International Journal of Anthropology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 113–125 | Cite as

Growth attainments of well-off chandigarh children: A mixed longitudinal study

  • Bhalla A. K. 
Article

Abstract

Distance and velocity pattern of growth for body weight and height of 134 well-off Chandigarh boys aged 9–17 years, and 109 girls aged 9 to 16 years were studied following a mixedlongitudinal growth study design. For both body weight and height pattern-wise, Chandigarh boys showed close similarity with their American counterparts up to about 13 years of age, while girls did so till 12 years. Where after, Chandigarh children remained lighter and shorter than those of American origin and this differential may be explained on racial grounds rather than nutritional ones since all children included in this study remained free from dietary and other health related constraints. Marginally, higher height growth attainments noticed in Chandigarh children in contrast to their other Indian counterparts during initial years of adolescence shows that Chandigarh children are in process of expressing their genetic growth potential to its full which has not yet been fully achieved.

The rate (velocity) of weight and height growth in Chandigarh children remained substatially lower than their sex-matched British counterparts throught the period of study. PHV in boys measured 6.4 cm/yr. and 5.4 cm/yr. in girls. It was attained at the age of 11.5 years in girls and 12.5 years in boys. Peak weight velocity in boys averaged 3.7 kg/yr., while it measured 4.6 kg/yr. in girls. In girls (11.5 yr.), PWV too was attained earlier than boys (13.5 yr.) by two years. The shorter height and lighter weight growth attainments noticed in Chandigarh children in contrast to their Western counterparts may be attributed to slower and lesser magnitude peak growth velocities recorded in Chandigarh children. The use of values presented has been recommended to monitor and assess growth attainments of Indian children residing in the Union Territory of Chandigarh.

Keywords

Mixed-longitudinal data Growth velocity Weight Height Well-off children 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal D.K., Agarwal K.N., Upadhyay S.K., Mittal R., Prakash R., Rai S., 1992. Physical and sexual growth pattern of affluent Indian children from 5 to 18 years of age. Indian Pediatr, 29:1203–1282.Google Scholar
  2. Bielicki, T., 1976. On the relationship between maturation rate and maximum velocity of growth during adolescence. Studies Phys. Anthropol., Polish Acad. Sci., 1:51–64.Google Scholar
  3. Billewicz W.Z., Fellowes H.M., Thomson A.M., 1981. Pubertal changes in boys and girls of New castle-upon-Tyne. Ann. Hum. Biol., 8: 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billewicz W.Z., Thomson A.M., Fellowes H.M., 1983. A longitudinal study of growth in Newcastleupon Tyne adolescents. Ann. Hum. Biol., 10:125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckler J.: 1990. A longitudinal study of adolescent growth. Springer-verlaly, London, pp. 1–433.Google Scholar
  6. Committee of International Union of Nutritional Sciences, 1971. The creation of growth standard: a committee report of meeting in Tunis. Am. J. Clin Nutr. 25:218–220.Google Scholar
  7. Eveleth PB, Tanner JM, Worldwide variation in human growth, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1990, p 1–397.Google Scholar
  8. Gopaldas T, Capoor T., 1981. A nutritional status study on privileged adolescent Gujrati boys. Indian J. Med. Res., 73:188–198.Google Scholar
  9. ICMR., 1972. Growth and Physical development of Indian infants and children. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, Technical Report Series No. 18, pp. 1–176.Google Scholar
  10. Karlberg P, Taranger J, Engstrom I, Karlberg J, Landstrom T, Lichtenstein H, Lundstrom B, Svennberg-Redegren I., 1976. The somatic development of children in a swedish urban community. I Physical growth from birth to 16 years and longitudinal outcome of the study during the same period. Acta. Paediatr. Scand. (Suppl), (258): 7–76.Google Scholar
  11. Largo, R.H., Gasser, T.h. Prader A., Stuetzle, W., Huber, P.J., 1978. Analysis of adolescent growth spurt using smoothing spline functions. Ann. Hum. Biol., 5:421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindgren G. Hieght, 1976. Weight and menarche in Swedish urban school children in relation to socioeconomic and regional factors. Ann. Hum. Biol., 3:501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindgren, G. 1978., Growth of school children with early, average and late age of peak height velocity. Ann. Hum. Biol., 5: 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ljung B.O., Fischbein S., Lindgren G. 1977., A comparison of growth in twins and single-ton controls of matched age followed longitudinally from 10 to 18 years. Ann. Hum. Biol., 4:405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marshall W.A., Tanner J.M. 1969., Variation in patterns of pubertal Changes in girls. Arch. Dis. Child., 44:291.Google Scholar
  16. Marshall W.A., Tanner J.M. 1970., Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch. Dis. Child., 45:13.Google Scholar
  17. Marshall W.A, Tanner J.M., 1986. Puberty in Falkner eds. Human Growth — a comprehensive treatise, Vol 2, pp 171–209, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  18. NCHS., 1977. NCHS growth curves for children birth—18 years. Vital and Health Statistics. DHEV Publication No. (PN 6) 78-1650. National Centre for Health Statistics, Hytsville Md, Series, 11, 1–64.Google Scholar
  19. N.F.I. 1989., Growth of affluent Indian girls during adolescence. Scientific Report Nutrition Foundation of India, No. 10, pp 1–74, New Delhi,Google Scholar
  20. Raghavan K., Singh D., Swaminathan M.C., 1971. Heights and weights of well-nourished Indian children. Indian J. Med. Res., 59:648.Google Scholar
  21. Rao H.D., Sastry G.J., 1977. Growth-pattern of well-to-do Indian adolescents and young adults. Indian J. Med. Res., 66:950–956.Google Scholar
  22. Rath B., Gosh S., Mohan M. Ramanajucharyulu T.K.T.S., 1978. Anthropometric indices of a privileged community. Indian Pediatr., 15:653.Google Scholar
  23. Tanner J.M., 1951. Some notes on the reporting of growth data. Hum. Biol., 23:93–159.Google Scholar
  24. Tanner J.M., White house R.H., 1976. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity and stages of puberty. Arch. Dis. Child., 51: 170–179.Google Scholar
  25. Tanner J.M., White house R.H. Marubini E., Resele F., 1976. The adolescent growth spurt and girls of the Harpenden Growth Study. Ann. Hum. Biol., 3:109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanner J.M., White house R.H., Takaishi M., 1966. Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity and weight velocity: British Children, 1965. Arch. Dis. Child., 41: 454, 613–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taranger J., Lichtenstein H., Svenberg-Redegren I., 1976. The somatic development of children in a swedish urban community: VI. Somatic Pubertal development, Acta. Paediatr. Scand., (Suppl) 258:121–135.Google Scholar
  28. Tripathi A.M, Aggarwal D.K, Sen S, Agarwal, K.N., 1976. Physical growth during adolescence in Delhi school children. Indian Pediatr., 13:1991–1999.Google Scholar
  29. Zacharias L, Rand W.M., 1983. Adolescent grwoth in height and its relation to menarche in contemporary American girls, Ann. Hum. Biol., 10:209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhalla A. K. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Pediatric CenterPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations