Sexual Plant Reproduction

, 9:362

Types and meaning of pollen carbohydrate reserves

  • E. Pacini
Minireview

Abstract

During pollen development, soluble carbohydrates of sporophytic origin may be consumed immediately, polymerized to form starch reserves or intine, or transformed into other molecules. Disregarding intine, in mature pollen there are three different types of carbohydrates: (1) polysaccharides such as starch in amyloplasts or polysaccharides in cytoplasmic vesicles, (2) disaccharides such as sucrose and (3) monosaccharides such as glucose and fructose. At dispersal, pollen may be partly or slightly dehydrated, or not dehydrated at all. Partly dehydrated pollen has the capacity to lose or acquire water within limits without detriment to its viability. Slightly and non-dehydrated pollen is vulnerable to water loss and quickly becomes inviable. In partly dehydrated of pollen the carbohydrates consist of cytoplasmic polysacharides and sucrose; in slightly and non-dehydrated pollen these are absent or in low concentrations but there may be reserves of cytoplasmic callose. Starch, glucose and fructose are found in both types. It is postulated that cytoplasmic carbohydrates and sucrose are involved in protecting pollen viability during exposure and dispersal.

Key words

Starch Cytoplasmic polysaccharides Sucrose Pollen water content Viability 

References

  1. Baker HG, Baker I (1983), Some evolutionary and taxonomic implications of variation in the chemical composition of pollen. In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano E (eds) Pollen biology and implications in plant breeding. Elsevier, New York, pp 43–52Google Scholar
  2. Bassani M, Pacini E, Franchi GG (1994) Humidity stress responses in pollen of anemophilous and entomophilous species. Grana 33:146–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown RC, Lemmon BE (1981) Aperture development in spores of the mossTrematodon longicollis Mx. Protoplasma 106:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buitink J, Walters-Vertucci C, Hoekstra FA, Leprince O (1996) Calorimetric properties of dehydrating pollen. Plant Physiol 111:235–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clement C, Chavant L, Burrus M, Audran JC (1994) Anther starch variations inLilium during pollen development. Sex Plant Reprod 7:347–356.Google Scholar
  6. Cran DR (1979) The ultrastructure of fern gametophyte cells. In: Dyer AF (ed) The experimental biology of ferns. Academic Press, London, pp 171–213Google Scholar
  7. Ducker SC, Pettitt JM, Knox RB (1978) Biology of Australian sea grasses: pollen development and submarine pollination inAmphibolis antarctica andThalassodendron ciliatum (Cymodoceaceae) Aust J Bot 26:265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumas C, Duplan J-C, Said C, Soulier J-P (1983)1H nuclear magnetic resonance to correlate water content and pollen viability. In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano E (eds) Pollen biology and implications in plant breeding. Elsevier, New York, pp 15–20Google Scholar
  9. Franchi GG, Pacini E, Rottoli P (1984) Pollen grain viability inParietaria judaica L. during the long blooming period and correlation with meteorological conditions and allergic diseases. G Bot Ital 118:163–178Google Scholar
  10. Franchi GG, Bellani L, Nepi M, Pacini E (1996) Types of carbohydrate reserves in pollen: localization, systematic distribution and ecophysiological significance. Flora 191:1–17Google Scholar
  11. Heslop-Harrison J (1979) An interpretation of the hydrodynamics of pollen. Am J Bot 66:737–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoekstra FA, Roekel T van 1988) Desiccation tolerance ofPapaver dubium L. pollen during its development in the anther. Plant Physiol 88:626–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoekstra FA, Crowe JH, Crowe LM (1989) Differential desiccation sensitivity of corn andPennisetum pollen linked to their sucrose contents. Plant Cell Environ 12: 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoekstra FA, Crowe JH, Crowe LM (1991) Effect of sucrose on phase behaviour of membranes in intact pollen ofTypha latifolia L., as measured with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Plant Physiol 97:1073–1079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoekstra FA, Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Roekel T van, Vermeer E (1992) Do phospholipids and sucrose determine membrane phase transitions in dehydrating pollen species? Plant Cell Environ 15:601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keijzer CJ (1987) The process of anther dehiscence and pollen dispersal. I. The opening mechanism of longitudinal dehiscing anthers. New Phytol 105:487–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lisci M, Tanda C, Pacini E (1994) Pollination ecophysiology ofMercurialis annua L.(Euphorbiaceae), and anemophilous species flowering all year round. Ann Bot 74:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lisci M, Cardinali G, Pacini E (in press) Pollen dispersal and role of pollenkitt inMercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae). FloraGoogle Scholar
  19. Neidhart HV (1979) Comparative studies of sporogenesis in bryophytes. In: Clarke GCS, Duckett JS (eds) Bryophyte systematics. Academic Press, London, pp 251–280Google Scholar
  20. Nepi M, Pacini E (1993) Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity inCucurbita pepo. Ann Bot 72:526–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nepi M, Ciampolini F, Pacini E (1995) Development ofCucurbita pepo pollen. Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the sporoderm. Can J Bot 73:1046–1057Google Scholar
  22. Nipi M, Ciampolini F, Pacini E (1996) Plastid differentiation duringCucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) pollen grain development. Sex Plant Reprod 9:17–24Google Scholar
  23. O'Brien TP, McCully ME (1981) The study of plant structure. Principles and selected methods. Thermarcarphi, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  24. Pacini E (1990a) Tapetum and microspore function. In: Blackmore S, Knox RB (eds) Microsporogenesis: ontogeny and systematic. Academic Press, London, pp 213–237Google Scholar
  25. Pacini E (1990b) Harmomegathic characters of Pteridophyta spores and Spermatophyta pollen. In: Hesse M, Ehrendorfer F (eds)_Morphology, development and systematic relevance of pollen and spores. Springer, Vienna, pp 53–69Google Scholar
  26. Pacini E (1994) Cell biology of anther and pollen development. In: Williams EG, Knox RB, Clarke AE (eds) Genetic control of self incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 289–308Google Scholar
  27. Pacini E, Franchi GG (1988) Amylogenesis and amylolysis during pollen grain development. In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–186Google Scholar
  28. Pacini E, Juniper BJ (1984) The ultrastructure of pollen grain development inLycopersicum peruvianon. Caryologia 37:21–50Google Scholar
  29. Pacini E, Viegi L (1995) Total polysaccharide content of developing pollen in two angiosperm species. Grana 34:237–241Google Scholar
  30. Pacini E, Taylor PE, Singh MB, Knox RB (1992a) Plastid developmental pathway in some angiosperm reproductive cells. In: Ottaviano E Mulcahy DL, Sari-Gorla (eds) Angiosperm pollen and ovules. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 36–42Google Scholar
  31. Pacini E, Taylor PE, Singh MB, Knox RB (1992b) Development of plastids, including amyloplasts and starch granules, in pollen and tapetum of rye-grass,Lolium perenne. Ann Bot 70:179–188Google Scholar
  32. Pandolfi T, Pacini E, Calder DM (1993) Ontogenesis of monad pollen inPterostylis plumosa (Orchidaceae Neottioideae). Plant Syst Evol 186:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanley RG, Linskens HF (1974) Pollen: biology, biochemistry and management. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Pacini
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany Section, Department of Environmental BiologyUniversity of SienaSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations