Advertisement

The bulletin of mathematical biophysics

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 493–499 | Cite as

Turing’s morphogens, two-factor systems and active transport

  • Robert Rosen
Article

Abstract

It is shown that Turing’s theory of morphogenesis and Rashevsky’s two-factor models are closely related, both being instances of diffusion-reaction schemes. It is further shown that the morphogenetic character of such schemes invariably gives rise to an apparent active transport, and indeed that it is on this transport that the morphogenetic properties of reaction-diffusion models depends. Some relations between the above and two-factor descriptions of other biological processes are briefly discussed.

Keywords

Reactive Part Mathematical Biophysics Diffusive Part Cellular Aggregate Specific Linear Combination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Fitzhugh, R. 1955. “Mathematical Models of Threshold Phenomena in the Nerve Membrane.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,17, 257–278.Google Scholar
  2. Hill, A. V. 1935. “Advances of Modern Biology.” (Biomedgiz, Moscow, USSR),4, 131.Google Scholar
  3. — 1936Proc. Roy. Soc. London,B,120, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Karreman, G. 1951. “Contributions to the Mathematical Biology of Excitation with Particular Emphasis on Changes in Membrane Permeability and on Threshold Phenomena.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,13, 189–243.Google Scholar
  5. Rashevsky, N. 1933. “Outline of a Physico-Mathematical Theory of Excitation and Inhibition.Protoplasma,20, 42.Google Scholar
  6. — 1939. “On the So Called Plasticity of the Central Nervous System.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,1, 93–94.Google Scholar
  7. Rashevsky, N. 1940a. “An Approach to the Mathematical Biophysics of Biological Self-Regulation and of Cell Polarity.”Ibid.,2, 15–25.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. — 1940b. “Contributions to the Mathematical Biophysics of Organic Form. I. Formation of Cavities in Cellular Aggregates.Ibid.,2, 27–36.Google Scholar
  9. — 1940c. “Further Contributions to the Theory of Cell Polarity and Self-Regulation.Ibid.,2, 65–67.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. — 1940d. “Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Organic Form II. Asymmetsic Metabolim of Cellular Aggregates,”Ibid.,2, 69–72.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. — 1940e. “Physicomathematical Aspects of Some Problems of Organic Form.Ibid.,2, 109–121.Google Scholar
  12. — 1940f. “Contributions to the Mathematical Biophysics of Organic Form III. Deformation of Shell Shaped Cellular Aggregates,”Ibid.,2, 123–126.Google Scholar
  13. — 1960.Mathematical Biophysics, New York: Dover Publications.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosen, R. 1959. “A Quantum-Theoretic Approach to Genetic Problems.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,22, 227–255.Google Scholar
  15. — 1966. “Biological and Physical Realizations of Abstract Metabolic Models.”Helgoländer Wiss. Meeresunters,14, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. — 1967. “Two-Factor Models, Neural Nets and Biochemical Automata.”J. Theoret. Biol.,15, 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosen, R. 1968a. “Recent Developments in the Theory of Control and Regulation of Cellular Processes.”Int. Revs. of Cytology, to appear.Google Scholar
  18. — 1968b. “On Analogous Systems.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,30, 481–492.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Turing, A. M. 1952. “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,B,237, 37–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© N. Rashevsky 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Rosen
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Theoretical BiologyState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations