Human Evolution

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Sexual dimorphism in primates: Where are we and where do we go from here?

  • M. Pickford
  • A. B. Chiarelli
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

There are currently several debates taking place in palaeoanthropological circles in which the issue of sexual dimorphism is crucial. During the 60th Jubilee of the discovery of the TaungAustralopithecus skull, the authors concurred that much of the debate was due to differences in perception concerning dimorphism, and it was suggested that a study session dealing principally with sexual dimorphism in Primates should be organised with a view to determining what, if anything, could be observed in extant primates that might be utilised for determining the existence of dimorphism in fossil species. An advertisement was placed in the Journal of Human Evolution, calling for papers. Response was encouraging, suggesting that there was indeed a need for such a meeting, which was organised to take place late in November in Italy. Seventeen scientists sent abstracts, but due to the rather short notice, several were unable to attend the meeting. Nevertheless, papers were received and read at the meeting which form the basis for this issue of the Journal of Human Evolution. What remains to be done now, is for a second meeting to be organised at which the findings of the first meeting can be extended backwards in time into the fossil record.

Key words

sexual dimorphism Primates 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, 1980. —Recommendations for age and sex diagnosis of skeleton. Journal of Human Evolution, 9: 517–549.Google Scholar
  2. De Bonis L. andMelentis J., 1984. —La position phylétique d’Ouranopithecus. In: P. Andrews and J. Franzen (eds.)The early evolution of man. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg, Frankfurt, 69: 13–23.Google Scholar
  3. Delson E., 1985. —The earlist Sivapithecus? Nature, 318: 107–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frisch J., 1973. —Sexual dimorphism in canines of Hylobates lar. Primates, 4: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaulin S. andSailer L., 1984. —Sexual dimorphism in weight among the Primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. International Journal Primatology, 5: 515–535.Google Scholar
  6. Gingerich P., 1981. —Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. I. Sexual dimorphism in Adapis magnus and Adapis parisiensis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 56: 117–124.Google Scholar
  7. Greenfield L., 1972. —Sexual dimorphism in Dryopithecus africanus. Primates, 13: 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey P. andClutton-Brock T., 1985. —Life history variation in Primates. Evolution, 39: 559–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leutenegger W. andCheverud J., 1985. —Sexual dimorphism in Primates: The effects of size. In Jungers W., (ed.). Size and scaling in Primate Biology. Plenum Press, New York 1985: 35–50.Google Scholar
  10. Napier J. andNapier P., 1985. —The Natural History of the Primates. London, Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1–200.Google Scholar
  11. Oxnard C., 1983. —Sexual dimorphisms in the overall proportions of Primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 4: 1–22.Google Scholar
  12. Pickford M., 1985. —A new look at Kenyapithecus based on recent discoveries in Western Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 14: 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pickford M., (in prep.) —Sexual Dimorphism in Proconsul.Google Scholar
  14. Senut B., 1980. —New data on the humerus and its joints in Plio-Pleistocene hominids. Collegium Anthropologicum, 4: 87–93.Google Scholar
  15. Simons E. L., 1981. —Man’s immediate forerunners. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 292: 21–41.Google Scholar
  16. White T. D., Johanson D. andKimbel W., 1981. —Australopithecus afarensis. Its phyletic position reconsidered. South African Journal of Science, 77: 445–470.Google Scholar
  17. Wu R. andOxnard C., 1983. —Ramapithecines from China: evidence from dimensions of teeth. Nature, 306: 258–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zihlman A., 1984. —Body build and tissue composition in Pan panicus and Pan troglodytes, with comparisons to other hominoids. In: Sussman R., (ed.).The Pygmy Chimpanzee, pp. 179–200. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice II Sedicesimo 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Pickford
    • 1
  • A. B. Chiarelli
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of PalaeontologyJohannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzWest Germany
  2. 2.Istituto di AntropologiaFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations