The generative power of feature geometry

  • András Kornai
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a formalization of the common structure underlying different proposals concerning the geometry of phonological features. Using the concepts and tools of elementary set theory, lattice theory, and the theory of independent Boolean algebras, ametatheory of autosegmental feature structure is developed. This metatheory enables us to compare contemporary autosegmental phonology to the now abandoned “standard” phonology and to the historically important Pānini-type phonology as well, and to investigate the restrictions on the use of features in phonological theory.

References

  1. [1]
    D. Archangeli, Yokuts harmony: evidence for coplanar representation in nonlinear phonology, Linguistic Inquiry 16(1985)335–372.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Archangeli and D. Pulleyblank,The Content and Structure of Phonological Representations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L.R. Bahl, P.V. de Souza, P.S. Gopalakrishnan, D. Nahamoo and M.A. Picheny, Decision trees for phonological rules in continuous speech, in:ICASSP-91, Toronto (1991) pp. 185–188.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Cardona, On Pānini's morphophonemic principles. Language 41(1965)225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Cherry, Roman Jakobson's distinctive features as the normal coordinates of a language, in:For Roman Jakobson, ed. M. Halle (Mouton, The Hague, 1956).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Cherry,On Human Communication (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1957).MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Cherry, M. Halle and R. Jakobson, Toward a logical description of languages in their phonemic aspect, Language 29(1953)34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    N. Chomsky,Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    N. Chomsky and M. Halle,The Sound Pattern of English (Harper & Row, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G.N. Clements, The geometry of phonological features, Phonology Yearbook 2(1985)225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G.N. Clements, Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops, in:CLS Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, Vol. 23, ed. A. Bosch, B. Need and E. Schiller (1987) pp. 29–50.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Ehrenfeucht, private communication.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    V.A. Fromkin and R. Rodrnan,An Introduction to Language (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J.A. Goldsmith,Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 1990).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Grammont, La dissimilation consonatique dans les languages indo-européennes et dans les langauges romanes, Dijon (1895).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Halle, On the bases of phonology, in:The Structure of Language, ed. J.A. Fodor and J. Katz (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964) pp. 324–333.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Halle and P. Ladefoged, Some major features of the International Phonetic Alphabet, Language 64(1988)577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    B. Hayes, Inalterability in CV phonology, Language 62(1986)321–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. van der Hulst, The geometry of vocalic features, Leiden Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics (1988).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Itô, A. Mester, E. Selkirk and H. van der Hulst, Properties of feature organization, Reading materials for NSF-sponsored Workshop BNS-9021357, LSA Linguistic Institute, UC Santa Cruz (1991).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    O. Jespersen,Lehrbuch der Phonetik (Teubner, Leipzig, 1904).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    W. Leben, Suprasegmental phonology, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA (1973).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    J.J. McCarthy, Feature geometry and dependency: a review, Phonetica 45(1988)84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    E.C. Sagey, The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (1986).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    W. Sandler, Sequentiality and simultaneity in American Sign Language phonology, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin (1987).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    B. Schein and D. Steriade, On geminates, Linguistic Inquiry 17(1986)691–744.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    J.F. Staal, A method of linguistic description: the order of consonants according to Pānini, Language 38(1962)1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    K.N. Stevens and S.E. Blumstein, The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features, in:Perspectives on the Study of Speech, ed. P. Eimas and J. Miller (Lawrence Erlebaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • András Kornai
    • 1
  1. 1.CSLIStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations