International Journal of Anthropology

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 273–279 | Cite as

Geographical differentiation of cephalometric data of a nomadic isolated Hellenic population (Sarakatsani)

  • G. Panagiaris
  • S. Manolis
  • Con Zafeiratos


The scientific value of isolated human populations is important for the understanding of ethnic formation, or for micro-evolution. The population of Sarakatsani in HELLAS was nomadic up to 10–15 years ago. It may still be considered as nomadic since it migrates during winter and summer.

We studied three Sarakatsanic groups, geographically isolated in Epirus, Central Macedonia and Peloponessos.

Nine cephalometric variables were measured and subjected to Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The latter showed that 55% of the variables indicate a statistically significant difference. The former showed that only the Peloponesean population is well differentiated. The groups from Epirus and Macedonia differentiated between them less, compared to the Peloponesean group.

Key words

Cephalometric data isolated populations nomadism genetic drift geographical isolation socioeconomic status 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen J.A., 1977. The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species,Radical Review, 1: 108–140.Google Scholar
  2. Beals, K., 1972. Head form and climatic stress,Amer. J. of Phys. Anthropo. 37: 85–92. Bergmann, C. (1897): Uber Verhaltnisse der Warmeokonomie des Thietezu ihreh Grosse,Gottinger Studien, 3: 597–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard R., 1971.Anthropological Subjects (in Greek), Athens Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chatzimichali A., 1957.Sarakatsani, Athens.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell J.K., 1965.Honour, family and patronage. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crognier E., 1981a. Climate and anthropometric variations in Europe and the Mediterranean area.Annals of Human Biology, vol. 8, Nb. 2: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crognier E., 1981b. The influence of climate on the physical diversity of European and Mediterranean Populations.Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 10: 611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herskovitz E. et al., 1983. Migration and Biological Isolation of Human Population,Anthropos, vol. 10: 344–356.Google Scholar
  9. Hiernaux J., 1963. Heredity and environment: their influence on human morphology. A comparison of two independent lines of study. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropo. 21: 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoeg C., 1925.Les Sarakatsane, une tribu nomade Greque. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  11. Howells W.W., 1966. Population Distances: Biological, Linguistic, Geographical, and Environmental.Current Anthropology, vol. 7: 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howells W.W., 1969. The use of Multivariate techniques in the study of skeletal populations.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropo. 31: 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howells W.W., 1973. Cranial variation in Man.Papers of the Peabody Museum, vol. 67, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  14. Kavadias G., 1981.Pasteurs nomades Mediterranées, Atenes.Google Scholar
  15. McHenry E. and Giles E., 1971. Morphological variation and heritability in three Melanesean populations: a multivariate approach. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropo. 35: 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macheras, P. and Balafoutis Ch., 1984.Contribution to the study of Hellenic Bioclimatic Zones. Thessaloniki (in Greek)Google Scholar
  17. Tsoumanis Chr., 1981.Sarakatsani. 2nd Bull. of Zagoria Research Center.Google Scholar
  18. Zafeiratos C. and Panagiaris G., 1983. Sarakatsani: A Hellenic nomad population.Proceedings of Sarakatsani Congress: 1–25, Serres (in Greek).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Panagiaris
    • 1
  • S. Manolis
    • 1
  • Con Zafeiratos
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Biology, Laboratory of Biological AnthropologyUniversity of AthensAthensHellas

Personalised recommendations