International Journal of Anthropology

, Volume 10, Issue 2–3, pp 65–88

Has anthropology any future?

  • C. Susanne


Anthropology has a future and a very pertinent role to play, if we are sensitive to and aware of the new developments in the fields of medicine, biology and ecology which are undergoing dramatic changes. Most definitely these fields will need an anthropological dimension to be added.

The natural history and diversity of Man remains the basis of anthropology, but it is time to reassess the training available to students today, in order to keep the discipline alive, growing and significant. Undoubtedly we must offer our students a broad, general basis of knowledge in the first years. Thereafter we must include biomedical disciplines such as anatomy, molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and other pertinent subjects, such as statistics, ecology, prehistory, etc.

With these “tools” the future student would be well equipped to introduce anthropological aspects into many fields. As European universities cannot provide all these disciplines at a single institution at a level equivalent to PhD studies, we must work towards a tradition of exchange, co-operation and joint projects and universally acknowledged academic degrees such as a Masters and Ph.D. The Erasmus Biology Programme has already achieved some results in this respect and is ready with a proposal of a European Masters Degree in anthropology.

The “tools” of modern science together with the more traditional training will enrich the discipline, but more importantly enable the anthropologist to address controversial and often frightening prospects left in the wake of for example gene technology and gene manipulation, in a competent and scientific manner.

Many societies have allowed anthropologists to study their populations in detail. We, on the other hand, have an obligation to ensure that the data we have acquired and accumulated are not misused by those who practise racist, eugenic or nationalistic ideals.

The ability to carry out these obligations lies to a great extent in a strong, dynamic and diverse organisation, such as an EAA which is open to renewal and willing to address future social and political issues. A fragmented EAA cannot cope with these. There must be room for all in our organisation, ranging from the traditional to the very specialised anthropologist.

If we achieve the necessary unity, we will be able to participate in the challenges that the technology of the 20th and 21st centuries imposes on the daily lives of all of us.

To err is characteristic of everyone but only idiots persevere in it (Cicero).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberts S.C. and C. Ober, 1993.Genetic variability in the major histocompatibility complex: a review of non-pathogen-mediated selective mechanisms. Yearb. Phys. Anthr., 36: 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews P., 1992.Evolution and environment in the Homoidea. Nature, 360, 641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arsuaga J.L. and J.M. Carretero, 1994.Multivariate analysis of the sexual dimorphism of the hip bone in a modern human population and in early hominids. Am. J. Phys. Anthr., 93: 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey R.C., Jenike M.R., Ellison P.T., Bentley G.R., Harrigan A.M. and N.R. Peacock, 1992.The ecology of birth seasonality among agriculturalists in central Africa. J. Biosoc. Sci., 24.Google Scholar
  5. Baumann G., 1988.Heterogeneity of growth hormone. In Basic and clinical aspects of growth hormone. Ed. by B.B. Bercu. Plenum Press, p. 13–31.Google Scholar
  6. Berge C., 1993.L'évolution de la hanche et du pelvis des hominidés. Bipédie, parturition, croissance, allométrie. Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie, 110p.Google Scholar
  7. Blurton Jones N., 1987.Bushman birth spacing: direct tests of some simple predictions. Ethol. Sociobiol., 8: 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brugal J.P., 1992.Eco-ethologie des premiers Hominidés en Afrique: les activités de subsistance. Bull. Mém. Soc. Anthr. Paris, 4: 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler G.E., McKie, M. and S.G. Ratcliffe, 1989.An analysis of the phases of mid-childhood growth by synchronisation of growth spurts. In Auxology 88, Perspectives in the Science of Growth and Development, ed. J.M. Tanner, pp 77–84. Smith-Gordon, London.Google Scholar
  10. Cole T., 1993.Seasonal effects on physical growth and development. In Seasonality and Human Ecology, ed. Ulijaszek S.J. and S.S. Strickland, pp89–106, Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman D., 1994.Trends in fertility and intermarriage among immigrant populations in Western Europe as measures of integration. J. Biosoc. Sci., 26: 107–136.Google Scholar
  12. Demes B., and N. Creel, 1988.Bite force, diet and cranial morphology of fossil hominids. J. Hum. Evol., 17: 657–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devor E.J., 1992.Molecular applications in biological anthropology. Cambridge Univ. Press 258p.Google Scholar
  14. Dunbar R.I., 1990.Environmental and social determinants of fecundity in Primates. In Fertility and resources. Ed by J. Landers and V. Reynolds. Symposium 31 of the Society for the study of human biology: 5–17.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrlich P.R. and A.H. Ehrlich, 1990.The population explosion. Simon and Schuster, New York 320p.Google Scholar
  16. Flint J., Clegg J.B. and AJ. Boyce, 1992.Molecular genetics of globin genes and human population structure. In Devor E.J., Molecular applications in biological anthropology. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp 103–178.Google Scholar
  17. Foley R., 1987.Another unique species. Patterns in human evolutionary ecology Longman, New York, 313p.Google Scholar
  18. Foley R., 1989.The evolution of hominid social behaviour. In Comparative socioecology. The behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals. Ed by S. Standen and R.A. Foley Blackwell Scient. Publ., Oxford, pp 473–494.Google Scholar
  19. Friday A.E., 1992.Human evolution: the evidence from DNA sequencing. In The Cambridge encyclopedia of human evolution. Ed by S. Jones, R. Martin and D. Pilbeam Cambridge Univ. Press: 316–321.Google Scholar
  20. Galera V., M.D. Garralda and J.M. Moreno, 1994.La poblacion Cantabria de Santa Maria de Mito. Perspectivas paleodemograficas de la edad media en Espana. Bol. Soc. Espanola Antropologica (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Garralda M.D., 1994.Evolutionary aspects of pregnancy and birth. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  22. Goodman M., Bailey W.J., Hayasaka K., Stanhope M.J., Slightom J. and J. Czelusniak, 1994.Molecular evidence on primate phylogeny from DNA sequences. Am. J. Phys. Anthr., 94: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartman M.L., A. Iranmanesh, M.O. Thorner and J.D. Veldhuis 1993.Evaluation of pulsatile patterns of growth hormone release in Humans: a brief review. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 5, 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hermanussen M., 1993.Rhythms of growth. Acta Med. Auxologica, 25: 75–79.Google Scholar
  25. Hermanussen M. and J. Burmeister. 1993.Children do not grow continuously but in spurts. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 5, 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hermanussen M., K. Geiger-Benoit, J. Burmeister and W.G. Sippell, 1988.Periodical changes of short term growth velocity (“mini growth spurts”) in human growth. Ann. Hum. Biol., 15, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill K., 1993.Life history theory and evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary anthropology, Wiley-Liss, New York pp 78–88.Google Scholar
  28. Himes J.H., 1991.Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status. Wiley-Liss, New York 431p.Google Scholar
  29. Jacquard A., 1993.Préparer demain. In Vers un ailleurs prometteur. L'émigration, une réponse universelle à une situation de crise? Cahiers de l'institut universitaire d'études du développement. Genève: 361–395.Google Scholar
  30. Johnston C.C., 1992.Calcium supplementation and increases in bone mineral density in children. New England J. Med., 327: 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kattmann, U., 1992.Anmerkungen zur Wissenschaftssystematik und Wissenschaftsethik der Anthropologie auf dem Hintergrund ihrer Geschichte. Wissenschaft. In Spannungsfeld zwischen Missbrauch und Verantwortung. Ed. H. Preuschoft and U. Kattmann, Un. Oldenburg: 127–142.Google Scholar
  32. Kelley, J., 1992.Evolution of apes. In The Cambridge encyclopedia of human evolution. Ed by S. Jones, R. Martin and D. Pilbeam Cambridge Univ. Press: 223–230.Google Scholar
  33. Kluckhohn C. and A.L. Kroeger, 1972.Culture. A critical review of concepts and definitions. Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
  34. Lalueza C., Pérez-Pérez A., and D. Turbon, 1993.Microscopic study of the Banyoles mandible (Girona, Spain): diet, cultural activity and toothpick use. J. Hum. Evol., 24: 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lampl M. 1993.Evidence of saltatory growth in infancy. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 5, 641–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lampl M., Veldhuis J.D., and M.L. Johnson, 1992.Saltation and stasis: a model of human growth. Nature, 258: 801–803.Google Scholar
  37. Low, B.S., 1993.Ecological demography: a synthetic focus in evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology, Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 177–187.Google Scholar
  38. Macchiarelli R., and L. Bondioli, 1994.Linear densitometry and digital image processing of proximal femur radiographs: implications fro archaeological and forensic anthropology. Am. J. Phys. Anthr. 93: 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marks J., 1994.Blood will tell (won't it?): a century of molecular discourse in anthropological systematics. Am. J. Phys. Anthr. 94: 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matkovic V., 1992.Calcium and peak bone mass. J. Internal Med. 231: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Melnick D.J., Hoelzer G.A., and R.L. Honeycutt, 1992.Mitochondrial DNA: its uses in anthropological research. In Devor E.J. ed Molecular applications in biological anthropology. Cambridge Univ. Press: 176–233.Google Scholar
  42. Missa J.N., 1993.L'esprit-cerveau. La philosophie de l'esprit à la lumière des neurosciences. Librairie J. Vrin, Paris 266p.Google Scholar
  43. Morin E., 1990.Penser l'Europe. Gallimard, Paris: 266p.Google Scholar
  44. Ortiz B.R. de Montellano, 1993.Melanin, afrocentricity and pseudoscience. Yearb. Phys. Anthr. 36: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pagézy H., 1992.Chasse et pêche dans l'alimentation des Ntomba du Zaïre. Bull. Mém. Soc. Anthr. Paris, 4: 175–190.Google Scholar
  46. Perez-Perez A., C. Lalueza and D. Turbon, 1994.Intraindividual and intragroup variability of buccal tooth striation pattern. Am. J. Phys. Anthr., 94, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Phillips J., 1988.Genetic effects in processing growth hormone. In Basic and clinical aspects of growth hormone. Ed. by B.B. Bercu. Plenum Press, p.57–67.Google Scholar
  48. Piontek J., and M. Henneberg, 1981.Mortality changes in a polish rural community (1350–1972) and estimation of their evolutionary significance. Am. J. Phys. Anthr. 54: 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prado C., 1990.Report on the natural interruption of pregnancy related to menarche in the population of Madrid. Am. J. Hum. Biol.2: 691–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prado C., Canto M., and P. Gomez-Lobo, 1992.Social and biological risk factors related to the climacteric period in women: osteoporosis. Coll. Antrop. 16: 157–165.Google Scholar
  51. Preuschoft, H. 1972.Physical anthropology in German-speaking Europe. Yearb. phys. anthr., 16, 122–140.Google Scholar
  52. Preuschoft H. and U. Kattmann Ed., 1992.Wissenschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen Missbrauch und Verantwortung, Un. Oldenburg p. VI.Google Scholar
  53. Rayner R.J. and J.C. Masters, 1993.Sera el jardin del Eden un bosque? Mundo Cientifico, 142: 62–63.Google Scholar
  54. Rogers J., 1994.Levels of the genealogical hierarchy and the problem of hominoid phylogeny. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 94: 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosetta L., 1990.Biological aspects of fertility among third world populations. In Fertility and resources. Ed by J. Landers and V. Reynolds. Symposium 31 of the Society for the study of human biology, 18–34.Google Scholar
  56. Saunders S.R., and R.D. Hoppa, 1993.Growth deficit in survivors and non-survivors: biological mortality bias in subadult skeletal samples. Yearb. Phys. Anthr., 36: 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schell L.M., 1991.Effects of pollutants on human prenatal and postnatal growth: noise, lead, polychlorobiphenyl compounds, and toxic wastes. Yearb. Phys. Anthrop., 34: 157–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schurr Th.G., Ballinger S.W., Gan Y.Y., Hodge J.A., Merriwether D.A., Lawrence D.N., Knowler W.C., Weiss K.M. and D.C. Wallace, 1990.Amerindian mitochondrial DNA's have rare Asian mutations at high frequencies, suggesting they derived from four primary maternal lineages. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46: 613–623.Google Scholar
  59. Shapiro L.J., and W.L. Jungers, 1994.Electromyography of back muscles during quadrupedal and bipedal walking in Primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthr., 93: 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Slemenda Ch.W., Miller J.Z., Siu L. Hui, Reister T.K. and C.C. Johnston, 1991.Role of physical activity in the development of skeletal mass in children. J Bone and Min. Res. 6: 1227–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spiegel-Rösing I. and I. Schwidetzky, 1982.Maus und Schlange. Untersuchungen zur Lage der deutschen Anthropologie. R. Oldenbourg Verlag, München.Google Scholar
  62. Susanne, C., 1990.Les manipulations génétiques. Jusqu'où aller? De Boeck Univ., Bruxelles, 239pp.Google Scholar
  63. Tanner J.M., 1989.Foetus into Man, Castlemead Publ.Google Scholar
  64. Trevathan W.R., 1987.Human birth: an evolutionary perspective. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 268p.Google Scholar
  65. Ulijaszek S., 1994.Growth monitoring and growth cyclicities in developed countries In Anthropometry: the individual and the population ed. by Ulijaszek and Mascie-Taylor C.G.N. Cambridge Press p 99–107.Google Scholar
  66. Ulijaszek S., and C.G.N. Mascie-Taylor (EdS), 1994.Anthropometry: the individual and the population. Cambridge Press 213p.Google Scholar
  67. Vandermeersch, B. and M.D. Garralda, 1994.El origen del Hombre moderno en Europa. Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitehouse D., 1992.Principles of genetics. In The Cambridge encyclopedia of human evolution. Ed. by S. Jones, R. Martin and D. Pilbeam, Cambridge Univ. Press p. 255–263.Google Scholar
  69. Wienker C.W., and K.A. Bennett, 1992.Trends and developments in physical anthropology, 1990–91. Am. J. Phys. Anthr. 87: 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wood J.W., G. Milner, H.C. Harpending and K.M. Weiss, 1992.The osteological paradox. Problems of inferring prehistoric health from skeletal samples. Current Anthropology, 33: 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Susanne
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory AnthropogeneticsFree University of BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations