Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 379–395 | Cite as

Sexual content induced delays in unprimed lexical decisions: Gender and context effects

  • James H. Geer
  • Heidi S. Bellard
Article

Abstract

Two experiments are reported in which subjects made unprimed lexical decisions where the targets included sexual, romantic, and neutral words. Predicted gender differences in lexical decision times are found. Women delayed their lexical decisions when the target was sexual and the delay was present, but reduced, when the target word was romantic. For men these delays while in the same direction, were smaller and failed to attain statistical significance. Data were collected on the several characteristics of the target words. We found that word familiarity influenced decision time but could not account for the word content induced delay. Similarly, neither word emotionality nor word acceptability accounted for the delay. Finding a strong effect of sexual word content for women in unprimed lexical decisions makes it clear that the effect is present at very basic levels of information processing. This suggests that it is a pervasive characteristic of the responding to sexual stimuli that occurs throughout much of cognitive activity.

Key Words

lexical decisions information processing gender differences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Besner, D., and Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Basic processes in word recognition and identification: An overview. In Besner, D., and Humphreys, G. W. (eds.),Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–91.Google Scholar
  2. Dixon, N. (1980).Preconscious Processing, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Erdelyi, M. (1974). A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance.Psychol. Rev. 81: 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frijda, N. (1993). The place of appraisal in emotion.Cognit. Emot. 7: 357–387.Google Scholar
  5. Galbraith, G., and Sturke, R. (1974). Effects of stimulus sexuality, order of presentation and sex guilt on free associative latencies.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 828–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geer, J. (1991, August). Erotic, romantic, and neutral words used as primes and targets in a lexical decision task. Poster presented, International Academy of Sex Research Meetings. Barre, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Geer, J., and Lapour, K. (1990, August). The sexes differ in their processing of erotic, romantic, and neutral sentences. Poster presented, American Psychological Society Meetings. Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  8. Geer, J., Lapour, K., and Jackson, S. (1993). The information processing approach to human sexuality. In Birbaumer, N., and Ohman, A. (eds.),The Structure of Emotion: Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Clinical Aspects, Hogrefe-Huber, Toronto, pp. 139–155.Google Scholar
  9. Geer, J., and McGlone, M. S. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica.Cognit. Emot. 4: 71–78.Google Scholar
  10. Geer, J., and Melton, J. (in press). Sexually ambiguous lexical decisions.Arch. Sex. Behav. Google Scholar
  11. Gernsbacher, M. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography concreteness and polysomy.J. Exp. Psychol. 113: 256–281.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, A. B., and Kemp-Wheeler, S. M. (1989b). The influence of anxiety on lexical and affective decision time for emotional words.Pers. Indiv. Diff. 10: 1143–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill, A. B., and Kemp-Wheeler, S. M. (1989b). The influence of context on lexical decision times for emotionally aversive words.Curr. Psychol. Res. Rev. 8: 219–227.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, S. R., and Geer, J. H. (1995). Responses to threat-related information: A nonclinical sample. (Manuscript submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  15. Jones, J., and Barlow, D. (1990). Self reported frequency of sexual urges, fantasies, and masturbatory fantasies in heterosexual males and females.Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 269–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kemp-Wheeler, S. M., and Hill, A. B. (1992). Semantic and emotional priming below objective detection threshold.Cognit. Emot. 6: 113–128.Google Scholar
  17. Kirsch-Rosenkrantz, J., and Geer, J. (1991). Gender differences in memory for a sexual story.Arch. Sex. Behav. 20: 295–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitayama, S. (1991). Impairment of perception by positive and negative affect.Cognit. Emot. 5: 255–274.Google Scholar
  19. Lang, P., Bradley, M., and Cuthbert, B. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex.Psychol. Rev. 97: 377–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laumann, E. G., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., and Michaels, S. (1991).The Social Organization of Sexuality, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Massaro, D. W., and Cowan, N. (1993). Information processing models: Microscopes of the mind.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 44: 383–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatables.Behav. Res. Methods Instr. Comput. 20: 206–217.Google Scholar
  23. Solso, R. (1988).Cognitive Psychology, 2nd ed., Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • James H. Geer
    • 1
  • Heidi S. Bellard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton Rouge

Personalised recommendations