Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 409–425 | Cite as

Transsexualism in Germany: Empirical data on epidemiology and application of the German Transsexuals' Act during its first ten years

  • Cordula Weitze
  • Susanne Osburg


In light of possible emulation of the German Transsexuals' Act (TSG) in discussions taking place on future legislation in other states, on the 10th anniversary of the German TSG, we review the application of this law, as well as epidemiological data arising from its use. From 1981 to 1990, 1422 judicial decisions were rendered in Germany on this basis: 683 of them related to the so-called “small solution” (change of first name), and 733 involved what is termed the “major solution” (legal change of sex status). The frequency of transsexual applications over these 10 years lay between 2.1 and 2.4 per 100,000 German adult population. The average age was 33. Only 3.6% and 10.9% of the small and major applications, respectively, were rejected by courts. The sex ratio was 2.3:1 in favor of male-to-female transsexuals. Data revealed no significant trend over the years among the prevailing practices of adjudication, but evidence does exist that the German courts apply the law differently on a regional basis. Over the 10-year period, only six persons requested to have their names changed back again and only one to be reassigned to the former legal sex classification. Those who change their first names in the sense of a tentative accustomizing process waited an average of 2 years before changing their gender. Between 20 and 30% apparently went no further than the so-called “small solution”.

Key Words

transsexual gender identity disorder sex reassignment legal sex 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association (1987).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, APA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Augstein, M. S. (1983). Zwei Jahre Transsexuellengesetz.StAz 36: 339–341.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, H. (1966).The Transsexual Phenomenon, Julian Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Brzek, A., and Sipova, L. (1983). Transsexuelle in Prag.Sexualmedizin 3: 110–112.Google Scholar
  5. Gooren, L., van Kesteren, P., and Megens, J. (1993). Epidemiological data on 1194 transsexuals. Poster presented on the conference “Psychomedical Aspects of Gender Problems,” Amsterdam, April 18–20.Google Scholar
  6. Godlewski, J. (1988). Transsexualism and anatomic sex reversal in Poland.Arch. Sex. Behav. 17: 547–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoenig, J., and Kenna, J. (1974). The prevalence of transsexualism in England and Wales.Br. J. Psychiat. 124: 181–190.Google Scholar
  8. Kockott, G., and Fahrner, E. M. (1988). Male-to-female and female-to-male transsexuals: a comparison.Arch. Sex. Behav. 17: 539–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kröhn, W., Bertermann, H., Wand, H., and Wille, R. (1981). Nachuntersuchungen bei operierten Transsexuellen.Nervenartz 52: 26–31.Google Scholar
  10. Pauly, I. (1968). The current status of the change of sex operation.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 147: 460–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pauly, I. (1974). Female transsexualism: Part I and II.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 487–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pfäfflin, F. (1981). Psychiatric and legal implications of the new law for transsexuals in the Federal Republic of Germany.Int. J. Law Psychiat. 4: 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pfäfflin, F. (1986). Fünf Jahre Transsexuellengesetz—Eine Zwischenbilanz.StAz. 39: 199–203.Google Scholar
  14. Pfäfflin, F (1993).Transsexualität. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  15. Pfäfflin, F., and Junge, A. (1992). Nachuntersuchungen nach Geschlechtsumwandlung. Eine kommentierte Literaturübersicht 1961–1991. In Pfäfflin, F., and Junge, A. (eds.),Geschlechtsumwandlung, Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart and New York, pp. 149 ff.Google Scholar
  16. Ross, M. W., Walinder, J., Lundström, B., and Thuwe, I. (1981). Cross-cultural approaches to transsexualism.Acta Psychiat. Scand. 63: 75–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sigusch, V. (1991). Die Transsexuellen und unser nosomorpher Blick. Part I/II.Z. Sexualforsch. 4: 225–256; 309–343.Google Scholar
  18. Tsoi, W. F. (1988). The prevalence of transsexualism in Singapore.Acta Psychiat. Scand. 78: 501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Walinder, J. (1968). Transsexualism: Definition, prevalence and sex distribution.Acta Psychiat. Scad. 44(Suppl.): 255–257.Google Scholar
  20. Walinder, J. (1971). Incidence and sex ratio of transsexualism in Sweden.Br. J. Psychiat 118: 195–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Will, M. R. (1992). “... ein Leiden mit dem Recht.” Zur Namens-und Geschlechtsänderung bei transsexuellen Menschen in Europa. In Pfäfflin, F., and Junge, A. (eds.),Geschlechtsumwandlung Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgard and New York, pp. 113–147.Google Scholar
  22. Will, M. R. (1993). Legal conditions of sex reassignment by medical intervention—Situation in comparative law,Colloquy on Transsexualism, Medicine and Law, Council of Europe, Amsterdam, April 14–16, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cordula Weitze
    • 1
  • Susanne Osburg
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für forensische PsychiatrieFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations