Advertisement

Human Evolution

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 255–263 | Cite as

The unusual cranial attributes of KNM-ER 1805 and their implication for studies of sexual dimorphism inHomo habilis

  • J. L. Thompson
Article

Abstract

A principal components analysis (PCA) of basicranial measurements (Thompson 1991) isolated KNM-ER 1805 as having the highest Principal Component (PC) score on PCI of all the fossil hominids. Two measurements with high loadings on PCI were B12 and B13 and these two measurements indicate the relative positions of the foramina ovale (FO) and infratemporal crests (IT) to the tympanic bone (TP). The object of this study was to compare the two measurements of KNM-ER 1805 with those of other early fossil hominids as well as a sample of extant hominoids. The comparison involved the raw measurements, the index of the two measurements, the coefficient of variation, and a t-test. The results of this comparison showed that KNM-ER 1805 had more forwardly placed foramina ovale than any of the comparative specimens. KNM-ER 1805 possesses a number of other unique features which differentiate it from other hominids including a persistent metopic suture, the form of the premolar roots, and the form of the asterionic region. These apparent unique features mean that KNM-ER 1805 is unlikely to represent an “average” maleHomo habilis and so is an inappropriate model for the male morph of that species.

Key words

Hominids Foramina ovale basicranium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chamberlain A.T. & Wood B.A., 1985.A reappraisal of variation in hominid mandibular corpus dimensions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 66, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dean M.C. & Wood B.A., 1981.Metrical analysis of the basicranium of extant hominoids and Australopithecus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 54, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dean M.C. & Wood B.A., 1982.Basicranial anatomy of Plio-Pleistocene hominids from East and South Africa. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 59, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnston T. B. & Whillis J., 1956. Gray's Anatomy. Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  5. Laitrnan J.T., 1985. Later Middle Pleistocene hominids. In (E. Delson, ed.). Ancestors: the hard evidence, pp. 265–267, Alan R. Liss, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Leakey R.E.F., 1974.Further evidence of Lower Pleistocene hominids from East Rudolf, North Kenya, 1973, Nature 248, 653–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Thomas D.H., 1976. Figuring Anthropology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Thompson J.L. 1991. The significance of early hominid cranial variability. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Durham University.Google Scholar
  9. Tortora G.J. & Anagnostakos N.P., 1987. Principles of anatomy and physiology. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  10. White T.D., Johanson D.C. & Kimbel W.H., 1981.Australopithecus africanus: its pyletic position reconsidered. South African Journal of Science 77, 445–470.Google Scholar
  11. Wood B.A., 1981. Koobi Fora Research Project Volume 4: Hominid Cranial Remains. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Wood B.A. & van Noten F.L., 1986.Preliminary observations on the BK 8518 mandible from Baringo, Kenya. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 52, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zar J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Second Edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Social Sciences Scarborough CollegeUniversity of TorontoScarboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations