Advertisement

Critical Criminology

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 5–19 | Cite as

Resistance and compliance in women’s prisons: Towards a critique of legitimacy

  • Mary Bosworth
Essays

Abstract

This article explores how power is negotiated in women’s prisons. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in three penal establishments in England, the author analyses the ways by which women negotiate restrictions of imprisonment and the manner in which they attempt to resist institutional control. It is proposed that power is negotiated on a private, internalised level, as women often resist the institution simply by trying to maintain an image of control over their own lives. However, this image of themselves as active, reasoning agents is undermined by institutional constraints that encourage them to exhibit traditional, passive, feminine behaviour at the same time as they deny them their identities and responsibilities as mothers, wives, girlfriends, and sisters. The author concludes that women’s modes of resistance indicate that imprisonment is contested and embattled in ways reflecting broader, social norms of behaviour and identity, and thus, that the ‘legitimacy’ of imprisonment rests, at least in part, upon gender.

Keywords

Feminist Theory Critical Criminology Female Prisoner Male Prisoner Maximum Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Advisory Council on the Penal System, 1968.The Regime for Prisoners in Conditions of Maximum Security (Radzinowicz Report). London, HMSOGoogle Scholar
  2. Beetham, D. 1991,The Legitimation of Power. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhabib, S. 1992.Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosworth, M., and A. Liebling. 1995.Incentives in Prison Regimes: A Review of the Literature. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  5. Bottoms, A., and R. Light, eds.Problems of Long-Term Imprisonment. Aldershot: GowerGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidouti, R. 1994.Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. — 1991.Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Cain, M. 1986. ‘Realism, Feminism, Methodology, and Law.’International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 14 (3/4): 255–267Google Scholar
  9. Carlen, P. 1985.Criminal Women: Autobiographical Accounts. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  10. — 1983.Women’s Imprisonment: A Study in Social Control, London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavadino, M., and J. Dignan. 1992.The Penal System: An Introduction. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  12. Clear, T. 1988. ‘Statistical Prediction in Corrections.’Research in Corrections, 1 (1): 1–39Google Scholar
  13. Clear, Todd, Bruce Stout, Harry Dammer, Linda Kelly, Patricia Hardyman, and Carol Shapiro. 1992. ‘Does Involvement in Religion Help Prisoners Adjust to Prison?’NCCD Focus, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  14. Clemmer, D. 1940.The Prison Community. New York: Holt, Rinchart and WilsonGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, S., and I. Taylor. 1972.Psychological Survival: Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
  16. Eaton, M. 1993.Women After Prison, Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Faith, K. 1993.Unruly Women: The Politics of Confinement and Resistance. Vancouver: Press Gang PublishersGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald, M. 1977.Prisoners in Revolt. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleisher, M. 1989.Warehousing Violence. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. 1979.Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraser, N. 1989.Unruly Practices: Power: Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelsthorpe, L. 1992. ‘Response to Martyn Hammersley’s Paper “On Feminist Methodology.”’Sociology, 26 (2): 213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gelsthorpe, L. and A. Morris, eds. 1990.Feminist Perspectives in Criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Giallombardo, R. 1966.Society of Women: A Study of a Women’s Prison. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
  25. Giddens, A. 1984.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilligan, C. 1982/1993.In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. 1969.The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Allen LaneGoogle Scholar
  28. — 1961.Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. London: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  29. Griffiths, M. 1995.Feminisms and the Self: The Web of Identity. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Habermas, J. 1976.Legitimation Crisis. London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  31. Hammersley, M. 1992. ‘On Feminist Methodology.’Sociology, 26 (2): 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hannah-Moffat, K. 1995. ‘Feminine Fortresses: Women-Centered Prisons?’The Prison Journal, Special Issue: Women in Prisons and Jails, 75 (2): 135–164Google Scholar
  33. Harding, S., ed. 1987.Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Milton Keynes. Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Heffernan, E. 1974.Making it in Prison: The Square, the Cool, and the Life. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  35. Hekman, S. 1995.Moral Voices, Moral Selves: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Henry, S., and D. Milovanovic. 1996.Constitutive Criminology: Beyond Postmodernism. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Hobbest, T. 1960.Leviathan. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  38. Home Office, 1984.Managing the Long-Term Prison System: The Report of the Control Review Committee. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  39. —. 1966.Report of the Inquiry into Prison Escapes and Security. (Mountbatten Report). London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  40. Howe, A. 1994.Punishand Critique: Towards a Feminist Analysis of Penality. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Larrabee, M. J., ed. 1993,An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Learmont, J. 1995.Review of Prison Service Security in England and Wales and the Escape from Parkhurst Prison on Tuesday 3rd January 1995 London: HMSO, Cm 3020.Google Scholar
  43. Liebling, A. 1992.Suicides in Prison. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Locke, J. 1967.Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Mathiesen, T. 1965.The Defences of the Weak: A Sociological Study of a Norwegian Correctional Institution, London: Tavistock PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  46. Merry, S. 1995. ‘Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law.’Law and Society Review, 29 (1): 11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. — 1990.Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Morris, A., and C. Wilkinson. 1995. ‘Responding to Female Prisoners’ Needs.’The Prison Journal, 75 (3): 295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Padel, U., and P. Stevenson. 1988.Insiders: Women’s Experiences of Prison. London: Virago PressGoogle Scholar
  50. Player, E. 1994. ‘Women’s Prisons After Woolf,’ in E. Player and M. Jenkins, eds.,Prisons After Woolf: Reform Through Riot, 203–225, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramazanoglu, C. 1992. ‘On Feminist Methodology: Male Reason Versus Female Empowerment.’Sociology, 26 (2): 207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rawls, J. 1971.A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Reinharz, S. 1992.Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  54. Richie, B. 1996.Compelled to Crime: The Gender Entrapment of Battered Black Women. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Rock, P. 1996.Reconstructing a Women’s Prison: The Holloway Redevelopment Project, 1968–88. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  56. Rousseau, J. J. 1993.The Social Contract and Discourses. London: Orion Publishing GroupGoogle Scholar
  57. Scott, J. 1985.Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Sim, J. 1994. ‘Reforming the Penal Wasteland? A Critical Review of the Woolf Report,” in E. Player and M. Jenkins, eds.,Prisons After Woolf: Reform Through Riot, 31–45, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Sparks, R. 1994. ‘Can Prisons be Legitimate? Penal Politics, Privatization, and the Timeliness of an Old Idea,’British Journal of Criminology, 34: 14–28Google Scholar
  60. Sparks, R., and A. Bottoms. 1995. ‘Legitimacy and Order in Prisons.’The British Journal of Sociology, 46 (1): 45–62Google Scholar
  61. Sparks, R., A. Bottoms, and W. Hay. 1996.Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Stanley, L. and S. Wise. 1993.Breaking Out Again. Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Sykes, G. 1958.The Society of Captives: A Study of Maximum Security Prisons. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  64. Taylor, C. 1989.Sources of the Self The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  65. — 1985.Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Toch, H., K. Adams, and J.D. Grant. 1989.Coping: Maladaptation in Prisons. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
  67. Vagg, J. 1994.Prison Systems: A Comparative Study of Accountability in England, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  68. Weber, M. 1968.Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, Volume I, II. Berkley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  69. White, L. 1991. ‘Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G,’ In M.A. Fineman and N.S. Thomadsen, eds.,At the Boundaries of Law: Feminism and Legal Theory, 40–58. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Ward, D., and G. Kassebaum. 1965.Women’s Prison: Sex and Social Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  71. Woodcock, J. 1994.Report of the Enquiry into the Escape of Six Prisoners from the Special Security Unit at Whitemoor Prison. London: HMSO, Cm 2741Google Scholar
  72. Woolf, Lord Justice. 1991.Prison Disturbances, April 1990. London: HMSO, Cmnd. 1456.Google Scholar
  73. Zedner, L. 1991.Women, Crime and Custody in Victorian England. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Division on Critical Criminology 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Bosworth
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations