashevsky, N. 1933. “Outline of a Physico-mathematical Theory of Excitation and Inhibition.”Protoplasma,20, 42–56.Google Scholar
  27. — 1948.Mathematical Biophysics. Rev. Ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. — 1954. “Topology and Life: In Search of General Mathematical Principles in Biology and Sociology”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 317–48.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Rushton, W. A. H. 1938. “Initiation of the Propagated Disturbance”.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B.,124, 210–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Chicago 1955

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard FitzHugh
    • 1
  1. 1.Wilmer InstituteJohns Hopkins HospitalBaltimore

Personalised recommendations