Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 181–189 | Cite as

Habitat fragmentation and parasitism of a forest damselfly

  • Philip D. Taylor
  • Gray Merriam
Article

Abstract

We compared populations of a forest damselfly —Calopteryx maculata — in two kinds of landscapes. In fragmented landscapes, forested foraging patches were separated from streams (where oviposition and mating occur) by up to 500 m of pasture. In non-fragmented landscapes, there was continuous forest cover adjacent to streams. The prevalence and intensity of midgut infections of a gregarine parasite were significantly lower in the fragmented landscapes than in the non-fragmented landscapes. We have shown elsewhere that in the fragmented landscapes, damselflies move over greater areas to forage than in the non-fragmented landscapes. We postulate that these movements lower the rate of encounter between damselflies and oocysts, thus lowering the prevalence and intensity of infection. The differences suggest that actual habitat fragmentation events would alter the relationship between host and parasite, but that populations of both species would persist after fragmentation. Prevalence of parasitism is related to age but we found no residual effects of size on parasitism.

Keywords

Odonata Calopteryx maculata gregarine heterogeneity landscape structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Åbro, A. 1974. The gregarine infection in different species of Odonata from the same habitat. Zool. Scripta 3: 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åbro, A. 1976. The mode of gregarine infection in Zygoptera (Odonata). Zool. Scripta 5: 265–275.Google Scholar
  3. Åbro, A. 1987. Gregarine infection of Zygoptera in diverse habitats. Odonatologica 16: 119–128.Google Scholar
  4. Addicott, J.F., Aho, J.M., Antolin, M.F., Padilla, D.K., Richardson, J.S. and Soluk, D.A. 1987. Ecological neighbourhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.Google Scholar
  5. Anholt, B.R. 1992. Sex and habitat differences in feeding by an adult damselfly. Oikos 65: 428–432.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, J.M. and Hastie, T. 1989. Statistical models in S. Wadsworth & Brooks, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Corbet, P.S. 1980. Biology of Odonata. Ann. Rev. Ent. 25: 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunning, J.B., Danielson, B.J. and Pulliam, H.R. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169–175.Google Scholar
  9. Forbes, M.A. 1991. Ectoparasites and mating success of maleEnallagma ebrium damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Oikos 60: 336–342.Google Scholar
  10. Forbes, M.A. and Baker, R.L. 1991. Condition and fecundity of the damselfly,Enallagma ebrium (Hagen): the importance of ectoparasites. Oecologia 86: 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forsyth, A. and Montgomerie, R.D. 1987. Alternative reproductive tactics in the territorial damselflyCalopteryx maculata: sneaking by older males. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 21: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ives, A.R., Kareiva, P. and Perry, R. 1993. Response of a predator to variation in prey density at three hierarchical scales: Lady beetles feeding on aphids. Ecology 74: 1929–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, C. 1962. Breeding behaviour and oviposition inCalopteryx maculatum (Beauvois) (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Am. Mid. Nat. 68: 242–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, C. 1973. Ovarian development and age recognition in the damselfly,Argia moesta (Hagen 1961) (Zygoptera:Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 2: 69–81.Google Scholar
  15. Kareiva, P. 1987. Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predatory-prey interactions. Nature 326: 388–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotlier, N.B. and Wiens, J. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260.Google Scholar
  17. Kruess, A. and Tscharntke, T. 1994. Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control. Science 264: 1581–1584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lord, J.M. and Norton, D.A. 1990. Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation. Cons. Bio. 4: 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marden, J.H. and Waage, J.K. 1990. Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim. Behav. 39: 954–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCullagh, P. and Nelder J.A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  21. Merriam, H.G. 1984. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern.In Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning — Theme 1. pp. 5–15. Edited by J. Brandt and P. Agger. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Roskilde University, Roskilde.Google Scholar
  22. Roland, J. 1993. Large-scale forest fragmentation increases the duration of tent caterpillar outbreak. Oecologia 93: 25–30.Google Scholar
  23. Roland, J. and Taylor, P.D. 1995. Herbivore-natural enemy interactions in fragmented and continuous forests.In Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis. pp. 195–208. Edited by N. Cappuccino and P.W. Price. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Siegel, J.P., Novak, R.J. and Maddox, J.V. 1992. Effects ofAscogregarina barretti (Eugregarinida: Lecudinidae). infection onAedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Illinois. J. Med. Ent. 29: 968–973.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. and Merriam, G. 1993. Connectivity is a fundamental element of landscape structure. Oikos 68: 571–573.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, P.D., and Merriam, G. 1995. Wing morphology of a forest damselfly is related to landscape structure. Oikos 73: 43–48.Google Scholar
  27. Waage, J.K. 1972. Longevity and mobility of adultCalopteryx maculata (Beauvois, 1805) (Zygoptera:Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 1: 155–162.Google Scholar
  28. Wegner, J.F. and Merriam, G. 1990. Use of spatial elements in a farmlands mosaic by a woodland rodent. Biol. Conserv. 54: 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. Evanston, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Zuk, M. 1987a. Seasonal and individual variation in gregarine parasite levels in the field cricketsGryllus veletis andG. pennsylvanicus. Ecol. Ent. 12: 341–348.Google Scholar
  31. Zuk, M. 1987b. The effects of gregarine parasites on longevity, weight loss, fecundity and developmental time in the field cricketsGryllus veletis andG. pennsylvanicus. Ecol. Ent. 12: 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SPB Academic Publishing bv 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ottawa-Carleton Institute of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations