Scientometrics

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 481–492 | Cite as

On the possibility and reliability of predictions based on stochastic citation processes

  • W. Glänzel
Article

Abstract

A statistical model for citation processes, a particular version of a non-homogeneous birth process, is analysed in the context of predictions of future citation rates. Important properties of the process were already studied by the author in earlier papers. Although the applicability of the model was demonstrated by several examples, practical aspects of predictions and questions of statistical reliability were not tackled so far. The present study is focused on the demonstration of the possibility of true predictions and on the analysis of the statistical reliability of predictions based on the mean value functionE(X(t)−X(s)/X(s)=i) of citation processes. The citation rates for papers published in 1980 and 1991 were recorded in the period 1980 through 1995, and 1991 through 1995, respectively, in all science areas. It is shown that parameters of mean value functions estimated for earlier time periods can be applied to more recent years, too. As a by-product, the model may serve as a validation tool for the particular choice of citation windows in evaluation studies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Maczelka, H., Schubert, A. (1994), World science in the eighties. National performances in publication output and citation impact, 1985–1989 versus 1980–1984. Part I. All science fields combined, physics, and chemistry, Part II. Life sciences, engineering and mathematics,Scientometrics, 29, pp. 299–334, 31, pp. 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Grupp, H. (1995), The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part I. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and physics, Part II. Life sciences,Scientometrics, 33, pp. 263–293, 34, pp. 207–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burrell, Q. L. (1988), Predictive aspects of some bibliometric processes. In:L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics 87/88, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
  4. Burrell, Q. L. (1990), Empirical prediction of library circulations based on negative binomial processes. In:L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics 89/90, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  5. Burrell, Q. L., Fenton M. R. (1994), A model for library book circulations incorporating loan periods,JASSIS, pp. 101–116.Google Scholar
  6. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1995), Predictive aspects of a stochastic model for citation processes,Information Processing & Management, 31, pp. 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1994), A stochastic model the ageing analyses of scientific literature,Scientometrics, 30, pp. 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1995), A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature in the social sciences.Journal of Information Sciences, 21, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
  9. Grupp, H., Hinze, S. (1994), International orientation, efficiency of and regard for research in East and West Germany: A bibliometric investigation of aspects of technology genesis in the United Germany,Scientometrics, 29, pp. 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Glänzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Association for Science Communication and Information e.V. (RASCI)Frankfurt (Oder)(Germany)

Personalised recommendations