Advertisement

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp HTA20–HTA24 | Cite as

Work organisation, work environment and the use of medical equipment: A survey study of the impact on quality and safety

  • J. Persson
  • K. Ekberg
  • M. Lindén
Special Feature: Healthcare Technology Assessment

Abstract

In a study of hospital staff's perceived quality of care and worry, related to the use of medical equipment, a systems approach was used. This included training and user aspects on the equipment, environmental ergonomics, work organisation and psychosocial work conditions. In a survey study, 543 hospital staff members from seven departments with various degrees of equipment utilisation participated. By means of factor analysis, factors which were important to perceived quality of care and worry were determined. Adaptation of equipment and environment and training on the use of equipment were shown to be important. However, several organisational and psychosocial factors turned out to have a still greater impact. In the assessment of healthcare technologies which include medical equipment a holistic systems approach is therefore advocated.

Keywords

Human factors Medical equipment Quality assessment Safety Work environment Work organisation 

References

  1. Bernotat, R. andRau, G. (1991) Man-machine-interaction.Rev. Europ. Technol. Biomed.,13, 36–39.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, J., Newbower, R. S., Long, C. D. andMcPeek, B. (1978) Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors.Anesthesiol.,49, 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craig, J. andWilson, M. E. (1981) A survey of anaesthetic misadventures.Anaesthesia,36, 933–936.Google Scholar
  4. Donabedian, A. (1966) Evaluating the quality of medical care.Milbank Q.,44, 166–203.Google Scholar
  5. Fitter, M. (1987) The impact of new technology on workers and patients in the health services: physical and psychological stress. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  6. Hyman, W. A. andSchlain, L. A. (1986) User problems and medical device recalls.Med. Instrum.,20, 14–16.Google Scholar
  7. Karasek, R. andTheorell, T. (1990)Healthy work. Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Leppänen, R. A. andOlkinuora, M. A. (1987) Psychological stress experienced by health care personnel.Scand. J. Work Environ. Health,13, 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Lord, F. M. andNovick, M. R. (1968)Statistical theory of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  10. Miettinen, O. S. (1985)Theoretical epidemiology. Principles of occurrence research in medicine. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  11. OTA (1978) Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  12. Reason, J. (1990)Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Reiser, S. J. (1978)Medicine and the reign of technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Reiser, S. J. (1986) Assessment and the technologic present.Int. J. Technol. Assess. in Health Care,2, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, B., andTravers, P. (1991) Occupational hazards of critical care nursing. Overview of work-related hazards in nursing: health and safety issues.Heart & Lung,20, 486–497.Google Scholar
  16. Salvendy, G. (Ed.) (1987)Handbook of human factors. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Walter, C. andRichards, E. P. III (1991) How effective safety devices lead to secondary litigation.IEEE Eng. in Med. & Biol. Mag.,10, 66–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Persson
    • 1
  • K. Ekberg
    • 2
  • M. Lindén
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Medical Technology AssessmentLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Occupational HealthUniversity HospitalLinköpingSweden
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical EngineeringLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations