Journal für Ornithologie

, Volume 143, Issue 1, pp 82–97

Osteological evidence for paraphyly of the avian order Caprimulgiformes (nightjars and allies)

  • Gerald Mayr
Article

Summary

The first phylogenetic analysis of osteological characters in the Caprimulgiformes (nightjars and allies) provides strong evidence that this order is paraphyletic. Well supported is monophyly of a clade comprising Caprimulgidae, Nyctibiidae, Aegothelidae and the traditional Apodiformes (swifts and hummingbirds). Within this clade Nyctibiidae (potoos) and Caprimulgidae (nightjars) on the one hand, and Aegothelidae (owlet-nightjars) and the traditional Apodiformes on the other are sister taxa. Whereas monophyly of Nyctibiidae and Caprimulgidae is in accordance with most previous studies, monophyly of the so far poorly studied Aegothelidae and the traditional Apodiformes has not been suggested by previous authors. The affinities of the Steatornithidae (oilbirds) and Podargidae (frog-mouths) cannot be conclusively resolved at present.

Keywords

Phylogeny Caprimulgiformes Apodiformes Aegothelidae osteology 

Osteologische Hinweise auf Paraphylie der Vogelordnung Caprimulgiformes (Schwalmv:ogel)

Zusammenfassung

Die erste phylogenetische Analyse der Caprimulgiformes (Schwalmvögel) aufgrund osteologischer Merkmale liefert deutliche Hinweise auf eine Paraphylie dieser Ordnung. Gut gestützt ist die Monophylie eines Taxons, das Caprimulgidae, Nyctibiidae, Aegothelidae und die traditionelle Ordnung Apodiformes (Segler und Kolibris) beinhaltet. Innerhalb dieser Gruppe sind Nyctibiidae (Tagschläfer) und Caprimulgidae (Ziegenmelker) auf der einen Seite, sowie Aegothelidae (Höhlenschwalme) und die traditionellen Apodiformes auf der anderen Seite monophyletisch. Während Monophylie von Nyctibiidae und Caprimulgidae im Einklang mit den meisten bisherigen Untersuchungen steht, wurde eine Monophylie der bisher kaum untersuchten Aegothelidae und der traditionellen Apodiformes noch nicht vorgeschlagen. Die großsystematische Stellung der Steatornithidae (Fettschwalme) und Podargidae (Eulenschwalme) kann zur Zeit nicht überzeugend begründet werden.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumel, J. J. & Witmer, L. M. (1993): Osteologia. In: Baumel, J. J., King, A. S., Breazile, J. E., Evans, H. E. & Vanden Berge, J. C. (Eds.): Handbook of avian anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club 23: 45–132.Google Scholar
  2. Beddard, F.E. (1886): On the Syrinx and other Points in the Anatomy of the Caprimulgidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1886: 147–153.Google Scholar
  3. Bleiweiss, R., Kirsch, J. A. W. & LaPointe, F. J. (1994): DNA-DNA hybridization based phylogeny for “higher” nonpasserines: Reevaluating a key portion of the avian family tree. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3: 248–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bühler, P. (1970): Schädelmorphologie und Kiefermechanik der Caprimulgidae (Aves). Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere 66: 337–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton, P.J.K. (1971): Some observations on the splenius capitis muscle of birds. Ibis 113: 19–28.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, H.L. (1901): The pterylosis ofPodargus: with notes on the pterylography of the Caprimulgi. Auk 18: 167–171.Google Scholar
  7. Cohn, J. M. W. (1968): The convergent flight mechanism of swifts (Apodi) and hummingbirds (Trochili) (Aves). PhD dissertation University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, C. T. (1976): Two New Species ofAegialornis from France, with Comments on the Ordinal Affinities of the Aegialornithidae. In: Olson, S. L. (Ed.): -Collected Papers in Avian Paleontology Honoring the 90th Birthday of Alexander Wetmore. Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiol. 27: 121–127.Google Scholar
  9. Cracraft, J. (1981): Toward a phylogenetic classification of the recent birds of the world (Class Aves). Auk 98: 681–714.Google Scholar
  10. Cracraft; J. (1988): The major Glades of birds. In: Benton, M. J. (Ed.): The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Volume 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds: 339–361 Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Cracraft, J. (2001): Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 268: 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elzanowski, A., Paul, G. S. & Stidham, T. A. (2000): An avian quadrate from the Late Cretaceous Lance, Formation of Wyoming. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 712–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ericson, P. G. P. (1997): Systematic relationships of the palaeogene family Presbyomithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 429–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Espinosa de los Monteros, A. (2000): Higher-level Phylogeny of Trogoniformes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14: 20–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fürbringer, M. (1888): Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vögel, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Anatomie der Stütz- und Bewegungsorgane, vol. 2.: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Harshman, J. (1994): Reweaving the tapestry: What can we learn from Sibley and Ahlquist (1990)? Auk 111: 377–388.Google Scholar
  17. Hennig, W. (1950): Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. Holyoak, D. T. (1999): Family Aegothelidac (Owletnightjars). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.): Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol. 5: 252–265, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  19. Houde, P. (1987): Critical evaluation of DNA hybridization studies, in avian systematics. Auk 104: 17–32.Google Scholar
  20. Huxley, T. H. (1867): On the Classification of Birds; and on the Taxonomic Value of the Modifications of certain of the Cranial Bones observable in that Class. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1867:415–472.Google Scholar
  21. Johansson, U. S., Parsons, T. J., Irestedt, M., & Ericson, P. G. P. (2001): Clades within the ‘higher land birds’, evaluated by nuclear DNA sequences. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 39: 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karhu, A. (1988): Novoye semeystvo strizheobraznykh iz paleogena Yevropy [A new family of swift-like birds from the Paleogene of Europe]. Paleont. Jour. 3: 78–88.Google Scholar
  23. Karhu, A. (1992): Morphological Divergence within the Order Apodiformes as Revealed by the Structure of the Humerus. In: Campbell, K. E. (Ed.): Papers in Avian Paleontology honoring Pierce Brodkorb. Natur. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., Sci. Ser. 36: 379–384.Google Scholar
  24. Karhu, A. (1999): A New Genus and Species of the Family Jungornithidae (Apodiformes) from the Late Eocene of the Northern Caucasus, with Comments on the Ancestry of Hummingbirds. In: Olson, S. L. (ed.): Avian Paleontology at the Close of the 20th Century: Proceedings of the 4th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Washington, D. C., 4–7 June 1996. Smithson. Comr. Paleobiol. 89: 207–216.Google Scholar
  25. Kitto, G. B. & Wilson, A. C. (1966): Evolution of malate dehydrogenase in birds. Science 153: 1408–1410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lanyon, S. M. (1992): Review of Sibley and Ahlquist’s “Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. A Study in Molecular Evolution”. Condor 94: 304–310.Google Scholar
  27. Lowe, P. R. (1939): On the Systematic position of the Swifts (Suborder Cypseli) and Hummingbirds (Suborder Trochili), with special reference to their Relation to the Order Passeriformes. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 24 (4): 307–348.Google Scholar
  28. Mariaux, J. & Braun, M. J. (1996): A Molecular Phylogenetic Survey of the Nightjars and Allies (Caprimulgiformes) with Special Emphasis on the Potoos (Nyctibiidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:228–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayr, G. (1999): Caprimulgiform birds from the Middle Eocene of Messel (Hessen, Germany). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayr, G. (2001): Comments on the osteology ofMasillapodargus longipes Mayr 1999 andParaprefica major Mayr 1999, caprimulgiform birds from the Middle Eocene of Messel (Hessen, Germany). N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh. 2001: 65–76.Google Scholar
  31. Mayr, G. & Daniels, M. (in press): A new short-legged landbird from the early Eocene of Wyoming and contemporaneous European sites. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 46 (3).Google Scholar
  32. Mindell, D. P., Dorenson, M. D., Huddleston, C. J., Miranda, H. C. Jr., Knight, A., Sawchuk, S. J. & Yuri, T. (1997): Phylogenetic Relationships among and within Select Avian Orders Based on Mitochondrial DNA. In: Mindell, D. P (Ed.): Avian Molecular Evolution and Systematics: 213–247. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  33. Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1980): The Archaeotrogonidae from the Eocene and Oligocene deposits of “Phosphorites du Quercy”, France. In: Campbell, K. E. (Ed.): Papers in avian paleontology honoring Hildegarde Howard. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions to Science 330:17–31.Google Scholar
  34. Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1988a): Les Aegialornithidae (Aves: Apodiformes) des Phosphorites du Quercy. Comparaison avec la forme de Messel. Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 107: 369–381.Google Scholar
  35. Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1988b): Le gisement du Bretou (Phosphorites du Quercy, Tarn-et-Garonne, France) et sa faune de vertébrés de l’Eocène supérieur. II Oiseaux. Palaeontographica (A) 205: 29–50.Google Scholar
  36. Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1989): Les Caprimulgiformes et les Coraciiformes de l’Eocène et de l’Oligocène des Phosphorites du Quercy et description de deux genres nouveaux de Podargidae et Nyctibiidae. In: Ouellet, H. (ed.): Acta XIX congressus internationalis ornithologici: 2047–2055; Ottawa (University of Ottawa Press).Google Scholar
  37. Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1995): Les Garouillas et les sites contemporains (Oligocène, MP 25) des Phosphorites du Quercy (Lot, Tarn-et-Garonne, France) et leurs faunes de Vertébrés. 3. Oiseaux. Palaeontographica (A) 236: 33–38.Google Scholar
  38. Olson, S. L. (1985): The fossil record of birds. In: Farner, D. S., King, J. R. & Parkes, K. C. (Eds.): Avian Biology. 8: 79–238. New York.Google Scholar
  39. Olson, S. L. (1987): An early Eocene oilbird from the Green River Formation of Wyoming (Caprimulgiformes: Steatornithidae). Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon 99: 57–69.Google Scholar
  40. Olson, S. L. (1999): Early Eocene Birds from Eastern North America: A Faunule from the Nanjemoy Formation of Virginia. In: Weems, R. E. & Grimsley, G. J. (Eds.): Early Eocene Vertebrates and Plants from the Fisher/Sullivan Site (Nanjemoy Formation) Stafford County, Virginia. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources Publication 152:123–132.Google Scholar
  41. Peters, D. S. (1985): Ein neuer Segler aus der Grube Messel und seine Bedeutung für den Status der Aegialornithidae (Aves: Apodiformes). Senckenbergiana lethaea 66: 143–164.Google Scholar
  42. Rich, P. V. & McEvey, A. (1977): A new owletnightjar from the early to mid-Miocene of eastern New South Wales. Memoires of the National Museum of Victoria 38: 247–253.Google Scholar
  43. Serventy, D. L. (1985): Owlet-Frogmouth. In: Campbell, B. & Lack, E. (Eds.): A Dictionary of Birds: 421–422. Calton.Google Scholar
  44. Sharpe, R. B. (1900): A hand-list of the genera and species of birds. Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
  45. Shufeldt, R. W. (1885): Contribution to the Comparative Osteology of theTrochilidae, Caprimulgidae, andCypselidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1885: 886–915.Google Scholar
  46. Sibley, C. G. & Ahlquist, J. E. (1990): Phylogeny and classification of birds: A study in molecular evolution. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  47. Stegmann, B. (1963): Der Processus internus indicis im Skelett des Vogelflügels. J. Ornithol. 104: 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stresemann, E. (1927-34): Aves. In: Kükenthal, W. & Krumbach, T. (Eds.): Handbuch der Zoologie. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar
  49. Swofford, D. L. (1993): PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.Google Scholar
  50. Vanden Berge, J. C. & Zweers, G. A. (1993): Myologia. In: Baumel, J. J., King, A. S., Breazile, J. E., Evans, H. E. & Vanden Berge, J. C. (Eds.): Handbook of avian anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club 23:189–247.Google Scholar
  51. Verheyen, R. (1956): Les Striges, les Trogones et les Caprimulgi dans la systématique moderne. Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique 32 (3): 1–31.Google Scholar
  52. Wetmore, A. (1919): On the anatomy ofNyctibius with notes on allied birds. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 54: 577–586.Google Scholar
  53. Wetmore, A. (1960): A classification for the birds of the world. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 139 (11): 1–37.Google Scholar
  54. Zusi, R. L. & Bentz, G. D. (1984): Myology of the Purple-throated Carib (Eulampis jugularis) and Other Hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 385: 1–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft/Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Mayr
    • 1
  1. 1.Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Sektion für OrnithologieFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations