The salinity of hypersaline brines: Concepts and misconceptions

  • David A. Anati
Article

Abstract

Some widespread misconceptions about salinity are pointed out, explained and commented on. Definitions, units, and methods of salinity determination recommended for brines of moderate salinities may become unsuitable for highly saline brines. Various salinity units are examined and commented on, and density at a precisely monitored temperature is chosen as the preferable “substitute parameter” for salinity determination of hypersaline brines. It is shown that ambient air density during pycnometric measurements must be known as accurately as required of the brine's density, and that its value must be added to the direct pycnometric measurement. Variations of atmospheric pressure at the time of pycnometry must be taken into account if greater than 15 mB. For a salinity accuracy of ±0.02 per mille, as required for some physical and chemical studies, the temperature of the sample during salinity measurement must be monitored with an accuracy of at least 0.04°C. A definite curve in the ρ-S plane, corresponding to the conversion of salinity to density at a fixed temperature, andvice-versa, does not exist if the brine is saturated in one of its salts. Non-linearity in the equation of state is shown to affect the surface level drop due to evaporation; the effect is negligible at low salinities, but a 10 per cent correction is already required at the salinity found in the northern Red Sea (41 per mille). Reliable reference points for the conversion of absolute salinity to density of highly saline brines are not known, at present, as accurately as desirable; pending the accurate determination of such reference points, a substantial dilution of hypersaline brines (for the purpose of adapting them to conductivity measurements) would multiply the error range by more than a hundred fold. On the other hand, a minute dilution of hypersaline brine samples to prevent salt crystal formation is possible and would not bring about any major increase of the error range in their density (salinity) determination.

Key words

Dead Sea equation of state pycnometry salinity saturation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anati, D.A. 1993. How much salt precipitates from the brines of a hypersaline lake? The Dead Sea as a case study. Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 57: 2191–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anati, D.A. and Stiller, M. 1991. The post-1979 thermohaline structure of the Dead Sea and the role of double-diffusive mixing. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 342–354.Google Scholar
  3. Forschhammer, G. 1865. On the composition of sea-water in different parts of the ocean. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London 155: 203–262.Google Scholar
  4. Gavrieli, I., Starinsky, A. and Bein, A. 1989. The solubility of halite as a function of temperature in the highly saline Dead Sea brine system. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34: 1224–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaushansky, P. and Starobinet, S. 1982. A temperature gradient column for the rapid measurement of the density of brines. Marine Chemistry 11: 289–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Krumgalz, B.S. and Millero F.J. 1982a. Physico-chemical study of the Dead Sea Waters. I. Activity coefficients of major ions in the Dead Sea water. Marine Chemistry 11: 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krumgalz, B.S. and Millero F.J. 1982b. Physico-chemical study of the Dead Sea Waters. II. Density measurements and equation of state of Dead Sea water at 1 atm. Marine Chemistry 11: 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lazar, B. 1982. Geochemical studies of heavy metals in natural waters. Ph.D. thesis the Hebrew university, Jerusalem, 174, 166 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Levi, Y., Bodenheimmer, Y. and Varshawski, Y. 1984. Optical Measurements in the Dead Sea. Jerusalem College of Technology.Google Scholar
  10. Marcet, A. 1819. On the specific gravity, and temperature, in different parts of the ocean, and particular seas; with some account on their saline content. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 10: 161–208.Google Scholar
  11. Neumann, G. and Pierson, W.S. 1966. Principles of Physical Oceanography. Prentice-Hall Inc., 323 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Oren, A. and Anati, D.A. 1996. Termination of the Dead Sea 1991–1995 stratification: Biological and physical evidence. Isr. J. Earth Sci 45: 81–88.Google Scholar
  13. Steinhorn, I. 1981. A Hydrographical and Physical study of the Dead Sea during the destruction of its long-term meromictic stratification. PhD thesis, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, 323 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Stiller, M., Kaushansky, P. and Carmi, I. 1983. Recent climatic changes recorded by the salinity of pore waters in the Dead Sea sediments. Hydrobiologia 103: 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sverdrup, H.U. 1983. Vereinfachtes Verfahren zum Berechnung der Druck und Massenverteilung im Meer. Geophys. Pub. 10(1), Oslo.Google Scholar
  16. Unesco (1976) Technical papers in marine sciences, 24.Google Scholar
  17. Williams, W.D. and Sherwood, J.E. 1994. Definition and measurement of salinity in salt lakes. Int. J. Salt Lake Res. 3: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Anati
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Earth SciencesHebrew University in JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations