Advertisement

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 465–491 | Cite as

Explosive route to chaos through a fractal torus in a generalized Lotka-Volterra model

  • Nikola Samardzija
  • Larry D. Greller
Article

Abstract

The behavior of a model that generalizes the Lotka-Volterra problem into three dimensions is presented. The results show the analytic derivation of stability diagrams that describe the system's qualitative features. In particular, we show that for a certain value of the bifurcation parameter the system instantly jumps out of a steady state solution into a chaotic solution that portrays a fractal torus in the three-dimensional phase space. This scenario, is referred to as the explosive route to chaos and is attributed to the non-transversal saddle connection type bifurcation. The stability diagrams also present a region in which the Hopf type bifurcation leads to periodic and chaotic solutions. In addition, the bifurcation diagrams reveal a qualitative similarity to the data obtained in the Texas and Bordeaux experiments on the Belousov-Zhabotinskii chemical reaction. The paper is concluded by showing that the model can be useful for representing dynamics associated with biological and chemical phenomena.

Keywords

Steady State Solution Chaotic Attractor Strange Attractor Interarrival Time Stability Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Abraham, R. H. and C. D. Shaw. 1985.Dynamics—The Geometry of Behavior, Part 3. Aerial Press, Inc., P. O. Box 1360, Sanata Cruz, California 95061.Google Scholar
  2. Argoul, F., A. Arnéodo, P. Richetti and J. C. Roux. 1987 “From Quasiperiodicity to Chaos in the Belousov-Zhabotinskii Reaction I. Experiment.”,J. Chem. Phys. 86 (6), 3325.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnéodo, A., P. Coullet and C. Tresser. 1980. “Occurrence of Strange Attractors in Three-dimensional Volterra Equation.”Phys. Lett. 79A, 259–263.Google Scholar
  4. Arnéodo, A., P. Coullet, J. Peyraud and C. Tresser. 1982. “Strange Attractors in Volterra Equations for Species in Competition”.J. math. Biol. 14, 153–157.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold, V. I. 1984.Catastrophe Theory. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, H. T. 1962.Introduction to Nonlinear Differential and Integral Equations. Dover.Google Scholar
  7. Devaney, R. L. 1987. “Chaotic Bursts in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems”.Science 235, 342.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Feinberg, M. 1980. “Chemical Oscillations, Multiple Equilibria, and Reaction Networks.” InDynamics and Modeling of Reactive Systems. Ray, Stewart and Conley (Eds), Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gardini, L., C. Mammana and M. G. Messia. 1986. “Bifurcations in Three-Dimensional Lotka-Volterra Competitive Models”.Adv. Modelling and Simulation 5 (3), 7–14.Google Scholar
  10. Gear, C. W. 1971.Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Gilpin, M. E. 1979. “Spiral Chaos in a Predator-Prey Model”,Amer. Naturalist 113, 301–306.Google Scholar
  12. Gleick, J. 1987.CHAOS—Making a New Science. Viking Penguin, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Guckenheimer, J. and P. Holmes. 1983.Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Hale, J. K.Topics in Dynamic Bifurcation Theory. American Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, No. 47.Google Scholar
  15. IMSL Library Fortran Subroutines, IMSL Inc., Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
  16. Lorenz, E. N. 1963. “Deterministic Non-Periodic Flows”.J. atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lotka, A.J. 1920. “Undamped Oscillations Derived from the Law of Mass Action”.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 42, 1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. May, R. W., and W. J. Leonard. 1975. “Nonlinear Aspects of Competition between Three Species”.SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29(2), 243–253.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicolis, G. and I. Prigogine. 1977.Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems—From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations. John Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Richetti, P., J. C. Roux, F. Argoul and A. Arnéodo. 1987. “From Quasiperiodicity to Chaos in the Belousov-Zhabotinskii Reaction II—Modeling and Theory”.J. chem. Phys. 86 (6), 3339.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rössler, O. E. 1976. “Chaotic Behavior in Simple Reaction System”.Z Naturforschung 31a, 259–264.Google Scholar
  22. Samardzija, N. 1983. “Stability Properties of Autonomous Homogeneous Polynomial Differential Systems”.J. Diff. Equations 48 (1), 60–70.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schaffer, W. M. 1985. “Order and Chaos in Ecological Systems”.Ecology 66 (1), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaw, C. D.The Dripping Faucet as a Model Chaotic System. Aerial Press, Inc. P.O. Box 1360, Santa Cruz, California 95061.Google Scholar
  25. Smale, S. 1966. “Structurally Stable Systems are not Dense”.Amer. J. Math. 88, 491–496.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smale, S. 1976. “On the Differential Equations of Species in Competition”.J. math. Biol. 3, 5–7.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sparrow, C. 1982.The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Turner, J.S., J. C. Roux, W. D. McCormick and H. L. Swinney. 1981. “Alternating Periodic and Chaotic Regimes in a Chemical Reaction—Experiment and Theory”.Phys. Lett. 85A, 9–12.Google Scholar
  29. Tyson, J. J., and J. C. Light. 1973. “Properties of Two-component Bimolecular and Trimolecular Chemical Reaction System.J. chem. Phys. 59 (8), 4164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Volterra, V. 1931. “Leçons sur la Théorie Mathématiques de la Lutte pour la Vie.” Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikola Samardzija
    • 1
  • Larry D. Greller
    • 1
  1. 1.Engineering Department, and Central Research & Development DepartmentE. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.WilmingtonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations