An abundance model resource appraisal for some Canadian commodities

  • Robert G. Garrett
Article

Abstract

An abundance model resource appraisal has been undertaken for 10 mineral commodities in Canada: nickel, copper, zinc, lead, molybdenum, uranium, silver, gold, chromium, and tin. The purpose of the appraisal was to investigate the applicability of the model to the Canadian situation. Resource appraisals for the first 6 of the commodities studied have been published following deposit modeling studies. For many other commodities studied have been published following deposit modeling appraisals. The demonstration of the relevance of the abundance model to Canada would allow its application in such cases. The data presented in this paper indicate that the approximate relation, resource (short tons)=abundance (%)×1010. holds true for all commodities studied except chromium and tin. As the resources versus abundances relationship observed on a global scale is observable in Canada, it is concluded that Canada is a sufficiently large fraction (∼7%) of the earth's continental crust to represent a valid sample of that crust. Canada appears to be relatively well endowed with resources of copper, molybdenum, lead, and zinc, and poorly endowed with chromium and tin. It is proposed that the intersection of national boundaries with the boundaries of the world's metallogenic provinces is of greater importance than the intensity of past search, a feature that has been suggested in other studies. If these areas overlap, a nation may be self sufficient in a commodity: if they do not, the nation must import, or find a nationally available substitute. The sources of information used in the appraisal are outlined together with an analysis of the problems encounterea and the time requirements.

Key words

geochemistry crustal abundance resource analysis 

References

  1. Boyle, R. W., 1968. The geochemistry of silver and its deposits; Geol. Surv. Can. Bull. v. 160, 264 p.Google Scholar
  2. Boyle, R. W., in press. The geochemistry of gold and its deposits: Geol. Surv. Can. Bull. 280.Google Scholar
  3. Brinck, J. W., 1976. Critical parameters for the production, depletion and substitution of mineral resources—a horizon beyond the limits to growth. Ceol. en Mijnb., V 55(3–4), p. 185–194.Google Scholar
  4. Brobst. D. A. and Pratt, W. P., 1973, United States mineral resources: U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 820. 722 p.Google Scholar
  5. Cargill, S. M., Meyer, R. F., Picklyk, D. D., and Urquidi, F., 1977. Summary of resource assessment methods resulting from the International Geological Correlation Program Project 98: Math. Geol., v. 9(3), p. 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cranstone, D. A. and Hamilton, S. A. 1976, Canadian reserves of copper, nickel, lead, zinc, molybdenum, silver and gold, Jan. 1, 1974 and Jan. 1, 1975: Mineral Bulletin MR166, 39 p.Google Scholar
  7. Douglas, R. J. W., 1970, Geology and economic minerals of Canada: Geol. Surv. Can. Econ. Geol. Rep. 1, 838 p.Google Scholar
  8. Dominion Bureau of Statistics. 1957, Canadian mineral statistics, 1886–1956: Reference Paper No. 68, 120 p.Google Scholar
  9. Engelhardt, W. V., 1975, Resources and reserves of metals. Resources Policy, v. 1(4), p. 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Energy, Mines and Resources, Canada, 1977. A summary view of Canadian reserves and additional resources of nickel, copper, zinc, lead and molybdenum: Mineral Bulletin MR169, 23 p.Google Scholar
  11. Erickson, R. L., 1973. Crustal abundance of elements, and mineral reserves and resources,in United States mineral resources, Brobst. D. A. and Pratt, W. P. (eds.): U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 820 (0, 21–25), 722 p.Google Scholar
  12. Flawn, P. T., 1966, Mineral resources: Rand McNally, 406 p.Google Scholar
  13. Garrett, R. G., 1977. Exploration geochemistry in resource appraisal: Math. Geol., v. 9(3), p. 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. George, J. G., 1977. Silver: Can. Min. Jour. v. 98(2), p. 75–83.Google Scholar
  15. Govett, G. J. S. and Govett, M. H., 1972. Mineral resource supplies and the limits of economic growth: Earth-Sci. Rev., v. 8(3), p. 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Govett, G. J. S. and Govett, M. H., 1976, Defining and measuring world mineral supplies,in World mineral supplies, assessment and perspective, Govett, G. J. S. and Govett, M. H. (eds.): Elsevier (p. 13–26), 472 p.Google Scholar
  17. Hogan, J. J., 1977, Gold: Can. Min. Jour., v. 98(2), p. 83–89.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, Tan and Yao, Chi-Lung, 1970, A bundance of chemical elements in the earth's crust and its major tectonics units. Int. Geol. Rev., v. 12(7), p. 778–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McKelvey, V. E., 1960. Relation of reserves of the elements to their crustal abundance: An. J. Sci., v, 258-A, p. 234–241.Google Scholar
  20. McKelvey, V. E., 1972. Mineral resource estimates and public policy: Am. Scientist, v. 60(1), p. 32–40.Google Scholar
  21. McKelvey, V. E., 1973, Mineral resource estimates and public policy,in United States mineral resources, Brobst, D. A. and Pratt, W. P. (eds.): U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 820 (p. 9–19) 722 p.Google Scholar
  22. Ovchinnikov, L. N., 1971, Estimate of world resources of metals in terrestrial deposits: Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R., v. 196(1–6), p. 200–203.Google Scholar
  23. Ruzicka, V., 1977, National favourability studies. Canada. Unpublished Intl: Uraniura Res. Eval. Proj. (IUREP) report for NEA/IAEA, 28 p.Google Scholar
  24. Sainsbury, C. L. and Reed, B. L., 1973, Tin,in United States mineral resources, Brobst, D. A. and Pratt, W. P. (eds.): U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 820 (p. 637–651), 722 p.Google Scholar
  25. Sekine, Y., 1963, On the concept of concentration of ore-forming elements and the relationship of their frequency in the earth's crust: Int. Geol. Rev., v. 5(5), p. 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skinner, B. J., 1976, A second Iron Age ahead: Am. Sci. v. 64(3), p. 258–269.Google Scholar
  27. Spoerri, A. E., 1976, mineral production of Canada by Province, 1931–1975: Min. Dev. Sector, Dept. Energy. Mines and Resources, Cttawa, 161 p.Google Scholar
  28. Thayer, T. P., 1973, Chromium,in United States mineral resources, Brobst, D. A. and Pratt, W. P. (eds.): U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 820 (p. 111–121) 722 p.Google Scholar
  29. Turekian, K. K. and Wedepohl, K. H., 1961. Distribution of the elements in some major units of the earth's crust: Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., v. 72(2), p. 175–192.Google Scholar
  30. Vokes, F. M., 1976, The abundance and availability of mineral resources,in World mineral supplies, assessment and prospective, Govett, G. J. S. and Govett M. H., (eds): Elsevier (p. 65–97), 472 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleum Publishing Corporation 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Garrett
    • 1
  1. 1.Geological Survey of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations