Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 41, Issue 1–2, pp 225–241 | Cite as

The signs of science

  • P. Wouters
Article

Abstract

Since theScience Citation Index emerged within the system of scientific communication in 1964, an intense controversy about its character has been raging: in what sense can citation analysis be trusted? This debate can be characterized as the confrontation of different perspectives on science. In this paper the citation representation of science is discussed: the way the citation creates a new reality of as well as in the world of science; the main features of this reality; and some implications for science and science policy.

Keywords

Scientific Literature Science Citation Index Science Policy Citation Analysis Citation Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson, S. (1975), The footnotes of science,Mosaic, 6(2), 22–27.Google Scholar
  2. Amsterdamska, O., Leydesdorff, L. (1989), Citations: Indicators of significance?Scientometrics, 15, 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankersmit, F. R. (1990),De navel van de geschiedenis. Over interpretatie, representatie en historische realiteit, Historische uitgeverij Groningen.Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore, M. (1989),The Reflexive Thesis. Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bloor, D. (1976).Knowledge and Social Imagery, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chubin, D. E., Moitra, S. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting,Social Studies of Science, 5, 423–441.Google Scholar
  7. Chubin, D., Hackett, E. J. (1990).Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy, State University of New York Press, Albany, US.Google Scholar
  8. Cozzens, S. (1981). Taking the measure of science: A review of citation theories,International Society for the Sociology of Knowledge Newsletter, 7, (1–2) 16–20.Google Scholar
  9. Cozzens, S. (1985), Comparing the sciences: Citation context analysis of papers from neuropharmacology and the sociology of science,Social Studies of Science, 15, 127–153.Google Scholar
  10. Cronin, B. (1989). What do citations count? the rhetoric-first model,Scientometrics, 15, 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cronin, B. (1981), The need for a theory of citing,Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 16–24.Google Scholar
  12. Cronin, B. (1984),The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, Taylor Graham, London.Google Scholar
  13. de Wilde, R. (1992).Discipline en legende. De identiteit van de sociologie in Duitsland en de Verenigde Staten 1870–1930, Van Gennep, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  14. Edge, D. (1979), Quantitative measures of science: A critical review,History of Science, 17, 102–134.Google Scholar
  15. Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (1990),Introduction to Informetrics Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Garfield, E., Malin, M., Small, H. (1979).Citation Data as Science Indicators, John Wiley & Sons, New York, chapter 8, pp. 179–207.Google Scholar
  17. Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science,Nature, 227, 669–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garfield, E. (1979).Citation Indexing, ISI, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. (1979),Central Problems in Social Theory, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  20. Gilbert, N. G., Woolgar, S. (1974). The quantitative study of science An examination of the literature,Science Studies, 4(3), 279–294.Google Scholar
  21. Hacking, I. (1983).Representing and Intervening Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Hagendijk, R. (1996),Wetenschap, Constructivisme en Cultuur, Rob Hagendijk.Google Scholar
  23. Huizinga, J. (1937),De wetenschap der geschiedenis, Tjeenk Willink, Haarlem.Google Scholar
  24. Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1986),Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Latour, B. (1987).Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Latour, B. (1988), The politics of explanation: an alternative, In:Citeasnoun {woolgar-reflex}, chapter 8, pp. 155–177.Google Scholar
  27. Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Towards a theory of citation,Scientometrics, 12, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorenz, C. (1987, 1994),De constructive van het verleden. Een inleiding in de theorie van de geschiedenis, Boom.Google Scholar
  29. Luhmann, N. (1992),Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.Google Scholar
  30. Luukkonen, T. (1990),Citations in the Rhetorical, Reward and Communications Systems of Science PhD thesis, Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, ser A, vol. 285, University of Tampere, Tampere.Google Scholar
  31. Luukkonen, T. (1997), Why has latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community?Discussion of Sociological Interpretations of Citation Analysis, Vol. 38, pp. 27–39.Google Scholar
  32. Lynch, M., Woolgar, S. (1990),Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, B. R. (1984), The negational reference: or the art of dissembling,Social Studies of Science, 14, 91–94.Google Scholar
  34. MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J. (1988),The Tree of Knowledge, New Science Libary, Boston.Google Scholar
  36. Merton, R. K. (1977), The sociology of science: An episodic memoir, In:R. K. Merton, J. Gaston (Eds),The Sociology of Science in Europe, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, chapter 1, pp. 3–141.Google Scholar
  37. Narin, F. (1976),Evaluative Bibliometrics, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, N.J.Google Scholar
  38. Price, D. de S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers,Scientometrics, 149, 510–515.Google Scholar
  39. Price, D. de S. (1970).Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology and Non-Science, D. C. Health & Co., Lexington, Mass., pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  40. Romein, J. (1976a),Historische lijnen en patronen. Een keuze uit de essays Querido, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  41. Romein, J. (1976b), Theoretische geschiedenis, pp. 245–271.Google Scholar
  42. Romein, J. (1976c), Zekerheid en onzekerheid in de geschiedwetenschap, pp. 90–119.Google Scholar
  43. Small, H. G., Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literature. i: Identifying and graphing specialties,Science Studies, 4, 17–40.Google Scholar
  44. Small, H., Sweeney, E. (1985), Clustering theScience Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science,Scientometrics, 8, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, L. C. (1981), Citation analysis,Library Trends, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
  46. Tollebeek, J. (1996),De ekster en de kooi, Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
  47. Woolgar, S. (1988a),Knowledge and Reflexivity New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  48. Woolgar, S. (1988b)Science: The Very Idea, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  49. Woolgar, S. (1991), Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy,Science and Public Policy, 18, 319–326.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Wouters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science and Technology Dynamics Nieuwe Achtergracht 166Amsterdam(The Netherlands)

Personalised recommendations