International Journal of Anthropology

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 41–55 | Cite as

Activity-induced skeletal markers in historical anthropological material

  • Gy. Pálfi
  • O. Dutour
Article

Abstract

A new research way of palaeopathology has recently opened: it concerns the study of the impact of the human activities on the skeleton and the reconstitution of these activities. Being interested essentially in the activity-induced skeletal markers, we carried out this study on 354 human skeletal remains. The Hungarian series represents a larger sample (263 skeletons from the 10th century; collections of the Department of Anthropology, József Attila University, Szeged, Hungary). We considered also as comparison series a collection of 91 skeletons dating from the Late Antiquity (4th century A.D.) from Provence (France), stored in the collections of the Centre Archéologique du Var (Toulon, France). The present work is based on the results of a general palaeopathological analysis with a particular attention to the possible activity-linked microtraumatic lesions.

Articular and periarticular markers of activity were detected as secondary degenerative joint diseases and mechanical enthesopathies. In spite of the high rate of non-specific cases, the alterations reveal several possible activities, historically and archaeologically well documented as riding on horse-back in the Hungarian series. The sexual inegality in the distribution of the macrotraumatic lesions (male predominance of the fractures and sprains in the Hungarian series) reveals also some information about the activities of the ancient Hungarians.

Key words

Paleopathology skeletal markers of activity microtraumas Hungary France 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arlet J. &Mazières B. 1985.La maladie hyperostosique. Rev. Méd. Interne, 6: 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auvinet B. 1980.La hanche du cavalier. Méd. du Sport. 54: 281–285.Google Scholar
  3. Berger R.A. 1993.Overuse syndrome of the elbow. In: The elbow and its disorders (edited by B.F. Morrey). Philadelphia, Saunders, pp. 604–609.Google Scholar
  4. Blondiaux J. 1994.A propos de la dame d'Hochfelden et de la pratique cavalière: discussion autour des sites foncionnels fémoraux. In: La femme pendant le Moyen Åge et l'époque moderne. (edited by L. Buchet). Paris, CNRS Éditions, pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
  5. Bridges P.S. 1990.Osteological Correlates of Weapon Use. In: A Life in Science: Papers in Honor of J. Lawrence Angel (edited by J.E. Buikstra). Center for Am. Archeol. Sci. Paper 6: 87–98.Google Scholar
  6. Brun, J.-P., Congès, G., Gebara, Ch. &Pasqualini, M. 1985.L'habitat rural dans le Var à l'époque romaine: Données archéologiques récentes. Provence Historique, 35, 141: 233–251.Google Scholar
  7. Claustre J. 1987.Syndromes d'hypersollicitation para-articulaires du pied. In: Microtraumatologie du sport (edited by J. Rodineau & L. Simon). Paris, Masson, pp. 91–95.Google Scholar
  8. Clement D.B., Taunton J.E. &Smart G.W. 1984.Achilles tendinitis and peritendinitis: etiology and treatment. Am. J. Sports Med., 12: 179–184.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper C. 1995.Occupational activity and the risk of osteoarthritis. J. Rheumatol., (suppl. 43) 22: 10–12.Google Scholar
  10. Dastugue J. &Gervais V. 1992.Paléopathologie du squelette humain. Paris, Boubée.Google Scholar
  11. During E.M., Zimmerman M.R., Kricun M.E. &Rydberg J. 1994.Helmsman's Elbow: An Occupational Disease of the 17th Century. Journal of Palaeopathology, 6: 19–27.Google Scholar
  12. Dutour O. 1986.Enthesopathies (lesions of muscular insertions) as indicators of the activities of Neolithic Saharan populations. American J. Phys. Anthropol., 71: 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutour O. 1992.Activités physiques et squelette humain: le difficile passage de l'actuel au fossile. Bull. et Mém. de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 3–4: 233–241.Google Scholar
  14. Estryn-Behar M. 1991.Affections de l'appareil locomoteur en relation avec l'exercise d'une profession. Encycl. Méd-Chir., Toxicologie-Pathologie professionnelle, 16531 F10, Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Ferembach D., Schwidetzky, I. &Stoukal M. 1980.Recommendations for age and sex diagnoses of skeletons. Journal of Human Evolution, 9: 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferembach D., Suzanne Ch. &Chamla M.-C. 1986.L'homme, son évolution, sa diversité. Paris, CNRS Éditions, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar
  17. Fournié B. &Fournié A. 1992.Le territorie enthésique, l'enthésite et les spondylarthropathies inflammatoires. Rhumatologie, 44, 8: 169–173.Google Scholar
  18. Gebara Ch. &Pasoualini M. 1993.Sépultures et cimetières ruraux en Provence orientale à l'époque galloromaine. In: Monde des morts, monde des vivants en Gaule rurale. Actes du Congrès ARCHEA, Orléans; Tours: ARCHEA/AGER, pp. 341–366.Google Scholar
  19. Györffy Gy. 1984. Magyarország története. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  20. Hess G.P., Capiello W.L., Poole R.M. &Hunter S.C. 1989.Prevention and treatment of overuse tendon injuries. Sports Medicine, 8: 371–384.Google Scholar
  21. Iscan M.Y. 1989.Age Markers in the Human Skeleton. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  22. Józsa L., Pap I. & Fóthi E. Enthesopathies (insertion tendinopathies) as indicators of overuse of tendons and muscles in ancient Hungarian populations. Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung., 83: 269–276.Google Scholar
  23. Jurmain R.D. &Kilgore L. 1995.Skeletal evidence of osteoarthritis: a paleopathological perspective. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 54: 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennedy K.A.R. 1989.Skeletal Markers of Occupational Stress. In: Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton (edited by M.Y. Iscan & K.A.R. Kennedy). New York, Alan Liss, pp. 129–161.Google Scholar
  25. Kouvalchouk J.F. 1987. Hypersollicitation articulaire: remaniements osseux et ostéocartilagineux de la tibio-tarsienne In: Microtraumatologie du sport (edited by J. Rodineau & L. Simon). Paris, Masson, pp. 204–212.Google Scholar
  26. Kramer J. 1990.Intervertebral disk diseases. New York, Thieme Medical Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. La Cava G. 1959.Enthésite ou maladie des insertions.Press Médicale, 67, 9.Google Scholar
  28. Lagier R. 1991.Enthèses normales et enthésopathies. In: Pathologie des insertions et enthésopathies (edited by L. Simon, Ch. Hérisson & J. Rodineau). Paris, Masson.Google Scholar
  29. Lagier R. 1992.Anatomie des enthésopathies. Rhumatologie, 44, 8: 165–168.Google Scholar
  30. Lai P. &Lovell N.C. 1992.Skeletal markers of occupational stress in the Fur Trade: a case study from a Hudson'Bay Company fur trade post. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leatherman K.D. &Dickson R.A. 1988.The management of spinal deformities. London, Wright.Google Scholar
  32. Lott D.J., Jasani M.K. &Birdwood G.F.B. 1987.Studies in osteoarthrosis. Pathogenesis, Intervention, assessment. London, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Merbs C.F. 1983.Patterns of activity induced pathology in a Canadian innuit population. Ottawa, Archeol. Survey Canadian Papers, Mercury Ser., No 119.Google Scholar
  34. Merbs C.F. 1989.Spondylolysis: its nature and anthropological significance. Int., J. Anthropol., 4: 163–169.Google Scholar
  35. Miller E. 1992.The effects of horseback riding on the human skeleton. Paper presented at the 1992 Meeting of the Palaeopathology Association, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
  36. Miller E. & Reinhardt K.J. The effect of horseback riding on the Omaha and Ponca: Paleopathological indications of European contact. 1991 Plains Anthropology Conference, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  37. M. Nepper I. 1990.Rangosak és közrendûek leletei négy újonnan feltárt X. századi temetôben.In:Etelközbôl a Kárpát-medencébe — A honfoglalók legújabb leletei (edited by L. Révész & I. M. Nepper). Debrecen: Déri Múzeum kiállítási katalógusa.Google Scholar
  38. M. Nepper I. 1991.Sárrétudvari és környéke a XIII. századig. Bihari Múzeum Évkönyve, 6–7: 36–59.Google Scholar
  39. Oláh S. 1990.Investigation of bilateral non-metric traits in a sample from the 10th century. Acta Biol. Szeged., 36: 75–79.Google Scholar
  40. Pálfi Gy. 1992.Traces d'activités sur les squelettes des anciens Hongrois. Bull. et Mém. de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 3–4: 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pálfi Gy. 1993.Maladies, activités et environnements des populations anciennes en Europe Centrale et Occidentale: approche de paléopathologie comparée. PhD thesis. Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
  42. Pálfi Gy., Dutour O. &Bérato J. 1993.Traumas and activities: A case report about a polytraumatism from the Late Antiquity in France. Journal of Palaeopathology, 5, 1: 17–24.Google Scholar
  43. Resnick D. &Niwayama G. 1988.Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders. Philadelphia, Saunders.Google Scholar
  44. Rodineau J. &Simon L. 1987.Microtraumatologie du sport et surmenage articulaire. Collection de pathologie locomotrice, 13. Paris, Masson.Google Scholar
  45. Rogers J., Waldron T., Dieppe P. &Watt I. 1987.Arthropathies in palaeopathology: The basis of classification according to most probable cause. J. Arch. Science, 14: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roy-Camille R., Mazel Ch. &Saillant G. 1992.Etiopathogénie de la lyse isthmique et du spondylolisthésis. In: La charnière lombo-sacrée (edited by R. Roy-Camille). Paris, Masson, pp. 154–159.Google Scholar
  47. Runge M. 1994.Arthroses du coude, du poignet et de la main. Encycl. Méd-Chir., Radiodiagnostic-Neuroradiologie-App. locomoteur, 31312 B10, Paris.Google Scholar
  48. Saraste H. 1993.Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl., 251: 84–86.Google Scholar
  49. Simon L., Blotman F., Claustre J. &Hérisson Ch. 1989.Rhumatologie. Paris, Masson.Google Scholar
  50. Simon L., Hérisson Ch. &Rodineau J. 1991Pathologie des insertions et enthésopathies. Paris, Masson.Google Scholar
  51. Stinson J.T. 1993.Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the athlete. Clin. Sports. Med., 12: 517–528.Google Scholar
  52. Stirland A. 1984.Possible correlation between os acromiale and occupation in the burial from the Mary Rose. Proceedings of the 5th European Meeting of Palaeopathology Assiciation (edited by V. Capecchi & E. Rabino Massa Siena: Siena University Press., pp. 327–334.Google Scholar
  53. Stirland A. 1991.Diagnosis of occupationally related palaeopathology: Can it be done? In: Human palaeopathology: Current syntheses and future options (edited by D.J. Ortner & A.C. Aufderheide). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 40–47.Google Scholar
  54. Stirland A. 1993.Asymmetry and activity-related change in the male humerus. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 3: 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vernan G.R. 1964.Man on Horseback. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  56. Verrouil E. &Mazieres B. 1995.Etiologic factors in osteoarthritis of the fingers. Rev. Rhum. (Engl. Ed.), 62 (6, suppl. 1): 9–13.Google Scholar
  57. Watson H.K. &Brenner L.H. 1988.Degenerative disorders of the carpus. In: The wrist and its disorders (edited by D. M. Lichtman). Philadelphia, Saunders, pp. 286–292.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gy. Pálfi
    • 1
    • 2
  • O. Dutour
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyJózsef Attila UniversitySzegedHungary
  2. 2.Centre Archéologique du VarToulonFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire d'Anthropologie Biologique, Faculté de MédecineUniversité d'Aix-Marseille IIMarseille Cedex 5France
  4. 4.Laboratoire d'Anthropologie et de PréhistoireUniversité de ProvenceAix-en-ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations