The influence of heavy metals upon the growth of sitka-spruce in South Wales forests
Experiments on sitka-spruce seedlings grown in acidic peaty gley soils under green-house conditions, where the soils where doped with increasing amounts of Cd, Cu and Pb up to maximum levels of metal added of 16 ppm, 32 ppm and 400 ppm respectively, showed that the levels of Cd and Pb in shoots and roots increased with increasing levels in the soil, whereas levels of copper appeared to be independent. The addition of these three metals to the soils did not influence the uptake of other heavy metals, or of the nutrients potassium or calcium. Increases in the shoot cadmium levels significantly reduced the yields of the plant shoots. However, the plant yields were only affected by the highest level of lead that was added to the soil (400 ppm Pb) and unaffected by all the copper treatments (0–32 ppm Cu in the soil).
The lengths of the sitka-spruce roots were reduced when cadmium and lead levels in the soil exceeded certain threshold concentrations (2.5 ppm total Cd, where 0.3 ppm was extractable with 0.5 M acetic acid; and 48 ppm total Pb, where 1.7 ppm was extractable). However, root lengths were not reduced by copper. This was probably related to the fact that copper appears to be relatively unavailable in the type of soil used, as only 1.1. ppm Cu was extractable from a total of 32 ppm Cu added. Root branching was apparently reduced by increases in the soil levels of cadmium, copper and lead. The roots of some control plants had symbiotic mycorrhizal associations (4 out of 19 plants), whereas the roots of all the plants grown in the soils with added heavy metals did not develop these.
Key wordsHeavy metals Mycorrhizae Peaty Soils Sitka-spruce Tree growth
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Allen S E 1974 Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell Scientific., Oxford, 565 p.Google Scholar
- 2.Banwart W L, Tabatabai M A and Bremner J M 1972 Determination of ammonium in soil extracts and water samples by an ammonium electrode. Comm. Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 3, 449–458.Google Scholar
- 10.Cottenie A, Verloo M, Kiekens L, Camerlynck R, Velghe G and Dhease A. 1979 Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in the System Soil- Water- Plant. Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry. State University Ghent. Belgium, 75 p.Google Scholar
- 11.Davis R D and Carlton-Smith C 1980 Crops as indicators of the significance of contamination of soil by heavy metals. Water Research Centre Technical Report TR 140, 42 p.Google Scholar
- 12.Eckshlager K 1961 Errors, Measurements and Results in Chemical Analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold. London, 85 p.Google Scholar
- 13.Finney D J 1947 Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
- 14.Fisher R A and Yates F 1948 Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, Oliver and Boyd., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- 18.James H, Court M N, Macleod D A and Parsons J W 1978 Relationships between growth of sitka spruce, soil factors and mycorrhizal activity on basaltic soils in Western Scotland. Forestry 51, 105–119.Google Scholar
- 19.Jones G E 1970 An investigation into the possible causes of poor growth of sitka-spruce, Margam Forest, Glamorgan. Research Papers in Forest Meteorology. Symposium No. 13, 147–156.Google Scholar
- 21.Pyatt D G, Craven M M and Williams B L 1979 Peatland classification for forestry in Great Britain. Proc. Int. Symp. on Classification of Peat and Peatlands. Int. Peat Soc. 351–366.Google Scholar
- 22.Ruhling A and Tyler G 1973 Heavy metal pollution and decomposition of spruce needle litter. Oikos. 24, 402.Google Scholar
- 23.Siccama T G and Smith W H 1978 Lead accumulation around a northern hardwood forest. Am. Chem. Soc. 12, 593–594.Google Scholar
- 24.Smith G R 1975 Rapid determination of nitrate-nitrogen in soils and plants with the nitrate electrode. Anal. Letters. 8, 503–508.Google Scholar