Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 565–568 | Cite as

Characteristic impedance of the proximal aorta determined in the time and frequency domain: a comparison

  • Jean-Pierre L. Dujardin
  • Dana N. Stone
Article

Abstract

Pressure and flow were measured in the ascending aorta of eight anaesthetised dogs under control conditions, after volume expansion and after haemorrhage. For each case the characteristic impedance of the proximal aorta Zc was determined by means of two different methods. Zc was calculated in the time domain as the slope of the pressure-flow relationship in early ejection. For each case, six different values were also obtained in the frequency domain by averaging the impedance moduli in six different frequency ranges. Time- and frequency-domain values agreed well. Statistical analysis showed that both methods can be used to study changes in Zc. However, the time-domain method is easier to apply and does not require steady-state conditions.

Keywords

Aortic impedance Characteristic impedance Time-domain method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, F. L. (1971) Fourier analysis of left ventricular performance.Circ. Res. 28, 119–135.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, T. N. S., Prys-Roberts, C., Biro, G., Föex, P. andBennett, M. J. (1978) Aortic input impedance and left ventricular energetics in acute isovolumic anaemia.Cardiovascular. Res. 12, 49–55.Google Scholar
  3. Cox, R. H. andBagshaw, R. J. (1975) Baroreceptor reflex control of arterial hemodynamics in the dog.Circ. Res. 37, 772–786.Google Scholar
  4. Dujardin, J. P., Stone, D. N., Paul, L T. andPieper, H. P. (1980) Response of systemic arterial input impedance to volume expansion and hemorrhage.Am. J. Physiol. 238, (Heart Circ. Physiol 7): H902-H908.Google Scholar
  5. Farrar, D. J., Malindzak, G. S. Jr. andJohnson, G. Jr. (1978) Dynamic pressure-flow diagrams and impedance in experimental arterial stenosis and in stenotic atherosclerosis.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 6, 413–428.Google Scholar
  6. Gessner, U. (1972) Vascular input impedance. InCardiovascular fluid dynamics vol II.Bergel, D. H. (Ed.) Academic Press, 315–349.Google Scholar
  7. Kenner, Th. (1979) Physical and mathematical modeling in cardiovascular systems. InQuantitative cardiovascular studies Hwang, N. H. C., Gross, D. R. andPatel, D. J. (Eds.), University Park Press: Baltimore, 41–109.Google Scholar
  8. O'Rourke, M. F. andTaylor, M. G. (1967) Input impedance of the systemic circulation.Circ. Res. 20, 365–380.Google Scholar
  9. Peluso, F., Topham, W. S. andNoordergraaf, A. (1978) Response of systemic input impedance to exercise and to graded aortic constriction. InCardiovascular system dynamics,Baan,J.,Noordergraaf,A. andRaines,J. (Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 432–440.Google Scholar
  10. Pepine, C. J., Nichols, W. W., Curry, R. C. Jr. andConti, C. R. (1979) Aortic input impedance during nitroprusside infusion.J. Clin. Invest. 64, 643–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pouleur, H., Covell, J. W. andRoss, J. Jr. (1979) Effects of alterations in aortic input impedance on the force-velocitylength relationship in the intact canine heart.Circ. Res.,45, 126–135.Google Scholar
  12. Westerhof, N., Elzinga, G. andVan den Bos, G. C. (1973) Influence of central and peripheral changes on the hydraulic input impedance of the systemic arterial tree.Med. & Biol. Eng.,11, 710–723.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Pierre L. Dujardin
    • 1
  • Dana N. Stone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations