Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 75–87 | Cite as

The scientific wealth of European nations: Taking effectiveness into account

  • Sandra Rousseau
  • R. Rousseau
Article

Abstract

In this study we continue the application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the R&D effort of European countries. We use GDP, active population and R&D expenditure as inputs, and publications and patents as outputs. Being effective means that, in order to obtain a maximum efficiency score countries are forced to perform on every output goal. A discussion of each country's performance and a comparison with May'sScience results concludes our analysis.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis Efficiency Frontier European Patent Weighted Input European Patent Office 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. U. Raymond, (Ed.), Science-based economic development,Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 798. The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Rousseau, R. Rousseau, Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators,Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,European Journal of Operations Research, 2(6) (1978) 429–444.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Norman, B. Stoker,Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance, Wiley & Sons, Chicester, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Vinkler, General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators. In:Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 1997,Peritz and Egghe, (Eds), pp. 463–472.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Pedraja-Chaparro, J. Salinas-Jimenez, P. Smith, On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis,Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8 (1997) 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Z. Degraeve, M. Lambrechts, V. Van Puyenbroeck, Een vergelijkende prestatiestudie van de departmenten van de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management, 41 (1996) 165–193.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Patent Office,Annual Report 1993, München-Den Haag-Berlin-Wien.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    United Nations,Statistical Yearbook, 40th issue, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Cunningham, L. Schrage,LINGO: An Optimization Modeling Language, LINDO Systems, Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. M. May, The scientific wealth of nations,Science, 275 (1997) 793–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, G. Van Hooydonk (work in progress).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. Gomez, M. Bordons, J. Cami, Science by the country (letter),Science, 276 (1997) 884–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Rey, M.-J. Martin, L. Plaza, J.-J. Ibanez, I. Mendez, Changes in publishing behavior in response to research policy guidelines: the case of the Spanish research council in the field of agronomy. In:Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 1997,Peritz and Egghe (Eds) 351–360.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Swinbanks, R. Nathan, Western assessment meets Asian cultures,Nature, 389 (1997) 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Johnes, J. Johnes, Apples and oranges: the aggregation problem in publications analysis,Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. E. Beasley, Determining teaching and research efficiencies,Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46 (1995) 441–452.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Rousseau
    • 1
  • R. Rousseau
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.K.U. LeuvenCentre for Economic Studies (CES)Leuven(Belgium)
  2. 2.KHBOOostendeBelgium
  3. 3.LUCDiepenbeek(Belgium)

Personalised recommendations