Environmental Management

, 19:559

Hydrologic modeling as a predictive basis for ecological restoration of salt marshes

  • Charles T. Roman
  • Richard W. Garvine
  • John W. Portnoy


Roads, bridges, causeways, impoundments, and dikes in the coastal zone often restrict tidal flow to salt marsh ecosystems. A dike with tide control structures, located at the mouth of the Herring River salt marsh estuarine system (Wellfleet, Massachusetts) since 1908, has effectively restricted tidal exchange, causing changes in marsh vegetation composition, degraded water quality, and reduced abundance of fish and macroinvertebrate communities. Restoration of this estuary by reintroduction of tidal exchange is a feasible management alternative. However, restoration efforts must proceed with caution as residential dwellings and a golf course are located immediately adjacent to and in places within the tidal wetland. A numerical model was developed to predict tide height levels for numerous alternative openings through the Herring River dike. Given these model predictions and knowledge of elevations of flood-prone areas, it becomes possible to make responsible decisions regarding restoration. Moreover, tidal flooding elevations relative to the wetland surface must be known to predict optimum conditions for ecological recovery. The tide height model has a universal role, as demonstrated by successful application at a nearby salt marsh restoration site in Provincetown, Massachusetts. Salt marsh restoration is a valuable management tool toward maintaining and enhancing coastal zone habitat diversity. The tide height model presented in this paper will enable both scientists and resource professionals to assign a degree of predictability when designing salt marsh restoration programs.

Key Words

Salt marsh Habitat restoration Hydrologic modeling Massachusetts 

Literature Cited

  1. Ayvazian, S. G., L. A. Deegan, and J. T. Finn 1992. Comparison of habitat use by estuarine fish assemblages in the Acadian to Virginian zoogeographic provinces.Estuaries 15:368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, N. E., and W. A. Niering. 1993 Tidal marsh restoration: trends in vegetation change using a geographical information system (GIS).Restoration Ecology 1:18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahl, T. E.. 1990. Wetlands losses in the United States, 1780's to 1980's. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 21 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Daiber, F. C.. 1986. Conservation of tidal marshes. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 341 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Fell, P. E., N. C. Olmstead, E. Carlson, W. Jacob, D. Hitchock, and G. Silber. 1982 Distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates on certain Connecticut tidal marshes, with emphasis on dominant molluscs.Estuaries 5:234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fell, P. E., K. A. Murphy, M. A. Peck, and M. L. Recchia. 1991 Re-establishment ofMelampus bidentatus (Say) and other macroinvertebrates on a restored impounded tidal marsh: comparison of populations above and below the impoundment dike.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 152:33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrigno, F., J. K. Shisler, J. Hansen, and P. Slavin, 1987. Tidal restoration of salt hay impoundments. Pages 283–297in W. R. Whitman and W. H. Meredith (eds.), Waterfowl and wetlands symposium: Proceedings of a symposium on waterfowl and wetlands management in the coastal Zone of the Atlantic flyway. Delaware Coastal Zone Management Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dover, Delaware.Google Scholar
  8. Fitterman, D. V., and K. F. Dennehy. 1991. Vertification of geophysically determined depths to saltwater near the Herring River (Cape Cod National Seashore), Wellfleet, Massachusetts. Open-File Report 91-321, US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, 47 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Jordan, W. R., R. L. Peters, and E. B. Allen. 1988 Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity.Environmental Management 12:55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kusler, J. A. and M. E. Kentula (eds.). 1990. Wetland creation and restoration: The status of the science. Island Press, Washington, DC, 594 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Kusler, J. A., M. L. Quammen, and G. Brooks (eds.) 1988. Proceedings of the national wetland symposium: Mitigation of impacts and losses. Association of State Wetlands Managers, Technical Report 3, Berne, New York, 460 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Linsley, R. K. and J. B. Franzini. 1979. Water resources engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, 716 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Montague, C. L., A. V. Zale, and H. F. Percival. 1987. Ecological effects of coastal marsh impoundments: A review.Environmental Management 11:743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 552 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Peck, M. A., P. E. Fell, E. A. Allen, J. A. Gieg, C. R. Guthke, and M. D. Newkirk 1994. Evaluation of tidal marsh restoration: Comparison of selected macroinvertebrate populations on a restored impounded valley marsh and an unimpounded valley marsh within the same system in Connecticut, USA.Environmental Management 18:283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Portnoy, J. W. 1984 Salt marsh diking and nuisance mosquito production on Cape Cod, Massachusetts.Mosquito News 44:560–564.Google Scholar
  17. Portnoy, J. W. 1991. Summer oxygen depletion in a diked New England estuary.Estuaries 14:122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Portnoy, J. W., C. T. Roman, and M. A. Soukup. 1987. Hydrologic and chemical impacts of diking and drainage of a small estuary: Effects on wildlife and fisheries. Pages 253–267in W. R. Whitman and W. H. Meredith (eds.), Waterfowl and wetlands symposium: Proceedings of a symposium on waterfowl and wetlands management in the coastal zone of the Atlantic flyway. Delaware Coastal Zone Management Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dover, Delaware.Google Scholar
  19. Roman, C. T. 1987. An evaluation of alternatives for estuarine restoration management: the Herring River ecosystem (Cape Cod National Seashore). Technical report, National Park Service Cooperative Research Unit, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 304 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Roman, C. T., W. A. Niering, and R. S. Warren. 1984 Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restriction.Environmental Management 8:141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sinicrope, T. L., P. G. Hine, R. S. Warren, and W. A. Niering. 1990. Restoration of an impounded salt marsh in New England.Estuaries 13:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soukup, M. A. and J. W. Portnoy. 1986 Impacts from mosquito control-induced sulphur mobilization in a Cape Cod estuary.Environmental Conservation 13:47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Teal, J. M. 1986. The ecology of regularly flooded salt marshes of New England: A community profile. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 85 (7.4), Washington, DC, 61 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, DC, 59 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Wolf, R. B., L. C. Lee, and R. R. Sharitz. 1986. Wetland creation and restoration in the United States from 1970 to 1985: An annotated bibliography.Wetlands 6:i-88.Google Scholar
  26. Zedler, J. B. 1988. Restoring diversity in salt marshes: Can we do it? Pages 317–325in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Zedler, J. B. 1992. Restoring cordgrass marshes in southern California. Pages 7–51in G. W. Thayer (ed.), Restoring the Nation's marine environment. Maryland Sea Grant College, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles T. Roman
    • 1
  • Richard W. Garvine
    • 2
  • John W. Portnoy
    • 3
  1. 1.National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit Graduate School of OceanographyUniversity of Rhode IslandNarragansettUSA
  2. 2.Graduate College of Marine StudiesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  3. 3.National Park ServiceCape Cod National SeashoreMassachusettsSouth WellfleetUSA

Personalised recommendations