Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 163–169 | Cite as

Relations of relative scientometric impact indicators. The relative publication strategy index

  • P. Vinkler
Short Communication

Abstract

Relations of three relative scientometric indicators (Relative Citation Rate, RCR, Relative Subfield Citedness, RW, and Relative Publication Strategy, RPS) are studied. RW can be calculated by the percentage share of citations divided by that of publications. The findings indicate that publishing in journals with relatively high impact factor is a necessary but not sufficient condition for attaining a high RW index.

Keywords

Impact Factor Percentage Share High Impact Factor International Impact Absolute Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Vinkler, Literature overlap measures for information pools of research teams, In:Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,M. E. D. Koenig,A Bookstein (Eds), Learned Information, Medford, 1995, p. 617.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. L. Raisig, Mathematical evaluation of the scientific serial,Science, 131 (1960) 1417.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Garfield,Citation Indexing. Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities, Wiley, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Vinkler, Scientometric methods in the evaluation of research groups, In:Evaluating Science and Scientists,M. S. Franken,J. Cave (Eds), Central European University Press, Budapest, 1997, p. 149.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Braun, W. Glänzel, H. Grupp, The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part I. and II.Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 263; 34 (1995) 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Vinkler, Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Vinkler, Bibliometric analysis of publication activity of a scientific research institute, In:Informetrics, 89/90,L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (1990) 309.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Vinkler, Bibliometric features of some scientific subfields and the scientometric consequences therefrom.Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Vinkler, Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators,Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ye-Sho Chen, F. F. Leimkuhler, Bradford's low: An index approach,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ye-Sho Chen, P. P. Chang, M. Y. Tong, Dynamic behavior of Bradford's low,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (1995) 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Vinkler
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Research Institute for ChemistryHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapest(Hungary)

Personalised recommendations