Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 439–453 | Cite as

The relationship between nonenforcement of state pronography laws and rates of sex crime arrests

  • Charles Winick
  • John T. Evans


The nonoperation of antipornography statutes in four states (Maine, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington) for varying periods between 1973 and 1986 provided an opportunity to examine the impact of such statutes and pornography availability on sex crimes because nonenforcement is associated with an increase in the availability of sexually explicit materials. Arrests for property offenses and for rape, prostitution, and other sex offenses during the period before the suspension of the laws, when compared with the period during suspension, reflected no significant changes. Findings are consistent with other foreign and American studies that have failed to find a link between exposure to sexually explicit media materials and rates of reports of rape and other sex offenses.

Key Words

rape pornography nexus effects sexually explicit media 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., and Guild, D. (1977). The components of rapists' sexual arousal.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 34: 895–903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Attorney General. (1985).Commission on Pornography Final Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, L., and Straus, M. A. (1986, June).Rape and its relation to social disorganization, pornography, and sexual inequality in the United States. Paper presented at the International Congress on Rape, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, L., and Straus, M. A. (1989).Four Theories of Rape in American Society, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, L. (1974). Some determinants of impulsive aggression: The role of mediated associations with reinforcements for aggression.Psychol. Rev. 81: 410–427.Google Scholar
  6. Brannigan, A., and Kapardis, A. (1986). The controversy over pornography and sex crimes: The criminology evidence and beyond.Aust. New Z. J. Criminol. 19: 259–284.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, R. F. S., and Fosen, R. H. (1971). Pornography and the sex offender.Technical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Vol. 7, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
  8. Dworkin, S. (1981).Pornography: Men Possessing Women, G. P. Putnam, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, W. A. and Grenier, G. (1994). Violent pornography, antiwoman thoughts, and antiwoman acts: In search of reliable effects.J. Sex. Res. 31: 23–26.Google Scholar
  10. Gebhard, P., Gagnon, J. H., Pomeroy, W. B., and Christenson, V. (1967).Sex Offenders: An Analysis of Types, Bantam, New York, p. 678.Google Scholar
  11. Groth, A. N., and Birnbaum, H. J. (1979).Men Who Rape: The Psychology of the Offender, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, G. C. M. Hirschman, R., Graham, J. R., and Zargoza, M. S. (eds.). (1993).Sexual Aggression: Issues in Etiology Assessment and Treatment, Taylor and Frances, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Hindelang, M. J. (1974). The uniform crime reports revisited.J. Crim. Justice, 2: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kutchinsky, B. (1983). Obscenity and pornography: Behavioral aspects. In Kadish, S. H. (ed.),Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, Vol. 3, Free Press, New York, pp. 1077–1086.Google Scholar
  15. Kutchinsky, B. (1991a). Pornography and rape: Theory and practice?Int. J. Law Psychiat. 14: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kutchinsky, B. (1991b). Pornography, sex crime, and public policy. In Gerull, S. A., and Halsted, B. (eds.),Sex Industry and Public Policy, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, pp. 41–55.Google Scholar
  17. Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., and Penrod, S. (1984). The effects of multiple exposures to filmed violence against women.J. Commun. 34: 130–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Sexuality, pornography, and method: Pleasure under patriarchy.Ethics 99: 314–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKinnon, C. A. (1993).Only Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Malamuth, N. M. and Donnerstein, E. (1984).Pornography and Sexual Aggression, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, R. (1980). Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In Lederer, L. (ed.),Take Back the Night: Women on Pornography, William Morrow, New York, pp. 134–140.Google Scholar
  22. Obscenity Research Project. (1977). An empirical inquiry into the effects ofMiller v. California on the control of obscenity.N.Y.U. Law Rev. 52: 810–939.Google Scholar
  23. Palys, T. (1984). A content analysis of sexually explicit videos in British Columbia. Report 15, Working Papers on Pornography and Prostitution, Simon Fraser University School of Criminology, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
  24. Propper, M. M. (1972). Exposure to sexually oriented materials among young male prisoners.Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Vol. 8, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 313–404.Google Scholar
  25. Quincey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., and Varney, G. (1981). A comparison of rapists' and nonsex offenders' sexual preference for mutually consenting sex, rape, and physical abuse of women.Behav. Assess. 3: 127–135.Google Scholar
  26. Scott, J. E., and Schwalm, L. A. (1988a). Rape rates and the circulation rates of adult magazines.J. Sex. Res. 24: 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scott, J. E., and Schwalm, L. A. (1988b). Pornography and rape: An examination of adult theater rates and rape rates by state. In Scott, J. E., and Hirschi, T. (eds.),Controversial Issues in Crime and Justice, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 40–53.Google Scholar
  28. Soble, A. (1986).Pornography, Marxism, and the Future of Sexuality, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  29. Straus, M. S., and Baron, L. (1983, November 11). Sexual stratification, pornography, and rape in American states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Denver.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Justice. (1985).Uniform Crime Reports 1984, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Winick, C. (1977). From deviant to normative: Changes in the social acceptability of sexually explicit material. In Sagarin, E. (ed.),Deviance and Social Change, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 219–246.Google Scholar
  32. Winick, C. (1985). A content analysis of sexually explicit magazines sold in adult bookstores.J. Sex Res. 21: 206–210.Google Scholar
  33. Yablonsky, L. (1990).Criminology: Crime and Criminality, Harper and Row, New York, p. 102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Winick
    • 1
  • John T. Evans
    • 2
  1. 1.Program in SociologyCity University of New York Graduate SchoolNew York
  2. 2.Long Island UniversityBrooklyn

Personalised recommendations