Morphological distance between australopithecine, human and ape skulls
- 16 Downloads
This paper attempts to quantify the morphological difference between fossil and living species of hominoids. The comparison is based upon a balanced list of craniodental characters corrected for size (Wood & Chamberlain, 1986). The conclusions are: craniodentally the australopithecine species are a unique and rather uniform group, much nearer to the great apes than to humans; overall, their skull and dentition do not resemble the human more than the chimpanzee’s do.
Key Wordshuman evolution hominids apes skull Australopithecus Homo erectus chimpanzee gorilla
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Edelstein S.J., 1987. An alternative paradigm for hominoid evolution.Human Evolution, 2: 169–174.Google Scholar
- Goodman M., 1982. Biomolecular evidence on human origins from the standpoint of Darwinian theory.Human Biology, 54: 247–264.Google Scholar
- Gribbin J. and Cherfas J., 1983.The Monkey Puzzle. London: Triad.Google Scholar
- Oxnard C.E., 1984.The Order of Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Puech P.-F., 1992. Microwear studies of early African hominid teeth.Scanning Microscopy, 6: 1083–1088.Google Scholar
- Silson R.G., 1988.Additive Genes in Evolution and Selection. Tring: Greenfield PubblicationsGoogle Scholar
- Verhaegen M., 1993. Aquaticversus savanna: comparative and paleo-environmental evidence.Nutrition and Health, 9: 165–191.Google Scholar
- White T.D. and Harris J.M., 1977. Suid evolution and correlation of African hominid localities.Science, 198: 13–21.Google Scholar
- Wood B.A. and Chamberlain A.T., 1986.Australopithecus: grade or clade? In (B.A. Wood, L. Martin and P. Andrews, eds).Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, pp. 220–248, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar