, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 427–439 | Cite as

An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis

  • W. Glänzel
  • A. Schubert
  • H. -J. Czerwon


A serious shortcoming of bibliometric studies based on the(Social) Science (s) Citation Index is the lack of an universally applicable subject classification scheme as individual papers are concerned. Subject classification of papers on the basis of assigning journals to subject categories (like those found in the various supplements of ISI databases) works well in case of highly specialised journals, but fails for multidisciplinary journals such asNature, Science andPNAS—and so far as subfields are taken into consideration-also for “general” journals (e.g.JACS orAngewandte Chemie). This study presents the results of a pilot project attempting to overcome this shortcoming by delimiting the subject of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals by an item-by-item subject classification scheme, where assignment is based on the analysis of the subject classification of reference literature. The results clearly confirmed the conclusions of earlier studies by the authors in the field of reference analysis. For the really important journals (sufficiently high number of annual publications and high impact with respect to the field), the share of classifiable papers was surprisingly high, and the assignment proved reliable as well. Since papers in the leading general and multidisciplinary journals are frequently citing general and multidisciplinary journals, an iterated application of the procedure is expected to increase the number of classifiable publications.

The results of the new methodology may improve the validity of bibliometric studies for research evaluation purposes.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. Narin, Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Computer Horizons, Inc., Washington, D.C., 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Todorov, W. Glänzel, Computer bibliometrics for journal classification,Information Processing and Management, 26 (5) (1990) 673–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. R. Braam, H. F. Moed, A. F. J. Van Raan, Mapping of science by combined co-citation and coword analysis I.,JASIS, 42 (4) (1991) 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Small, Update of science mapping: Creating large document spaces,Scientometrics, 38 (2) (1997) 275–293.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Small, A general framework for creating large-scale maps of science in two or three dimensions: The SciViz system,Scientometrics, 41 (1–2) (1998) 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. E. de Bruin, H. F. Moed, Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications,Scientometrics, 26 (1) (1993) 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Glänzel, H. J. Czerwon, A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level,Scientometrics, 37 (2) (1996) 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin, A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences,Information Processing and Management, 35 (1999) 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, Scientometric Datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major fields and subfields 1981–1985.Scientometrics, 16 (5–6) (1989) 3–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Glänzel
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Schubert
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. -J. Czerwon
    • 2
  1. 1.Bibliometrics Service, Library of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Research Association for Science Communication and Information e. V. (RASCI)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations