Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 427–437 | Cite as

Book reviews

  • J. Paul Fedoroff
  • John A. Hunter
  • Grant T. Harris
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hucker, S. J. (1985). Self-harmful sexual behavior.Psychiat. Clin. N. Am. 8: 323–338.Google Scholar
  2. Hucker, S. J. (1990). Sexual asphyxia. In Bowden, P. and Bluglass, R. (eds.),Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, Churchill-Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
  3. R. v. Mohan (1994). 89 Canadian Criminal Cases (3d) 402.Google Scholar
  4. Rosner, R. (ed.). (1994).Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, Chapman & Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. Elliot, D. (1994, November). The developmental courses of sexual and non-sexual violence: Results from a national longitudinal study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

References

  1. Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia.J. Exp. Psychol: Human Learning and Memory 5: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ellis, L. (1991). A synthesized (biosocial) theory of rape.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 631–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hall, G. N., Shondrick, D., and Hirschman, R. (1993). The role of sexual arousal in sexually aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 61: 1091–1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., and Earls, C. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment.Psychol. Assess. 4: 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lalumière, M. L., and Quinsey, V. L. (1993). The sensitivity of phallometric measures with rapists.Ann. Sex Res. 6: 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lalumière, M. L., and Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The discriminability of rapists from non-sex offenders using phallometric measures: A meta-analysis.Crin. Justice Behav. 21: 150–175.Google Scholar
  7. Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., and Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 670–681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marques, J. K., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., and West, M. A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offender recidivism: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study.Crim. Justice Behav. 21: 28–54.Google Scholar
  9. Palmer, C. T. (1988). Twelve reasons why rape is not sexually motivated: A skeptical examination.J. Sex Res. 25: 512–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., and Lalumière, M. L. (1993). Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders.J. Interpers. Violence 8: 512–523.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Paul Fedoroff
    • 1
  • John A. Hunter
    • 2
  • Grant T. Harris
    • 3
  1. 1.Forensic DivisionClarke Institute of PsychiatryTorontoCanada
  2. 2.The Pines Treatment CenterPortsmouth
  3. 3.Research DepartmentMental Health CentrePenetanguisheneCanada

Personalised recommendations