Advertisement

Philosophia

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 331–350 | Cite as

Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb's paradox

  • William Lane Craig
Article

Conclusion

Newcomb's Paradox thus serves as an illustrative vindication of the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. A proper understanding of the counterfactual conditionals involved enables us to see that the pastness of God's knowledge serves neither to make God's beliefs counterfactually closed nor to rob us of genuine freedom. It is evident that our decisions determine God's past beliefs about those decisions and do so without invoking an objectionable backward causation. It is also clear that in the context of foreknowledge, backtracking counterfactuals are entirely appropriate and that no alteration of the past occurs. With the justification of the one box strategy, the death of theological fatalism seems ensured. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A0985044 00003

Keywords

True Proposition Special Resolution Close World Counterfactual Dependence Standard Resolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Philosophia 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Lane Craig
    • 1
  1. 1.Westmont CollegeSanta barbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations