Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 377–387 | Cite as

Where have all the skeptics gone?: Patterns of new age beliefs and anti-scientific attitudes in preservice primary teachers

  • Gregory C. R. YatesEmail author
  • Margaret ChandlerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Is belief in the paranormal alive and well within preservice teachers? In this survey 232 undergraduates (including 202 preservice primary teachers) were asked to react to a series of eight statements reflecting paranormal New Age beliefs rated earlier by a faculty panel as “totally unbelievable.” Overall, the students' modal response was expressed as “no particular opinion,” although for five of the eight items the modal respónse was “slightly believable.” It was found that only four students within the sample consistently rejected all eight statements. The frequency of ‘believers’ outnumbered the ‘skeptics’ in relation to three items (beliefs in UFOs, psychic seances, and Nostradamus). New Age factor scores were not significantly related to undergraduate faculty or year level, to holding anti-scientific beliefs or to a measure of TV-viewing, and did not correlate significantly with the personality scale Need for Cognition. Females evidenced higher New Age scores than males, but attitudes to science were unrelated to gender.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Realist Science Filler Item Cognition Scale Poker Machine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alcock, J. E., & Otis, L. P. (1980). Critical thinking and belief in the paranormal.Psychological Reports, 46, 479–482.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.),Educator's handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, G., & Gilovich, T. (1999).Why smart people make big money mistakes and how to correct them: Lessons from the new science of behavioural economics. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
  4. Blackmore, S., & Troscianko, T. (1985). Belief in the paranormal: Probability judgements, illusory control, and the chance baseline shift.British Journal of Psychology, 76, 459–468.Google Scholar
  5. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donahue, M. J. (1993). Prevalence and correlates of new age beliefs in six protestant denominations.Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, H. (1995).A skeptic's guide to the new age. Sydney, NSW: Australian Skeptics.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination.American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallup Organization. (1999). Releases 9 July: Most Americans support prayer in public schools.<http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr990709.asp>Accessed October 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Gilovich, T. (1991).How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reasoning in everyday life, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking.Educational Researcher, 28, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Longbottom, J. E., & Butler, P. H. (1999). Why teach science?: Setting rational goals for science education.Science Education, 83, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lord, T. R., & Rauscher, C. (1991). A sampling of basic life literacy in a college population.American Biology Teacher, 53, 419–424.Google Scholar
  14. Messer, W. S., & Griggs, R. A. (1989). Student belief and involvement in the paranormal and performance in introductory psychology.Teaching of Psychology, 16(4), 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Monk, M., & Osbourne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy.Science Education, 81, 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, M. G. (1992). Enhancing science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reynolds, A. J. (1991). Note on adolescents' time use and scientific literacy.Psychological Reports, 68, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roberts, M. J., & Seager, P. B. (1999). Predicting belief in paranormal phenomena: A comparison of conditional and probabilistic reasoning.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sagan, C. (1996).The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. London: Randon House.Google Scholar
  20. Schick, T., & Vaughn, L. (1995).How to think about weird things: Critical thinking for a new age. London: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  21. Schoon, K. J. (1995). The origin and extent of alternative conceptions in the earth and space sciences: A survey of preservice elementary teachers.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7, 27–46.Google Scholar
  22. Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers.Science Education, 82, 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharmann, L. C., & Orth Hampton, C. M. (1995). Cooperative learning and preservice elementary elementary teacher science self-efficacy.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 125–133.Google Scholar
  24. Shestowsky, D., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1998). Need for cognition and interpersonal influence: Individual differences in impact on dyadic decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1317–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, S. M., & Levin, I. P. (1996). Need for cognition and choice framing effects.Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 9, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In H. Reece (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 133–180), San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stevens, C., & Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers' knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics.School Science and Mathematics, 96, 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wertheim, M. (2000). Science, magic and the kitchen sink.Weekend Australian, January 1–2 (p. 27).Google Scholar
  29. Wierzbicki, M. (1985). Reasoning errors and belief in the paranormal.Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Science Education Research Association 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Psychology, University of South AustraliaMagill

Personalised recommendations