Human Evolution

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 35–41

Morphological distance between australopithecine, human and ape skulls

  • M. Verhaegen
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

This paper attempts to quantify the morphological difference between fossil and living species of hominoids. The comparison is based upon a balanced list of craniodental characters corrected for size (Wood & Chamberlain, 1986). The conclusions are: craniodentally the australopithecine species are a unique and rather uniform group, much nearer to the great apes than to humans; overall, their skull and dentition do not resemble the human more than the chimpanzee’s do.

Key Words

human evolution hominids apes skull Australopithecus Homo erectus chimpanzee gorilla 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bown T.M., Holroyd P.A. and Rose K.D., 1994. Mammal extinctions, body size, and paleotemperature.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 91: 10403–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Du Brul, E.L., 1977. Early hominid feeding mechanisms.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 47: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edelstein S.J., 1987. An alternative paradigm for hominoid evolution.Human Evolution, 2: 169–174.Google Scholar
  4. Ferguson W.W., 1989. A new species of the genusAustralopithecus Primates-Hominidae from the Plio/ Pleistocene deposits West of Lake Turkana in Kenya.Primates, 30: 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibbs, H.L. and Grant P.R., 1987. Oscillating selection on Darwin’s finches.Nature, 327: 511–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodman M., 1982. Biomolecular evidence on human origins from the standpoint of Darwinian theory.Human Biology, 54: 247–264.Google Scholar
  7. Gribbin J. and Cherfas J., 1983.The Monkey Puzzle. London: Triad.Google Scholar
  8. Hasegawa M., Kishino H. and Yano T., 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2: 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horai S., Hayasaka K., Kondo R., Tsugane K. and Takahata N., 1995. Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequences of hominoid mitochondrial DNAs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92: 532–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleindienst M.R., 1975. On new perspectives on ape and human evolution.Current Anthropology, 16: 644–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oxnard C.E., 1984.The Order of Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Puech P.-F., 1992. Microwear studies of early African hominid teeth.Scanning Microscopy, 6: 1083–1088.Google Scholar
  13. Seger J., 1987. El Niño and Darwin’s finches.Nature, 327: 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Silson R.G., 1988.Additive Genes in Evolution and Selection. Tring: Greenfield PubblicationsGoogle Scholar
  15. Verhaegen M., 1990. African ape ancestry.Human Evolution, 5: 295–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Verhaegen M., 1992. Did robust australopithecines partly feed on hard parts of Gramineae?Human Evolution, 7: 63–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verhaegen M., 1993. Aquaticversus savanna: comparative and paleo-environmental evidence.Nutrition and Health, 9: 165–191.Google Scholar
  18. Verhaegen M., 1994. Australopithecines: ancestors of the African apes?Human Evolution, 9: 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. White T.D. and Harris J.M., 1977. Suid evolution and correlation of African hominid localities.Science, 198: 13–21.Google Scholar
  20. Wood B.A. and Chamberlain A.T., 1986.Australopithecus: grade or clade? In (B.A. Wood, L. Martin and P. Andrews, eds).Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, pp. 220–248, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Verhaegen
    • 1
  1. 1.PutteBelgium

Personalised recommendations