Advertisement

Archiv für Dermatologie und Syphilis

, Volume 73, Issue 2–3, pp 343–362 | Cite as

Über Lichen spinulosus

  • Felix Lewandowsky
Original-Abhandlungen

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Abraham. dermatol. soc. of London. July 1894. Brit. Journ. of Dermatol. Vol. VI. 1894. p. 249.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Audry. Keratosis circumpilaris. Monatsh. f prakt. Dermatol. Bd. XXXVIII. 1904. p. 529.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baudouin und Du Castel. Kératose folliculaire villeuse. Annales 1901. p. 422. cf. auch Barbe, Keratose folliculaire. Ibid. Kératose folliculaire villeuse. Annales 1901. p. 535.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennet. A case of Lichen spinulosus (Devergie). Australasian medical Gazette. Dez. 1902. p. 615. Ref. Annales 1903.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brocq. Les lichens. La pratique dermatologique. Band III. pag. 140. Paris 1902.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooke. Keratosis follicularis contagiosa. Internationaler Atlas seltener Hautkrankheiten. Nr. XXII.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crocker. Diseases of the Skin. Vol. I. pag. 405. 3. Auflage. London 1903.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    — derm. soc. of London. April 1902. Brit. Journ. of Dermat. Vol. XIV. 1902, p. 132.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    — Acne keratosa. Brit. Journ. of Derm. Vol. LXI. 1899. p. 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colcott Fox. Derm. soc. of London. February, April 1895. Brit. Journ. of Derm. Vol. VII. 1895. p. 90 u. 152.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacquet. Note inédite. S. bei Gauja und bei Veyrières.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galloway. Dermat. soc. of London. July 1899. Brit. Journ. of Derm. 1899. p. 315.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ganja. De la kératose pilaire. Thèse de paris 1894.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giovannini. Zur Histologie der Keratosis pilaris. Archiv f. Dermat. u. Syph. 1902. Bd. LXIII. Heft 2.Google Scholar
  15. 14a.
    — Reperto istologie in un caso di acne cornea. Gaz. medica di Torino. 1899. Vol. XLI. Ref. Annales 1901. p. 1105.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Halberstädter. Über eine eigenartige Form von Keratosis follicularis. (Lichen pilaris spinulosis?) Arch. f. Dermatol. u. Syph. 1903. Bd. LXVII. Heft 1. pag. 133.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Mac Leod. Derm. soc. of London. May 1904. Brit. Journ. of Dermat. 1904. Vol. XVI. p. 6.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    Mackey. Dermat. soc. of London. July 1896. Brit. Journ. of Dermatol. 1896. Vol. VIII. p. 326.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    Mibelli. Die Ätiologie und die Varietäten der Keratosen. Monatsh. f. prakt. Derm. 1897. Bd. XXIV.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Perry. Derm. soc. of London. February 1896. Brit. Journ. of Derm. 1896. Vol. VIII p. 98.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Pringle. Dermat. soc. of London. Juni 1897. Brit. Journ. of Derm. Bd. IX. 1897. p. 74.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    — Dermat. soc. of London. February, may 1902. Brit. Journ. of Derm. 1902. Vol. XIV. pag. 96 u. 168.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    Stowers. Dermat. soc. of London. Febr. 1899. Brit. Journ. of Derm. 1899. Vol. XI. p. 168.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Tenneson et Leredde. Acné kératique. Ann. 1895. p. 285.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Thibierge. Acné cornée. La pratique dermatologique. Band I. pag. 253.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Unna. Histopathologie der Hautkrankheiten. p. 288 u. 293.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Veyrières. Kératose pilaire. La pratique dermatologique. Bd. II. p. 952. Paris 1901.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wilhelm Braumüller 1905

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Lewandowsky
    • 1
  1. 1.dermatologischen Universitätsklinik in BernBernSchweiz

Personalised recommendations