Human Evolution

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 107–117

Homo erectus brain sizes by subspecies

  • G. S. Krantz
Article

Abstract

Homo erectus fossils can be divided into four zoogeographic zones that show different rates of endocranial expansion during the Pleistocene. When these are also grouped into three time levels, we find small increases from early to middle forms, and regularly greater increases from middle to late forms. These increases fit a regular pattern that also accomodates all archaic types, including Neandertals, as late subspecies ofH. erectus.

Key Words

Archaic Cranial capacity Neandertal Homo erectus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beals, K.L., Smith, C.L., Dodd, S.M., 1984.Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines. Current Anthropology, 25: 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Begun, D., Walker, A., 1993.The endocast. In (A. Walker and R. Leakey, eds.), The NariokotomeHomo erectus Skeleton, pp. 326–358. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boule, M., 1909.Sur la capacité cranienne des hommes fossiles du type de neanderthal. Comtes Rendus Academie Science, D. (Paris) 148: 1352. As cited by Holloway, 1981b.Google Scholar
  4. Boule, M., 1911–13.L'Homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints. Annales de Paléontologie, 6–8.Google Scholar
  5. Boule, M., Vallois, H., 1952.Les Hommes Fossiles, 4th édition. Paris: Mason et Cie.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, R.J., 1976.New cranium of Homo erectusfrom Lake Ndutu, Tanzania. Nature, 262: 485–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coon, C.L., 1962.The Origin of Races. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  8. Day, M.H., Leakey, M.D., Magori, C., 1980.A new hominid fossil skull (L.H. 18) from the Ngaloba Beds, Laetoli, northern Tanzania. Nature, 284: 55–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliot Smith, G., 1928.Endocranial cast obtained from the Rhodesian Skull. In: Rhodesian Man and Associated Remains, by W.P. Pycraft. British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
  10. Groves, C.P., 1989.A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heim, J.L., 1970.L encéphale Néandertalien de l'Homme de La Ferrassie. Anthropologie, 74: 527–572.Google Scholar
  12. Henneberg, M., 1987.Hominid cranial capacity change through time: a Darwinian process. Human Evolution, 10: 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henneberg, M., 1989.Morphological and geological dating of early hominid fossils compared. Current Anthropology, 30: 527–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holloway, R.L., 1975.Early hominid endocasts: Volumes, morphology, and significance for hominid evolution. In (R.H. Tuttle ed.), Primate Functional Morphology and Evolution, pp. 393–415. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  15. Holloway, R.L., 1980.Indonesian “Solo” (Ngandong) endocranial reconstructions: Some preliminary observations and comparisons with neandertal and Homo erectusgroups. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53: 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holloway, R.L., 1981a.The Indonesian Homo erectusbrain casts revisited. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 55: 503–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holloway, R.L., 1981b.Volumetric and asymmetry determinations on recent hominid endocasts: Spy I and II, Debel Irhoud, I and the Salé Homo erectus specimens, with some notes on Neandertal brain sizes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 55: 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holloway, R.L., 1982. Homo erectusbrain endocats: volumetric and morphological observations with some comments on cerebral asymmetrics. Congress Internationale Palaeontologie Humaine, I, pp. 355–369. Nice: Prétirage.Google Scholar
  19. Jacob, T., 1973.Morphology and paleoecology of early man in Java. In (H. Tuttle ed.), Peoanthropology, Morphology and Paleoecology, pp. 311–325. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinschmidt, O., 1931.Der Urmensch. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Klein, R.G., 1989.The Human Career. UNiversity of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Krantz, G.S., 1980.Sapienization and speech. Current Anthropology, 21: 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krantz, G.S., 1993.The subspecies of Homo erectus. Human Evolution, 8: 275–279.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, S.H., 1994.Pattern of evolution in Homo erectuscranial, capacity. paper presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropology meeting in Denver, CO/U.S.A.Google Scholar
  25. McCown, T.D., Keith, A., 1939.The Stone Age of Mt. Carmel, II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Murrill, R., 1981.Petralona Man. Springfield, IL. Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  27. Piveteau, J., 1970.Les grottes de la chaise (Charente). Annales de Paléontologie (Vertèbres), 56: 175–225.Google Scholar
  28. Rightmire, G.P., 1983.The Lake Ndutu cranium of early Homo sapiensin Africa. American Journal of Human Evolution, 61: 245–254.Google Scholar
  29. Rightmire, G.P., 1985.The tempo of change in the evolution of Mid-Pleistocene Homo. In (E. Delson ed.), Ancestors: The Hard Evidence. pp. 255–264. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  30. Sartono, S., 1973. Implications arising from Pithecanthropus VIII. In (R.H. Tuttle, ed.), Paleoanthropology, Morphology and Paleoecology, PP. 327–360. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  31. Stewart, T.D., 1977.The Neanderthal skeletal remains from Shanidar cave, Iraq: a summary of findings to date. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 121: 121–165.Google Scholar
  32. Suzuki, H., Takai, F., (eds.), 1970.The Amud Man and His Cave Site. Tokyo: Keigaku.Google Scholar
  33. Tobias, P.V., 1971.The Brain in Hominid Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tobias, P.V., 1975.Brain evolution in the hominoidea. In (R. Tuttle, ed.), Primate Functional Morphology and Evolution, pp. 353–392. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  35. Vlcek, E., 1950.Le moulage en travertin du crane néandertalien de Ganovce, en Slovaquie. Zpravy Anthropologické Spolecnosti, 3:3. (Cited in Boule and Vallois, 1952).Google Scholar
  36. Weidenreich, F., 1928.Der Schadelfund von Weimar-Ehringsdorf. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
  37. Weidenreich, F., 1943.The skull of Sinanthropus pekinensis. Palaeontologia Sinica, new series D, 10: 1–291.Google Scholar
  38. Weinert, H., 1939. Africanthropus njarensis,beschreibung und phyletische Einordnung des ersten Affenmenschen aus Ostafrika. Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie, 38: 252–308.Google Scholar
  39. Wolpoff, M.H., 1971.Vertesszollos and the presapiens theory. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 35: 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolpoff, M.H., 1984.Evolution in Homo erectus:the question of stasis. Paleobiology, 10: 389–406.Google Scholar
  41. Wolpoff, M.H., 1985Human evolution at the peripheries; the pattern at the eastern edge. In (P.V. Tobias, ed.), Hominid Evolution: Past, Present and Future, pp. 355–365. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  42. Woo, J.K. (=Wu Rukang), 1965.A preliminary report on a skull of Sinanthropus lantianensis,of Lantian Shensi. Scientica Sinica, 13: 801–811.Google Scholar
  43. Wu Rukang, 1983.Hominid fossils from China and their bearing on human evolution. Canadian Journal of Anthropology, 3: 207–214.Google Scholar
  44. Wu Rukang, 1988.The reconstruction of the fossil human skull from Jinniushan Yingkou, Liaoning Province and its main features. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 42: 97–101.Google Scholar
  45. Wu Zinzhi, 1981.A well-preserved cranium of an archaic type of early, Homo sapiensfrom Dali, China. Sicentica Sinica, 24: 530–541.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. S. Krantz
    • 1
  1. 1.Anthropology DepartmentWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations